Model review

ASUS ZenBook 14 UX435 review

ASUS ZenBook 14 UX435 — from 2021, 1.19 kg, performance 50.

ASUS ZenBook 14 UX435

Technical specifications

Type Ultrabook
Release year 2021
Screen 14" · 1920x1080
Processor Intel Core i5 1135G7 , Intel Core i7 1165G7
Graphics GeForce MX450 2GB
Max. RAM 16 GB
Weight 1.19 kg
Battery 63 Wh

Performance scores

Performance
50
/100
CPU
70
/100
GPU
45
/100
USComp
57
/100

The Intel MX450 twin, with the Far Cry receipt

The ZenBook 14 (UX435) of 2021 asks the same $739 as its AMD sibling UM425 in this same batch, with the same MX450 card and the same 16 GB of RAM — the Intel half of the twin experiment: a Core i5-1135G7 in place of the 5500U. Its placements: graphics at 44.73 against an ultrabook-class median of 3.84, 1064.8 percent above, mainstream tier, top quartile, and a performance index at 50.01, 19.9 percent above median in the mid band. The flagged weakness is the same 16 GB ceiling at half the class norm.

The receipt that separates the twins

The sheet is green where the sibling's is green — Overwatch and GTA V at recommended, the latter with a measured 140 fps entry, Photoshop and Visual Studio Code at minimum — and it adds one entry the sibling lacks: Far Cry 5 clearing recommended at a measured 34 fps. On identical tickets, identical cards, and near-identical placements, the measured Far Cry entry is the printed difference: this Intel seat carries the fuller gaming receipt set of the pair.

The same honest ledger

The 16 GB flag, the five years of age, the mid-band platform behind a mainstream card: the twin's costs are this machine's costs, itemized identically. The 1135G7 platform reads a step behind the sibling's aggregate-67 — the performance index here is mid-band, not top-quartile — which makes the trade legible: stronger measured gaming receipts against the softer blended platform score. The buyer picks which printed number matters.

Flat decay

The measured rate is 9.44 percent per year with no unit anchor. Two years retain roughly five-sixths of the $739 — the same gentle band as the twin, for the same reasons.

Positioning on the shelf

No analog peers are returned. The $739 premium row's three-way choice resolves to this: the ZenBook 13 for the carry-and-iGPU story, the UM425 for the aggregate score, this UX435 for the measured gaming receipts. One ticket, three verified answers, no wrong choices among them.

Bottom line

For a buyer who wants the fullest measured gaming set on the MX450 tier — GTA V and Far Cry 5 both at recommended with frame entries — this twin is the seat, and its article prints exactly what the extra receipt costs elsewhere: a mid-band platform score. The 16 GB ceiling is the shared standing flag. Honest twins, honestly differentiated.

🧭 Your context

Stage: Refining requirements

You're refining — compare finalists head-to-head.

🎯 For your profile

You've viewed: You've recently viewed 12 models — compare this model with them in the analogs matrix.

⭐ What stands out

graphics performance
44.7
memory capacity
16
overall performance
50
above median below median class median
  • graphics performance is higher than typical ultrabook class (+200%) (mainstream tier).
    top 25% of its category
  • memory capacity is lower than typical ultrabook class (+50%) (comfort).
    budget segment of category
  • overall performance is higher than typical ultrabook class (+19.9%) (mid).
    above class average

🎮 What it can run

⚙️ Configuration analysis

Top configuration: Intel Core i5 1135G7 · GeForce MX450 2GB · 16GB RAM
CPU: Intel Core i5 1135G7 · 11th GPU: GeForce MX450 2GB RAM: 16 GB
mainstream tier

Top configuration suits everyday productivity, light photo editing, and esports titles.

🤔 How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 51) ↔ price (median 373.2).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 64) ↔ overall performance (median 41.7).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 4.4).

ZenBook 14 UX435: verdict

+
Best for: GPU-accelerated workloads and gaming
!
Watch out for: memory may be limited

➡️ Next step

You're refining — compare finalists head-to-head.

Technical reference for ASUS ZenBook 14 UX435.

