Model review

Lenovo ThinkPad P50 review

Lenovo ThinkPad P50 — from 2015, 2.82 kg, performance 37.

Lenovo

Technical specifications

Type Workstation
Release year 2015
Screen 15.6" · 1920x1080
Processor Intel Core i7 6700HQ
Graphics Quadro M1000M 2GB
Max. RAM 32 GB
Weight 2.82 kg

Performance scores

Performance
37
/100
CPU
47
/100
GPU
16
/100
USComp
44
/100

A 2015 workstation kept on the shelf by its price, not its performance

The ThinkPad P50 (2015) is a decade-old mobile workstation: a Quadro M1000M, 32GB of RAM and a chassis whose readings have all reached the low band — mobility at 12 against a workstation median of 36, graphics at 15.8 against 42.23, reliability at 20 against 43.5. At $272 it sits 42% below the class median, in the segment where machines trade on chassis durability and remaining runtime rather than capability. The capability sheet still clears minimum bars on Overwatch, Grand Theft Auto V and Rainbow Six Siege — with the GTA figure carrying a measured 140 fps receipt — the era's signature on the way out.

What still clears, era-scoped

Minimum-bar clears on three titles are the honest boundary of this platform: mid-2010s titles at minimum settings, nothing modern, nothing demanding. The Quadro credentials that defined the P50 expired with their driver era; what remains is a functional professional chassis with a working dGPU — the M1000M's 15.8 reading lands 63% below today's workstation median, a gap no nameplate closes.

The three low-band readings as the review

Mobility 12, graphics 15.8, reliability 20 — together they describe a machine whose purchase is a specific bet: the tank-grade ThinkPad chassis, the legacy ports, the era-correct workflow, at a price that charges mostly for the shell. The verdict's budget-friendly framing is accurate; the buyer's job is to be the person that description fits.

Depreciation: terminal flatness

From a $2,200 anchor the price has settled at $272, decaying at 8.3% per year with a two-year projection near $229. The curve is flat; the machine is worth its parts and its name, and the coming years will trim that value gently.

Against the neighbors

A Precision 5510 at $297 and a ZBook 15u G6 at $309 sit above; a Precision 3510 at $243 and a ThinkPad W541 at $251 sit below. The bracket is the museum shelf of the workstation class — same-era machines at floor prices, differentiated by chassis condition rather than measurable capability.

Bottom line

A budget-friendly pick for the narrow use case: legacy workflows, a durable chassis, era-scoped capability at floor money. Judge it as a 2015 machine with a verified receipt sheet and the price is honest; judge it as a laptop and every low-band reading will collect.

🧭 Your context

Stage: Refining requirements

You're refining — compare finalists head-to-head.

🎯 For your profile

You've viewed: You've recently viewed 20 models — compare this model with them in the analogs matrix.

⭐ What stands out

mobility
12
graphics performance
15.8
reliability
20
above median below median class median
  • mobility is lower than typical workstation class (+66.7%) (low tier).
    budget segment of category
  • graphics performance is lower than typical workstation class (+62.6%) (office tier).
    budget segment of category
  • reliability is lower than typical workstation class (+54%) (low tier).
    budget segment of category

🔁 Alternatives

Compromise axis: mobility ↔ compute power

↑ Pricier and more powerful
HP ZBook 15u G6 · $309
↓ Cheaper and less powerful

🎮 What it can run

⚙️ Configuration analysis

Top configuration: Intel Core i7 6700HQ · Quadro M1000M 2GB · 32GB RAM
CPU: Intel Core i7 6700HQ · 6th GPU: Quadro M1000M 2GB RAM: 32 GB
office tier

Top configuration is built for office apps, web browsing, and basic daily tasks.

🤔 How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 43.5) ↔ price (median 471).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 36) ↔ overall performance (median 60.6).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 100) ↔ battery life (median 2.4).

ThinkPad P50: verdict

+
Best for: a balanced profile
!
Watch out for: mobility and portability
$
Price: $272 — a budget-friendly pick

➡️ Next step

You're refining — compare finalists head-to-head.

Technical reference for Lenovo ThinkPad P50.

