HP OMEN 16-xf0033dx review
HP OMEN 16-xf0033dx — from 2023, 3.2 kg, performance 88.
Technical specifications
| Type | Gaming |
| Release year | 2023 |
| Screen | 16" · 1920x1080 |
| Processor | Intel Core i5 13420H , Intel Core i5 13500H , Intel Core i7 13620H , Intel Core i7 13700HX , Intel Core i9 13900HX , AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS , AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS , AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS |
| Graphics | GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile 6GB , GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile 6GB , GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile 8GB , GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile 8GB , GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile 12GB , GeForce RTX 4070 8GB |
| Max. RAM | 64 GB |
| Weight | 3.2 kg |
Performance scores
An enthusiast CPU in a premium-priced 3050 ticket
The OMEN 16-xf0033dx (2023) asks $1,593 — 112% above the gaming-class median — for a combination of an eight-core i5-13420H, an RTX 3050 6GB and 64GB of RAM. The CPU reading justifies part of the ticket: 87.98 against a 65.01 median, enthusiast tier, top quartile. But the graphics stay at 3050-class, and the weight reading of 3.2 kg sits 33% above the class median in desktop-replacement territory. The premium is real; the question the data poses is where exactly it went.
Where the money visibly went
The enthusiast CPU is the receipt: compute-heavy work — compiling, encoding, heavy multitasking — runs at top-quartile pace, and the capability sheet extends it with Adobe Premiere Pro and Photoshop at minimum plus Visual Studio Code at recommended, alongside the rec-bar gaming trio of Overwatch, GTA V and Rainbow Six Siege. The 3050 6GB handles 1080p gaming competently; it simply is not what a $1,593 ticket usually buys in this class.
The honest ledger
Three facts frame the value question. First, a sibling listing of the same silicon — the OMEN 16-XF0026NO at $1,358 — undercuts this seat by $235 for the identical platform. Second, the 3.2 kg weight is among the heaviest in the class: the machine pays the desktop-replacement carry tax without desktop-replacement graphics. Third, the depreciation pace is steep at 16.3% per year, projecting to $1,117 in two years. The combination reads as a price set by the chassis and the CPU, not by the GPU that defines the gaming class.
Depreciation: recent-silicon pace
The two-year projection implies a further 30% drop from here. Buyers at this tier pay for the newest years of a machine's life; the resale market will discount those same years quickly. That is the standard risk of 2023 silicon at a premium price, sharpened by the sibling listing's lower anchor.
Against the neighbors
Above, an Alienware m18 R1 AMD at $1,762 and an m18 R1 at $1,689 offer dramatically more machine for $96-169 more. Below, the XF0026NO sibling at $1,358 and an OMEN 17 at $1,509 crowd the same platform from underneath. In that company the listing's specific pitch narrows to condition and listing quality; on silicon alone the data favors both neighbors.
Bottom line
The machine itself is a competent enthusiast-CPU gaming laptop with honest receipts. The pricing is what the data questions: fairly priced only if the buyer values the 13420H's compute and the chassis at close to $1,600, and can explain why the identical sibling at $1,358 is not the better seat.
🧭 Your context
Stage: Refining requirements
You're refining — compare finalists head-to-head.
🎯 For your profile
You've viewed: You've recently viewed 33 models — compare this model with them in the analogs matrix.
⭐ What stands out
-
price is higher than typical gaming class (+112.5%) (premium).
top 25% of its category -
CPU performance is higher than typical gaming class (+35.3%) (enthusiast tier).
top 25% of its category -
weight is higher than typical gaming class (+33.3%) (desktop replacement).
top 25% of its category
🔁 Alternatives
Compromise axis: mobility ↔ overall performance
🎮 What it can run
⚙️ Configuration analysis
Top configuration easily handles AAA games at ultra settings, 4K video editing, and engineering applications.
🤔 How to choose
Universal advice for any use case.
- Reliability vs price: reliability (median 53) ↔ price (median 749.6).
- Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 29) ↔ overall performance (median 73.9).
- Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 100) ↔ battery life (median 2.5).
OMEN 16-xf0033dx: verdict
➡️ Next step
You're refining — compare finalists head-to-head.