HP OMEN 17-ck2095cl review
HP OMEN 17-ck2095cl — from 2023, 2.7 kg, performance 79.
Technical specifications
| Type | Gaming |
| Release year | 2023 |
| Screen | 17.3" · 2560x1440 |
| Processor | Intel Core i7 12700H , Intel Core i7 12800HX , Intel Core i9 13900HX |
| Graphics | GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile 6GB , GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile 8GB , GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile 16GB , GeForce RTX 4080 12GB |
| Max. RAM | 64 GB |
| Weight | 2.7 kg |
Performance scores
The sane seat of the ultra-premium 3060 pair
The HP OMEN 17-ck2095cl (2023) lists at $2,171 against a $749.56 gaming median — 189.7% above typical, the ultra-premium band. The configuration: a fourteen-core i7 12700H, an RTX 3060 with 6GB, and 64GB of RAM. The measurement engine returns null on both scans — no top strength, no top weakness — the profile of a machine that lands at the class's center on every axis. What makes the listing coherent is its twin: the OMEN 17-ck2099ng, identical silicon, at $2,725.58.
Class-average readings, enthusiast-band GPU
The graphics score of 82.83 sits 5.5% above the class median — typical placing, but in absolute terms the enthusiast band and top quartile. The CPU score of 67.62 runs 4% above typical. The capability sheet clears the full tested set: Overwatch, Grand Theft Auto V, and Rainbow Six Siege at recommended, Adobe Photoshop and Visual Studio Code at minimum. A complete, verified, thoroughly average-flagship package.
The honest question: the altitude, not the hardware
Both null readings are honest peer-comparison data — nothing stands out against the class, nothing falls behind it — while the absolute levels name two low-band facts plainly: portability (6), the physics of a 2.8kg seventeen-inch body, and value-for-money (35), the shadow of the ultra-premium ticket. The question this seat poses is price: $2,171 for 3060-class silicon in a class where the median seat costs $750. The in-family twin at $2,725.58 makes this listing look reasonable only by standing next to it; against the Alienware m16 R1 at $2,050.84 — a catalog-flagship machine at a lower price — the premium remains hard to justify on measurements alone. The buyer needs a reason the data cannot see.
Depreciation: high base, standard curve
From a $1,800 anchor, the listing sits above anchor — a used-market premium — with a 16.26% annualized decline projecting to $1,523 in two years, a further 29.87%. Roughly $648 of exposure over two years: the standard ultra-premium arithmetic, less brutal than the twin's only because the base is lower.
Against its neighbors
Above it: the Alienware m18 R2 at $2,484.60. Below it: the Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H and the Alienware m16 R1 at $2,050.84 each. The band is thin and flagship-dense; this seat is the cheaper of the two identical-silicon listings and the weaker-GPU option against the Legion Pro 7.
Bottom line
Fairly priced against its twin, awkwardly priced against its band: verified class-average flagship hardware at nearly three times the class median. Take it over the ck2099ng every time — the $554 saving is pure arbitrage on identical silicon — but check the m16 R1 seat one row down first, because a catalog flagship sells for less there.
🧭 Your context
Stage: Refining requirements
You're refining — compare finalists head-to-head.
🎯 For your profile
You've viewed: You've recently viewed 32 models — compare this model with them in the analogs matrix.
⭐ What stands out
-
price is higher than typical gaming class (+189.7%) (ultra-premium).
top 25% of its category -
CPU performance is in line with typical gaming class (mainstream tier).
above class average -
graphics performance is in line with typical gaming class (enthusiast tier).
top 25% of its category
🔁 Alternatives
Compromise axis: mobility ↔ overall performance
🎮 What it can run
⚙️ Configuration analysis
Top configuration easily handles AAA games at ultra settings, 4K video editing, and engineering applications.
🤔 How to choose
Universal advice for any use case.
- Reliability vs price: reliability (median 53) ↔ price (median 749.6).
- Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 29) ↔ overall performance (median 73.9).
- Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 100) ↔ battery life (median 2.5).
OMEN 17-ck2095cl: verdict
➡️ Next step
You're refining — compare finalists head-to-head.