HP OMEN 17-ck2099ng review
HP OMEN 17-ck2099ng — from 2023, 2.8 kg, performance 79.
Technical specifications
| Type | Gaming |
| Release year | 2023 |
| Screen | 17.3" · 2560x1440 |
| Processor | Intel Core i7 12700H , Intel Core i7 12800HX , Intel Core i9 13900HX |
| Graphics | GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile 6GB , GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile 8GB , GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile 16GB , GeForce RTX 4090 16GB |
| Max. RAM | 64 GB |
| Weight | 2.8 kg |
Performance scores
Ultra-premium money for mid-flagship silicon
The HP OMEN 17-ck2099ng (2023) is among the most expensive listings in this catalog's gaming class: $2,726 against a $749.56 median — 263.6% above typical, the ultra-premium band. The configuration underneath that price is a fourteen-core i7 12700H, an RTX 3060 with 6GB, and 64GB of RAM — good silicon, and clearly not $2,700 of silicon. The measured weakness is weight: 2.8kg, in the heavy quartile. The story of this seat is the gap between the price tag and the parts list.
What the measurements support
The capability sheet is green and complete: Overwatch, Grand Theft Auto V, and Rainbow Six Siege clear recommended, with Adobe Photoshop and Visual Studio Code passing at minimum. The graphics score of 82.83 is an enthusiast-band, top-quartile reading — 5.5% above the class median — and the CPU places typically. By capability alone this is a solid 3060 machine; nothing in the data reads as flagship-of-2026.
The honest flag: the premium is not in the silicon
The comparison set is blunt: the Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 6 at $2,340.02 and the Alienware 16X Aurora at $2,340.02 both list below this seat, and the OMEN 17-ck2095cl — the same 12700H, the same 3060, the same 64GB — lists at $2,171.33, which is $554.25 less for identical measured performance. Whatever this listing's $2,726 buys — condition, provenance, seller positioning — the data says it is not graphics, CPU, memory, or portability. The 6GB VRAM ceiling in particular ages faster than a $2,700 ticket implies.
Depreciation: the largest exposure on the shelf
From a $1,800 anchor, the listing prices above its anchor — a used-market anomaly — and the 16.26% annualized decline projects to $1,911 in two years, a further 29.87%. In absolute terms that is roughly $815 of value at risk, among the largest exposures of any seat in this catalog's gaming class. Steep curve, high base, identical silicon available cheaper.
Against its neighbors
Above it: only the Dell XPS 16 9640 at $2,966.56. Below it: the ThinkPad P1 Gen 6 and Alienware 16X Aurora at $2,340.02 each, and the in-family twin ck2095cl at $2,171.33. Every comparison at this altitude prices stronger or equal silicon for less.
Bottom line
By capability this is a fairly priced 3060 machine at the wrong altitude. The measured package — enthusiast-band GPU, typical CPU, median memory, full green sheet — is real and verified, and available for $554 less one listing over. Buy this seat only for reasons the data cannot see; on the data, the twin wins outright.
🧭 Your context
Stage: Refining requirements
You're refining — compare finalists head-to-head.
🎯 For your profile
You've viewed: You've recently viewed 11 models — compare this model with them in the analogs matrix.
⭐ What stands out
-
price is higher than typical gaming class (+200%) (ultra-premium).
top 25% of its category -
weight is higher than typical gaming class (+16.7%) (heavy).
top 25% of its category
🔁 Alternatives
Compromise axis: mobility ↔ overall performance
🎮 What it can run
⚙️ Configuration analysis
Top configuration easily handles AAA games at ultra settings, 4K video editing, and engineering applications.
🤔 How to choose
Universal advice for any use case.
- Reliability vs price: reliability (median 53) ↔ price (median 749.6).
- Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 29) ↔ overall performance (median 73.9).
- Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 100) ↔ battery life (median 2.5).
OMEN 17-ck2099ng: verdict
➡️ Next step
You're refining — compare finalists head-to-head.