Full specifications

Brand
ASUS
Series
Zenbook
Type
Ultrabook
Release year
2021
Screen size
14"
Resolution
1920x1080
Panel type
ips
Color gamut (sRGB)
100%
RAM (max)
16 GB LPDDR4X
Weight
1.19 kg
Ports
6
Thunderbolt
Backlit keyboard
Webcam
TPM (security)
Battery
63 Wh

Performance scores

Performance
50
/100
CPU
70
/100
GPU
45
/100
USComp
57
/100

Performance metrics

Performance 50
Portability 78
Light office 65
Gaming 44
Creative 63
Energy efficiency 77
Connectivity 100
Value 64
Color accuracy 85

🎮 Gaming performance

FPS @ 1080p for the model's best GPU

Game FPS (1080p) Verdict
CS:GO 240 ✓ Комфортно
Overwatch 240 ✓ Комфортно
GTA V 140 ✓ Комфортно
PUBG: Battlegrounds 140 ✓ Комфортно
Counter-Strike 2 88 ✓ Комфортно
Dota 2 88 ✓ Комфортно
Valorant 85 ✓ Комфортно
Fortnite 61 ✓ Комфортно
Battlefield 5 49 ⚠ Играбельно
Forza Horizon 4 35 ⚠ Играбельно
Far Cry 5 34 ⚠ Играбельно
Forza Horizon 5 34 ⚠ Играбельно
The Witcher 3 33 ⚠ Играбельно
Cyberpunk 2077 32 ⚠ Играбельно
Resident Evil 4 Remake 16 ✗ Низький
Metro Exodus 10 ✗ Низький
💡 16 games in the database for this GPU. ✓ playable (≥60 FPS), ⚠ medium (30-59), ✗ low (<30).