Full specifications

Brand
Lenovo
Series
ThinkPad P50-P53/P71-P72 (legacy ws)
Type
Workstation
Release year
2015
Screen size
15.6"
Resolution
1920x1080
Panel type
ips
Color gamut (sRGB)
100%~
RAM (max)
32 GB DDR4
Weight
2.82 kg
Ports
7
Battery
68 Wh~

Performance scores

Performance
37
/100
CPU
47
/100
GPU
16
/100
USComp
29
/100

Performance metrics

Performance 37
Portability 20
Light office 60
Gaming 31
Creative 34
Energy efficiency 53
Connectivity 100
Value 55
Color accuracy

🎮 Gaming performance

FPS @ 1080p for the model's best GPU

Game FPS (1080p) Verdict
CS:GO 240 ✓ Комфортно
Overwatch 240 ✓ Комфортно
GTA V 140 ✓ Комфортно
PUBG: Battlegrounds 140 ✓ Комфортно
F1 2014 123 ✓ Комфортно
GRID: Autosport 82 ✓ Комфортно
Valorant 70 ✓ Комфортно
Dirt Rally 62 ✓ Комфортно
Dota 2 50 ⚠ Играбельно
Rainbow Six Siege 44 ⚠ Играбельно
Fortnite 40 ⚠ Играбельно
Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor 34 ⚠ Играбельно
Anno 2205 30 ⚠ Играбельно
Battlefield 5 30 ⚠ Играбельно
Counter-Strike 2 30 ⚠ Играбельно
Forza Horizon 4 30 ⚠ Играбельно
Ryse: Son of Rome 23 ✗ Низький
Far Cry 5 21 ✗ Низький
Forza Horizon 5 20 ✗ Низький
The Witcher 3 19 ✗ Низький
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 17 ✗ Низький
Cyberpunk 2077 14 ✗ Низький
Metro Exodus 12 ✗ Низький
Resident Evil 4 Remake 12 ✗ Низький
💡 24 games in the database for this GPU. ✓ playable (≥60 FPS), ⚠ medium (30-59), ✗ low (<30).

