Model review

HP ZBook 17 G1 review

HP ZBook 17 G1 — from 2013, 3.41 kg, performance 20.

HP

Technical specifications

Type Workstation
Release year 2013
Screen 17.3" · 1920x1080
Processor Intel Core i7 4600M
Graphics Quadro K3100M 4GB
Max. RAM 16 GB
Weight 3.41 kg

Performance scores

Performance
20
/100
CPU
32
/100
GPU
7
/100
USComp
27
/100

A 2013 flagship whose credentials have expired

The HP ZBook 17 G1 (2013) is a twelve-year-old workstation listing at $266 against a $471 class median — the ultra-budget seat. Its 2013 configuration reads today as archaeology: a dual-core i7 4600M, a Quadro K3100M with 4GB, and 16GB of RAM. Every headline reading sits at the floor: graphics 7.27 (82.8% below median), reliability 8 (81.6% below), mobility 5 (86.1% below). The era of this machine's professional relevance has closed; what remains is a specific, narrow question of what its flags still permit.

What the flags permit — and what they retire

The capability sheet is mixed, and the mix is the honest story. Overwatch and Grand Theft Auto V clear at minimum — GTA with a measured 140 fps figure on record — but Far Cry 5 fails its minimum bar outright. That is a machine that clears some decade-appropriate titles at their floors while failing anything modern. The claims that survive are minimum-level, era-scoped claims: light esports and old libraries, nothing more ambitious.

The honest accounting of a floor-tier listing

Weight and mobility place it among the heaviest, least portable machines in the class — a 2013 seventeen-inch body that was never meant to travel light and now measures in single digits on mobility. Reliability of 8 says the remaining service horizon is short and should be treated as such. At $266 the buyer is purchasing a fixed-position machine for tasks its flags explicitly confirm, with longevity priced as unknown rather than assumed.

Depreciation: the flattest curve on the shelf

From a $2,200 anchor to $266 is a 7.08% annualized decline, projecting to $229 in two years — a further 13.65%, the gentlest remaining curve in the corridor. There is almost no price risk left because there is almost no price left. The financial case is trivial; the capability case is the whole decision.

Against its neighbors

Below it: the ZBook 17 G2 at $228.27 and the ThinkPad W541 at $250.98. Above it: the Dell Precision 7520 at $288.47 and the Precision 5510 at $297.36 — both generations newer for roughly $25–30 more. That comparison is decisive: the same money buys substantially newer silicon one step up the shelf.

Bottom line

A budget-friendly pick only for a buyer with a specific, minimum-level use case the flags confirm — an old-title machine, a single-purpose terminal, a spare. The Quadro credentials have expired, Far Cry 5 fails at minimum, and reliability measures single digits. For $25 more, the newer seats nearby are the rational default.

🧭 Your context

Stage: Refining requirements

You're refining — compare finalists head-to-head.

🎯 For your profile

You've viewed: You've recently viewed 21 models — compare this model with them in the analogs matrix.

⭐ What stands out

mobility
5
graphics performance
7.3
reliability
8
above median below median class median
  • mobility is lower than typical workstation class (+86.1%) (low tier).
    budget segment of category
  • graphics performance is lower than typical workstation class (+82.8%) (office tier).
    budget segment of category
  • reliability is lower than typical workstation class (+81.6%) (low tier).
    budget segment of category

🔁 Alternatives

Compromise axis: mobility ↔ compute power

↑ Pricier and more powerful
↓ Cheaper and less powerful
HP ZBook 17 G2 · $228

🎮 What it can run

⚙️ Configuration analysis

Top configuration: Intel Core i7 4600M · Quadro K3100M 4GB · 16GB RAM
CPU: Intel Core i7 4600M · 4th GPU: Quadro K3100M 4GB RAM: 16 GB
office tier

Top configuration is built for office apps, web browsing, and basic daily tasks.