💻 Software compatibility

Counter-Strike 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
140%
GPU
65%
RAM
200%
Grand Theft Auto V ✓ Runs well
CPU
350%
GPU
895%
RAM
400%
Cyberpunk 2077 ✓ Runs well
CPU
200%
GPU
149%
RAM
200%
Minecraft ✓ Runs well
CPU
700%
GPU
447%
RAM
400%
Fortnite ✓ Runs well
CPU
127%
GPU
280%
RAM
200%
Valorant ✓ Runs well
CPU
467%
GPU
895%
RAM
400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt ✓ Runs well
CPU
233%
GPU
179%
RAM
267%
Elden Ring ✗ Weak
CPU
127%
GPU
93%
RAM
133%
Red Dead Redemption 2 ✓ Runs well
CPU
233%
GPU
160%
RAM
200%
Apex Legends ✓ Runs well
CPU
127%
GPU
112%
RAM
267%
Hogwarts Legacy ✓ Runs well
CPU
156%
GPU
149%
RAM
100%
Dota 2 ✓ Runs well
CPU
467%
GPU
895%
RAM
400%
Baldur's Gate 3 ✓ Runs well
CPU
127%
GPU
128%
RAM
200%
Starfield ✗ Weak
CPU
100%
GPU
65%
RAM
100%
Call of Duty: Warzone ✓ Runs well
CPU
127%
GPU
128%
RAM
200%
League of Legends ✓ Runs well
CPU
700%
GPU
895%
RAM
800%
Sims 4 ✓ Runs well
CPU
467%
GPU
895%
RAM
400%
Helldivers 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
100%
GPU
69%
RAM
200%
Battlefield 5 ✓ Runs well
CPU
156%
GPU
149%
RAM
200%
Far Cry 5 ✓ Runs well
CPU
175%
GPU
203%
RAM
200%
Forza Horizon 4 ✓ Runs well
CPU
200%
GPU
249%
RAM
200%
Forza Horizon 5 ✓ Runs well
CPU
156%
GPU
128%
RAM
200%
Metro Exodus ✓ Runs well
CPU
175%
GPU
144%
RAM
200%
Overwatch ✓ Runs well
CPU
280%
GPU
895%
RAM
400%
PUBG: Battlegrounds ✓ Runs well
CPU
175%
GPU
186%
RAM
200%
Resident Evil 4 Remake ✓ Runs well
CPU
140%
GPU
109%
RAM
200%
Escape from Tarkov ✓ Runs well
CPU
233%
GPU
179%
RAM
200%
God of War ✓ Runs well
CPU
318%
GPU
186%
RAM
200%
Horizon Zero Dawn ✓ Runs well
CPU
318%
GPU
149%
RAM
200%
Death Stranding ✓ Runs well
CPU
280%
GPU
144%
RAM
200%
Control ✓ Runs well
CPU
233%
GPU
149%
RAM
200%
Doom Eternal ✓ Runs well
CPU
318%
GPU
224%
RAM
200%
Batman: Arkham Knight ✓ Runs well
CPU
389%
GPU
224%
RAM
267%
Hitman 3 ✓ Runs well
CPU
318%
GPU
224%
RAM
200%
Flight Simulator 2020 ✓ Runs well
CPU
250%
GPU
179%
RAM
200%
Watch Dogs Legion ✓ Runs well
CPU
250%
GPU
186%
RAM
200%
Borderlands 3 ✓ Runs well
CPU
280%
GPU
160%
RAM
267%
Anno 1800 ✓ Runs well
CPU
233%
GPU
224%
RAM
200%
Rainbow Six Siege ✓ Runs well
CPU
583%
GPU
447%
RAM
267%
The Division 2 ✓ Runs well
CPU
318%
GPU
179%
RAM
200%
Gears Tactics ✓ Runs well
CPU
280%
GPU
298%
RAM
200%
Hunt Showdown ✓ Runs well
CPU
250%
GPU
224%
RAM
267%
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands ✓ Runs well
CPU
233%
GPU
109%
RAM
200%
Mafia Definitive Edition ✓ Runs well
CPU
318%
GPU
224%
RAM
267%
Days Gone ✓ Runs well
CPU
318%
GPU
149%
RAM
200%
Ghostwire Tokyo ✓ Runs well
CPU
167%
GPU
186%
RAM
133%
Returnal ✓ Runs well
CPU
200%
GPU
112%
RAM
100%
Dying Light 2 ✓ Runs well
CPU
233%
GPU
109%
RAM
200%
Resident Evil Village ✓ Runs well
CPU
200%
GPU
128%
RAM
200%
The Callisto Protocol ✓ Runs well
CPU
140%
GPU
112%
RAM
200%
Atomic Heart ✓ Runs well
CPU
219%
GPU
186%
RAM
200%
Alan Wake 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
167%
GPU
69%
RAM
100%
Black Myth Wukong ✓ Runs well
CPU
140%
GPU
186%
RAM
100%
Ghost of Tsushima ✓ Runs well
CPU
140%
GPU
186%
RAM
200%
The Last of Us Part 1 ✓ Runs well
CPU
140%
GPU
112%
RAM
100%
Diablo 4 ✓ Runs well
CPU
318%
GPU
224%
RAM
200%
Spider-Man Miles Morales ✓ Runs well
CPU
233%
GPU
224%
RAM
200%
Star Wars Jedi Survivor ✗ Weak
CPU
140%
GPU
81%
RAM
200%
Dead Space Remake ✓ Runs well
CPU
219%
GPU
109%
RAM
200%
Lies of P ✓ Runs well
CPU
200%
GPU
186%
RAM
200%
Sons of the Forest ✗ Weak
CPU
140%
GPU
97%
RAM
133%
Rise of the Tomb Raider ✓ Runs well
CPU
467%
GPU
447%
RAM
400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider ✓ Runs well
CPU
389%
GPU
224%
RAM
200%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey ✓ Runs well
CPU
350%
GPU
224%
RAM
200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla ✓ Runs well
CPU
200%
GPU
186%
RAM
200%
F1 24 ✓ Runs well
CPU
389%
GPU
109%
RAM
200%
Need for Speed Heat ✓ Runs well
CPU
200%
GPU
128%
RAM
200%
Civilization 6 ✓ Runs well
CPU
467%
GPU
447%
RAM
400%
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order ✓ Runs well
CPU
389%
GPU
373%
RAM
200%

Configuration options

Available model options · 11 variants across 6 categories

🔋 Batteries (1)
63 Wh
⚙ Processors (2)
Intel Core i5 1135G7 Intel Core i7 1165G7
🖥 Displays (2)
1920 x 1080 1920 x 1080 (Touch)
🎮 Graphics (1)
GeForce MX450 2GB
🔲 Memory (2)
8GB 16GB
💾 Storage (3)
256GB 512GB 1024GB

Similar models

Explore alternatives across different angles.