Latitude 7490 vs ThinkPad X1 Carbon 6th Gen: 15 metrics compared
Latitude 7490 vs ThinkPad X1 Carbon 6th Gen: 15 metrics compared โ detailed laptop comparison: performance, mobility, price, specifications.
Advantages
- + USComp overall score (+4.0)
- + Performance (+2.7)
- + Gaming performance (+3.0)
- + Reliability (+4.0)
- + Value (+13.2)
- + GPU (+6.8)
- + Screen quality (+5.1)
- + Battery (+6 Wh)
Detailed spec comparison
| Spec |
Component A
Latitude 7490
|
Component B
ThinkPad X1 Carbon 6th Gen
|
|---|---|---|
| USComp overall score | 39.0 (+4.0) | 35.0 |
| Performance | 31.1 (+2.7) | 28.4 |
| Gaming performance | 22.0 (+3.0) | 19.0 |
| Mobility | 60.0 | 60.0 |
| Reliability | 28.0 (+4.0) | 24.0 |
| Value | 51.2 (+13.2) | 38.0 |
| Screen quality | 44.9 | 50.0 (+5.1) |
| CPU | 41.6 | 41.6 |
| GPU | 6.8 (+6.8) | 0.0 |
| Estimated price | $411 | $411 |
| Weight | 1.40 kg | 1.40 kg |
| Battery | 42 Wh | 48 Wh (+6 Wh) |
| Max RAM | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| Release year | 2017 | 2017 |
| Modernity | 46.2 | 46.2 |
The Latitude 7490 and the ThinkPad X1 Carbon 6th Gen are the premium executives of 2018: 14-inch, featherweight, business-class security and prices that have since collapsed from $1,500+ to around $410. This is the connoisseur's comparison โ both machines are excellent, and the data produces a genuine split decision rather than a blowout: 6 wins to 2 for the Latitude, with 7 axes tied.
Latitude 7490 vs ThinkPad X1 Carbon 6th Gen: specs compared
The two share a CPU class โ identical 41.6 CPU scores from the same 8th-gen U-series processors โ and identical 1.4 kg weights, which is why so many axes tie. The Latitude's wins come from configuration breadth: a higher GPU ceiling (6.8 vs 0 โ the X1C stayed integrated-only while the 7490 offered a dGPU option), better reliability scoring (28 vs 24) and a decisively better value index (51.3 vs 38, reflecting the ThinkPad's persistently higher used price for the same performance). The X1 Carbon's signature win is display quality: 50 versus 44.9 on screen scoring, its HDR-capable panel options being among the best of the era. The ThinkPad also takes the battery axis โ 48 Wh versus the Latitude's 42 Wh โ while the 7490 answers with a stiffer chassis and the era's full-size Ethernet port, which the X1C omits entirely.
Gaming performance
With gaming indices of 22 (7490, dGPU option) and 19 (X1C, integrated only), neither machine games meaningfully โ these are boardroom tools. The 7490's optional discrete GPU keeps lighter esports titles viable and nothing more; the X1C's UHD 620 is strictly for streaming. Buyers who want a premium ultrabook that also plays should step down to the T480/Latitude 5490 class instead of paying the executive premium.
Battery and portability
Dead even where it counts: both 1.4 kg, batteries within 6 Wh of each other (48 Wh X1C vs 42 Wh 7490), both USB-C charging, both genuinely all-day machines at office load. The X1C is the thinner of the two and feels it in a sleeve; the 7490 is the stiffer chassis with the better port selection (including the era's full-size Ethernet, which the X1C lacks outright).
Which to buy in 2026
The data verdict favors the Latitude 7490 on value and reliability, and its dGPU option adds a sliver of versatility. The X1 Carbon 6th Gen is the pick when the screen is the priority โ its display scoring win is the biggest sensory difference between them โ and when the thinnest possible body matters. At ~$410 both are bargains; the honest summary is that the 7490 wins on numbers, the X1C on feel, and the 7 tied axes are exactly why this pair stays a coin-flip for most buyers.
๐ค How to choose
Universal advice for any use case.
- Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) โ price (median 385.1).
- Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) โ overall performance (median 49.9).
- Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) โ battery life (median 2.9).