💻 Software compatibility

Counter-Strike 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
94%
GPU
23%
RAM
400%
Grand Theft Auto V ✓ Runs well
CPU
236%
GPU
316%
RAM
800%
Cyberpunk 2077 ✗ Weak
CPU
135%
GPU
53%
RAM
400%
Minecraft ✓ Runs well
CPU
472%
GPU
158%
RAM
800%
Fortnite ✗ Weak
CPU
86%
GPU
99%
RAM
400%
Valorant ✓ Runs well
CPU
315%
GPU
316%
RAM
800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt ✗ Weak
CPU
157%
GPU
63%
RAM
533%
Elden Ring ✗ Weak
CPU
86%
GPU
33%
RAM
267%
Red Dead Redemption 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
157%
GPU
56%
RAM
400%
Apex Legends ✗ Weak
CPU
86%
GPU
40%
RAM
533%
Hogwarts Legacy ✗ Weak
CPU
105%
GPU
53%
RAM
200%
Dota 2 ✓ Runs well
CPU
315%
GPU
316%
RAM
800%
Baldur's Gate 3 ✗ Weak
CPU
86%
GPU
45%
RAM
400%
Starfield ✗ Weak
CPU
67%
GPU
23%
RAM
200%
Call of Duty: Warzone ✗ Weak
CPU
86%
GPU
45%
RAM
400%
League of Legends ✓ Runs well
CPU
472%
GPU
316%
RAM
999%
Sims 4 ✓ Runs well
CPU
315%
GPU
316%
RAM
800%
Helldivers 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
67%
GPU
24%
RAM
400%
Battlefield 5 ✗ Weak
CPU
105%
GPU
53%
RAM
400%
Far Cry 5 ✗ Weak
CPU
118%
GPU
72%
RAM
400%
Forza Horizon 4 ✗ Weak
CPU
135%
GPU
88%
RAM
400%
Forza Horizon 5 ✗ Weak
CPU
105%
GPU
45%
RAM
400%
Metro Exodus ✗ Weak
CPU
118%
GPU
51%
RAM
400%
Overwatch ✓ Runs well
CPU
189%
GPU
316%
RAM
800%
PUBG: Battlegrounds ✗ Weak
CPU
118%
GPU
66%
RAM
400%
Resident Evil 4 Remake ✗ Weak
CPU
94%
GPU
39%
RAM
400%
Escape from Tarkov ✗ Weak
CPU
157%
GPU
63%
RAM
400%
God of War ✗ Weak
CPU
215%
GPU
66%
RAM
400%
Horizon Zero Dawn ✗ Weak
CPU
215%
GPU
53%
RAM
400%
Death Stranding ✗ Weak
CPU
189%
GPU
51%
RAM
400%
Control ✗ Weak
CPU
157%
GPU
53%
RAM
400%
Doom Eternal ✗ Weak
CPU
215%
GPU
79%
RAM
400%
Batman: Arkham Knight ✗ Weak
CPU
262%
GPU
79%
RAM
533%
Hitman 3 ✗ Weak
CPU
215%
GPU
79%
RAM
400%
Flight Simulator 2020 ✗ Weak
CPU
169%
GPU
63%
RAM
400%
Watch Dogs Legion ✗ Weak
CPU
169%
GPU
66%
RAM
400%
Borderlands 3 ✗ Weak
CPU
189%
GPU
56%
RAM
533%
Anno 1800 ✗ Weak
CPU
157%
GPU
79%
RAM
400%
Rainbow Six Siege ✓ Runs well
CPU
394%
GPU
158%
RAM
533%
The Division 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
215%
GPU
63%
RAM
400%
Gears Tactics ✓ Runs well
CPU
189%
GPU
105%
RAM
400%
Hunt Showdown ✗ Weak
CPU
169%
GPU
79%
RAM
533%
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands ✗ Weak
CPU
157%
GPU
39%
RAM
400%
Mafia Definitive Edition ✗ Weak
CPU
215%
GPU
79%
RAM
533%
Days Gone ✗ Weak
CPU
215%
GPU
53%
RAM
400%
Ghostwire Tokyo ✗ Weak
CPU
112%
GPU
66%
RAM
267%
Returnal ✗ Weak
CPU
135%
GPU
40%
RAM
200%
Dying Light 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
157%
GPU
39%
RAM
400%
Resident Evil Village ✗ Weak
CPU
135%
GPU
45%
RAM
400%
The Callisto Protocol ✗ Weak
CPU
94%
GPU
40%
RAM
400%
Atomic Heart ✗ Weak
CPU
148%
GPU
66%
RAM
400%
Alan Wake 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
112%
GPU
24%
RAM
200%
Black Myth Wukong ✗ Weak
CPU
94%
GPU
66%
RAM
200%
Ghost of Tsushima ✗ Weak
CPU
94%
GPU
66%
RAM
400%
The Last of Us Part 1 ✗ Weak
CPU
94%
GPU
40%
RAM
200%
Diablo 4 ✗ Weak
CPU
215%
GPU
79%
RAM
400%
Spider-Man Miles Morales ✗ Weak
CPU
157%
GPU
79%
RAM
400%
Star Wars Jedi Survivor ✗ Weak
CPU
94%
GPU
29%
RAM
400%
Dead Space Remake ✗ Weak
CPU
148%
GPU
39%
RAM
400%
Lies of P ✗ Weak
CPU
135%
GPU
66%
RAM
400%
Sons of the Forest ✗ Weak
CPU
94%
GPU
34%
RAM
267%
Rise of the Tomb Raider ✓ Runs well
CPU
315%
GPU
158%
RAM
800%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider ✗ Weak
CPU
262%
GPU
79%
RAM
400%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey ✗ Weak
CPU
236%
GPU
79%
RAM
400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla ✗ Weak
CPU
135%
GPU
66%
RAM
400%
F1 24 ✗ Weak
CPU
262%
GPU
39%
RAM
400%
Need for Speed Heat ✗ Weak
CPU
135%
GPU
45%
RAM
400%
Civilization 6 ✓ Runs well
CPU
315%
GPU
158%
RAM
800%
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order ✓ Runs well
CPU
262%
GPU
132%
RAM
400%

Configuration options

Available model options · 3 variants across 3 categories

⚙ Processors (1)
Intel Core i7 6700HQ
🎮 Graphics (1)
Quadro M1000M 2GB
• Igpu (1)
Intel HD Graphics 520

Similar models

Explore alternatives across different angles.