Model review

HP OMEN 17t-w200 review

HP OMEN 17t-w200 — from 2017, 3.35 kg, performance 44.

HP

Technical specifications

Type Gaming
Release year 2017
Screen 17.3" · 1920x1080
Processor Intel Core i7 7700HQ
Graphics GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 4GB
Max. RAM 32 GB
Weight 3.35 kg

Performance scores

Performance
44
/100
CPU
49
/100
GPU
31
/100
USComp
44
/100

A 2017 seventeen-inch entry card, priced as a desk

The OMEN 17t-w200 (2017) puts a four-core i7-7700HQ and a GTX 1050 Ti 4GB into a seventeen-inch chassis with 32GB of RAM, at $447 — 40% below the gaming-class median. The readings describe the platform precisely: mobility at 7 against a class median of 29, reliability at 20 against 53, graphics at 31.34 against 78.49. The capability sheet still clears Overwatch, Grand Theft Auto V and Rainbow Six Siege at recommended. The identity is fixed by the intersection: entry-tier graphics, desk-bound mass, eight years of history, budget price.

What the receipts support

Three rec-bar clears keep the gaming claim honest for the era's shelf: esports titles and mid-2010s AAA at 1080p remain the confirmed envelope, with Visual Studio Code passing at minimum for light professional use. The 1050 Ti was the entry door to real gaming in 2017; the receipts confirm the door still opens, at the settings of that generation.

The cost of seventeen inches in 2017

Mobility at 7 — 76% below the class median, near the floor of the category — is the structural fact: this chassis was built to live on a desk, and the years have not lifted it. Reliability at 20 prices in the full eight-year career of a large gaming chassis. Neither number argues against the purchase at $447; both argue for knowing that the machine is bought as a stationary, era-scoped gaming appliance.

Depreciation: the terminal plateau

From a $1,800 anchor the price has settled at $447, decaying at 9.6% per year with a two-year projection near $365. The curve is in its flat final phase: value from here accrues to the user, not the reseller.

Against the neighbors

An OMEN 17t-an000 at $475 and the OMEN 15-ce018dx at $495 are the same-family seats above; an XPS 15 9560 at $422 and an IdeaPad Y700 at $410 are the same-era alternatives below. The bracket is a shelf of 2017 platforms, and this seat trades at the low end of it with the largest screen in the group.

Bottom line

A budget-friendly pick with a fixed identity: the cheapest seventeen-inch confirmed-gaming seat in its bracket, carrying the mobility and reliability readings that explain the price. Buy it for the desk and the era's games; anything else the metrics will collect.

🧭 Your context

Stage: Vague sense of need

Browse category overviews to narrow things down.

🎮 What it can run

⚙️ Configuration analysis

Top configuration: Intel Core i7 7700HQ · GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 4GB · 32GB RAM
CPU: Intel Core i7 7700HQ · 7th GPU: GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 4GB RAM: 32 GB
light tier

Top configuration is sufficient for office work, media playback, and older or undemanding games.

🤔 How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 53) ↔ price (median 749.6).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 29) ↔ overall performance (median 73.9).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 100) ↔ battery life (median 2.5).

OMEN 17t-w200: verdict

+
Best for: a balanced profile
!
Watch out for: mobility and portability
$
Price: $447 — a budget-friendly pick

➡️ Next step

Browse category overviews to narrow things down.

Technical reference for HP OMEN 17t-w200.

Full specifications

Brand
HP
Series
Omen
Type
Gaming
Release year
2017
Screen size
17.3"
Resolution
1920x1080
Panel type
ips
Color gamut (sRGB)
100%~
RAM (max)
32 GB DDR4
Weight
3.35 kg
Ports
6
Battery
80 Wh~

Performance scores

Performance
44
/100
CPU
49
/100
GPU
31
/100
USComp
31
/100

Performance metrics

Performance 44
Portability 6
Light office 60
Gaming 33
Creative 37
Energy efficiency 52
Connectivity 85
Value 49
Color accuracy
🎮

No FPS data for this model's GPU.

The GPU may be integrated or not yet benchmarked.