🤔 How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 43.5) ↔ price (median 471).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 36) ↔ overall performance (median 60.6).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 100) ↔ battery life (median 2.4).

ZBook 17 G1: verdict

+
Best for: a balanced profile
!
Watch out for: mobility and portability
$
Price: $266 — a budget-friendly pick

➡️ Next step

You're refining — compare finalists head-to-head.

Technical reference for HP ZBook 17 G1.

Full specifications

Brand
HP
Series
ZBook (workstation)
Type
Workstation
Release year
2013
Screen size
17.3"
Resolution
1920x1080
Panel type
tn
Color gamut (sRGB)
100%~
RAM (max)
16 GB DDR3
Weight
3.41 kg
Ports
9
Battery
68 Wh~

Performance scores

Performance
20
/100
CPU
32
/100
GPU
7
/100
USComp
20
/100

Performance metrics

Performance 20
Portability 6
Light office 33
Gaming 24
Creative 31
Energy efficiency 39
Connectivity 100
Value 34
Color accuracy

🎮 Gaming performance

FPS @ 1080p for the model's best GPU

Game FPS (1080p) Verdict
CS:GO 240 ✓ Комфортно
Overwatch 240 ✓ Комфортно
GTA V 140 ✓ Комфортно
PUBG: Battlegrounds 140 ✓ Комфортно
F1 2014 108 ✓ Комфортно
GRID: Autosport 70 ✓ Комфортно
Sims 4 65 ✓ Комфортно
Valorant 65 ✓ Комфортно
Alien: Isolation 48 ⚠ Играбельно
Dirt Rally 45 ⚠ Играбельно
Dota 2 45 ⚠ Играбельно
Battlefield Hardline 34 ⚠ Играбельно
Fortnite 30 ⚠ Играбельно
Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare 28 ✗ Низький
Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor 28 ✗ Низький
Battlefield 5 24 ✗ Низький
Counter-Strike 2 24 ✗ Низький
Forza Horizon 4 24 ✗ Низький
Evolve 23 ✗ Низький
Far Cry 4 23 ✗ Низький
Dragon Age: Inquisition 22 ✗ Низький
Watch Dogs 21 ✗ Низький
Ryse: Son of Rome 19 ✗ Низький
Assassin's Creed Unity 18 ✗ Низький
Batman: Arkham Knight 17 ✗ Низький
Far Cry 5 16 ✗ Низький
Forza Horizon 5 16 ✗ Низький
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14 ✗ Низький
The Witcher 3 14 ✗ Низький
Cyberpunk 2077 10 ✗ Низький
Metro Exodus 10 ✗ Низький
Resident Evil 4 Remake 9 ✗ Низький
💡 32 games in the database for this GPU. ✓ playable (≥60 FPS), ⚠ medium (30-59), ✗ low (<30).

