HP OMEN 16z-xd000 review
HP OMEN 16z-xd000 — from 2023, 2.3 kg, performance 88.
Technical specifications
| Type | Gaming |
| Release year | 2023 |
| Screen | 16" · 1920x1080 |
| Processor | Intel Core i5 13420H , Intel Core i5 13500H , Intel Core i7 13620H , Intel Core i7 13700HX , Intel Core i9 13900HX , AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS , AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS , AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS |
| Graphics | GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile 6GB , GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile 6GB , GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile 8GB , GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile 8GB , GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile 12GB , GeForce RTX 4050 6GB |
| Max. RAM | 64 GB |
| Weight | 2.3 kg |
Performance scores
Three top-quartile readings and no measured weakness: the quiet overachiever
The OMEN 16z-xd000 (2023) brings an eight-core i5-13420H, an RTX 3050 6GB and 64GB of RAM at $894 — 19% above the gaming-class median, but priced below every machine it measures against. Three readings land in the top quartile simultaneously: reliability at 75 against a median of 53, mobility at 41 against 29, and CPU at 87.98 against 65.01 in enthusiast territory. The peer verdict returns no weakness at all. In a class full of trade-offs, this listing reads like the machine that skipped the line where they are handed out.
What the trio of strengths means in hand
Reliability at 75 is the rarest asset: top-quartile longevity odds on a 2023 platform. Mobility at 41 — 41% above the class median — says the sixteen-inch chassis carries better than the class norm. And the enthusiast CPU at 87.98 drives the full receipt sheet: Overwatch, GTA V and Rainbow Six Siege at recommended, Premiere Pro and Photoshop at minimum, Visual Studio Code at recommended. The RTX 3050 6GB is the mainstream ceiling of the platform — the one axis that reads ordinary — and the capability sheet keeps it honest as a 1080p-high card rather than a 1440p one.
The peer verdict and the standing tax
"No serious weak spots" is a class-relative statement: nothing in the measured set falls behind the peer median. The absolute context still applies — portability sits in the low band (28), the standing tax of the breed's chassis size — and the 3050 tier is the mainstream middle, not the top shelf. What elevates the listing is that every soft axis lands mid-pack while three hard axes land top-quartile.
Depreciation: 2023 pace, mid-tier exposure
From the $1,800 anchor the price has decayed to $894 at 16.3% per year, projecting to about $627 in two years — a further 30%. Standard recent-silicon pace; the offset is that the platform's strengths (reliability, CPU) depreciate slower in practice than the GPU tier does.
Against the neighbors
An XPS 15 9530 at $1,027 sits well above; a Legion 5 15ACH6H at $784 and an Alienware x14 at $798 sit below. The below-median alternatives offer a 3060-class GPU for less money but without the reliability or mobility readings. This seat's pitch: the most balanced evidence sheet in its immediate bracket, at a price only modestly above the median.
Bottom line
Fairly priced, and unusually defensible: enthusiast CPU, top-quartile reliability and carry, a complete capability sheet, and no measured weakness against the class. For a buyer who values longevity odds and everyday balance over maximum frames per dollar, this is one of the strongest seats in this price band.
🧭 Your context
Stage: Vague sense of need
Browse category overviews to narrow things down.
🎮 What it can run
⚙️ Configuration analysis
Top configuration easily handles AAA games at ultra settings, 4K video editing, and engineering applications.
🤔 How to choose
Universal advice for any use case.
- Reliability vs price: reliability (median 53) ↔ price (median 749.6).
- Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 29) ↔ overall performance (median 73.9).
- Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 100) ↔ battery life (median 2.5).
OMEN 16z-xd000: verdict
➡️ Next step
Browse category overviews to narrow things down.