💻 Software compatibility

Counter-Strike 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
98%
GPU
45%
RAM
400%
Grand Theft Auto V ✓ Runs well
CPU
246%
GPU
627%
RAM
800%
Cyberpunk 2077 ✓ Runs well
CPU
140%
GPU
104%
RAM
400%
Minecraft ✓ Runs well
CPU
491%
GPU
313%
RAM
800%
Fortnite ✗ Weak
CPU
89%
GPU
196%
RAM
400%
Valorant ✓ Runs well
CPU
328%
GPU
627%
RAM
800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt ✓ Runs well
CPU
164%
GPU
125%
RAM
533%
Elden Ring ✗ Weak
CPU
89%
GPU
65%
RAM
267%
Red Dead Redemption 2 ✓ Runs well
CPU
164%
GPU
112%
RAM
400%
Apex Legends ✗ Weak
CPU
89%
GPU
78%
RAM
533%
Hogwarts Legacy ✓ Runs well
CPU
109%
GPU
104%
RAM
200%
Dota 2 ✓ Runs well
CPU
328%
GPU
627%
RAM
800%
Baldur's Gate 3 ✗ Weak
CPU
89%
GPU
90%
RAM
400%
Starfield ✗ Weak
CPU
70%
GPU
45%
RAM
200%
Call of Duty: Warzone ✗ Weak
CPU
89%
GPU
90%
RAM
400%
League of Legends ✓ Runs well
CPU
491%
GPU
627%
RAM
999%
Sims 4 ✓ Runs well
CPU
328%
GPU
627%
RAM
800%
Helldivers 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
70%
GPU
48%
RAM
400%
Battlefield 5 ✓ Runs well
CPU
109%
GPU
104%
RAM
400%
Far Cry 5 ✓ Runs well
CPU
123%
GPU
142%
RAM
400%
Forza Horizon 4 ✓ Runs well
CPU
140%
GPU
174%
RAM
400%
Forza Horizon 5 ✗ Weak
CPU
109%
GPU
90%
RAM
400%
Metro Exodus ✓ Runs well
CPU
123%
GPU
101%
RAM
400%
Overwatch ✓ Runs well
CPU
197%
GPU
627%
RAM
800%
PUBG: Battlegrounds ✓ Runs well
CPU
123%
GPU
131%
RAM
400%
Resident Evil 4 Remake ✗ Weak
CPU
98%
GPU
76%
RAM
400%
Escape from Tarkov ✓ Runs well
CPU
164%
GPU
125%
RAM
400%
God of War ✓ Runs well
CPU
223%
GPU
131%
RAM
400%
Horizon Zero Dawn ✓ Runs well
CPU
223%
GPU
104%
RAM
400%
Death Stranding ✓ Runs well
CPU
197%
GPU
101%
RAM
400%
Control ✓ Runs well
CPU
164%
GPU
104%
RAM
400%
Doom Eternal ✓ Runs well
CPU
223%
GPU
157%
RAM
400%
Batman: Arkham Knight ✓ Runs well
CPU
273%
GPU
157%
RAM
533%
Hitman 3 ✓ Runs well
CPU
223%
GPU
157%
RAM
400%
Flight Simulator 2020 ✓ Runs well
CPU
175%
GPU
125%
RAM
400%
Watch Dogs Legion ✓ Runs well
CPU
175%
GPU
131%
RAM
400%
Borderlands 3 ✓ Runs well
CPU
197%
GPU
112%
RAM
533%
Anno 1800 ✓ Runs well
CPU
164%
GPU
157%
RAM
400%
Rainbow Six Siege ✓ Runs well
CPU
409%
GPU
313%
RAM
533%
The Division 2 ✓ Runs well
CPU
223%
GPU
125%
RAM
400%
Gears Tactics ✓ Runs well
CPU
197%
GPU
209%
RAM
400%
Hunt Showdown ✓ Runs well
CPU
175%
GPU
157%
RAM
533%
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands ✗ Weak
CPU
164%
GPU
76%
RAM
400%
Mafia Definitive Edition ✓ Runs well
CPU
223%
GPU
157%
RAM
533%
Days Gone ✓ Runs well
CPU
223%
GPU
104%
RAM
400%
Ghostwire Tokyo ✓ Runs well
CPU
117%
GPU
131%
RAM
267%
Returnal ✗ Weak
CPU
140%
GPU
78%
RAM
200%
Dying Light 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
164%
GPU
76%
RAM
400%
Resident Evil Village ✗ Weak
CPU
140%
GPU
90%
RAM
400%
The Callisto Protocol ✗ Weak
CPU
98%
GPU
78%
RAM
400%
Atomic Heart ✓ Runs well
CPU
154%
GPU
131%
RAM
400%
Alan Wake 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
117%
GPU
48%
RAM
200%
Black Myth Wukong ✗ Weak
CPU
98%
GPU
131%
RAM
200%
Ghost of Tsushima ✗ Weak
CPU
98%
GPU
131%
RAM
400%
The Last of Us Part 1 ✗ Weak
CPU
98%
GPU
78%
RAM
200%
Diablo 4 ✓ Runs well
CPU
223%
GPU
157%
RAM
400%
Spider-Man Miles Morales ✓ Runs well
CPU
164%
GPU
157%
RAM
400%
Star Wars Jedi Survivor ✗ Weak
CPU
98%
GPU
57%
RAM
400%
Dead Space Remake ✗ Weak
CPU
154%
GPU
76%
RAM
400%
Lies of P ✓ Runs well
CPU
140%
GPU
131%
RAM
400%
Sons of the Forest ✗ Weak
CPU
98%
GPU
68%
RAM
267%
Rise of the Tomb Raider ✓ Runs well
CPU
328%
GPU
313%
RAM
800%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider ✓ Runs well
CPU
273%
GPU
157%
RAM
400%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey ✓ Runs well
CPU
246%
GPU
157%
RAM
400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla ✓ Runs well
CPU
140%
GPU
131%
RAM
400%
F1 24 ✗ Weak
CPU
273%
GPU
76%
RAM
400%
Need for Speed Heat ✗ Weak
CPU
140%
GPU
90%
RAM
400%
Civilization 6 ✓ Runs well
CPU
328%
GPU
313%
RAM
800%
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order ✓ Runs well
CPU
273%
GPU
261%
RAM
400%

Configuration options

Available model options · 3 variants across 3 categories

⚙ Processors (1)
Intel Core i7 7700HQ
🎮 Graphics (1)
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 4GB
• Igpu (1)
Intel HD Graphics 620

Similar models

Explore alternatives across different angles.