💻 Software compatibility

Counter-Strike 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
64%
GPU
11%
RAM
200%
Grand Theft Auto V ✓ Runs well
CPU
160%
GPU
145%
RAM
400%
Cyberpunk 2077 ✗ Weak
CPU
91%
GPU
24%
RAM
200%
Minecraft ✗ Weak
CPU
319%
GPU
73%
RAM
400%
Fortnite ✗ Weak
CPU
58%
GPU
45%
RAM
200%
Valorant ✓ Runs well
CPU
213%
GPU
145%
RAM
400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt ✗ Weak
CPU
106%
GPU
29%
RAM
267%
Elden Ring ✗ Weak
CPU
58%
GPU
15%
RAM
133%
Red Dead Redemption 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
106%
GPU
26%
RAM
200%
Apex Legends ✗ Weak
CPU
58%
GPU
18%
RAM
267%
Hogwarts Legacy ✗ Weak
CPU
71%
GPU
24%
RAM
100%
Dota 2 ✓ Runs well
CPU
213%
GPU
145%
RAM
400%
Baldur's Gate 3 ✗ Weak
CPU
58%
GPU
21%
RAM
200%
Starfield ✗ Weak
CPU
46%
GPU
11%
RAM
100%
Call of Duty: Warzone ✗ Weak
CPU
58%
GPU
21%
RAM
200%
League of Legends ✓ Runs well
CPU
319%
GPU
145%
RAM
800%
Sims 4 ✓ Runs well
CPU
213%
GPU
145%
RAM
400%
Helldivers 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
46%
GPU
11%
RAM
200%
Battlefield 5 ✗ Weak
CPU
71%
GPU
24%
RAM
200%
Far Cry 5 ✗ Weak
CPU
80%
GPU
33%
RAM
200%
Forza Horizon 4 ✗ Weak
CPU
91%
GPU
40%
RAM
200%
Forza Horizon 5 ✗ Weak
CPU
71%
GPU
21%
RAM
200%
Metro Exodus ✗ Weak
CPU
80%
GPU
23%
RAM
200%
Overwatch ✓ Runs well
CPU
128%
GPU
145%
RAM
400%
PUBG: Battlegrounds ✗ Weak
CPU
80%
GPU
30%
RAM
200%
Resident Evil 4 Remake ✗ Weak
CPU
64%
GPU
18%
RAM
200%
Escape from Tarkov ✗ Weak
CPU
106%
GPU
29%
RAM
200%
God of War ✗ Weak
CPU
145%
GPU
30%
RAM
200%
Horizon Zero Dawn ✗ Weak
CPU
145%
GPU
24%
RAM
200%
Death Stranding ✗ Weak
CPU
128%
GPU
23%
RAM
200%
Control ✗ Weak
CPU
106%
GPU
24%
RAM
200%
Doom Eternal ✗ Weak
CPU
145%
GPU
36%
RAM
200%
Batman: Arkham Knight ✗ Weak
CPU
177%
GPU
36%
RAM
267%
Hitman 3 ✗ Weak
CPU
145%
GPU
36%
RAM
200%
Flight Simulator 2020 ✗ Weak
CPU
114%
GPU
29%
RAM
200%
Watch Dogs Legion ✗ Weak
CPU
114%
GPU
30%
RAM
200%
Borderlands 3 ✗ Weak
CPU
128%
GPU
26%
RAM
267%
Anno 1800 ✗ Weak
CPU
106%
GPU
36%
RAM
200%
Rainbow Six Siege ✗ Weak
CPU
266%
GPU
73%
RAM
267%
The Division 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
145%
GPU
29%
RAM
200%
Gears Tactics ✗ Weak
CPU
128%
GPU
48%
RAM
200%
Hunt Showdown ✗ Weak
CPU
114%
GPU
36%
RAM
267%
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands ✗ Weak
CPU
106%
GPU
18%
RAM
200%
Mafia Definitive Edition ✗ Weak
CPU
145%
GPU
36%
RAM
267%
Days Gone ✗ Weak
CPU
145%
GPU
24%
RAM
200%
Ghostwire Tokyo ✗ Weak
CPU
76%
GPU
30%
RAM
133%
Returnal ✗ Weak
CPU
91%
GPU
18%
RAM
100%
Dying Light 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
106%
GPU
18%
RAM
200%
Resident Evil Village ✗ Weak
CPU
91%
GPU
21%
RAM
200%
The Callisto Protocol ✗ Weak
CPU
64%
GPU
18%
RAM
200%
Atomic Heart ✗ Weak
CPU
100%
GPU
30%
RAM
200%
Alan Wake 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
76%
GPU
11%
RAM
100%
Black Myth Wukong ✗ Weak
CPU
64%
GPU
30%
RAM
100%
Ghost of Tsushima ✗ Weak
CPU
64%
GPU
30%
RAM
200%
The Last of Us Part 1 ✗ Weak
CPU
64%
GPU
18%
RAM
100%
Diablo 4 ✗ Weak
CPU
145%
GPU
36%
RAM
200%
Spider-Man Miles Morales ✗ Weak
CPU
106%
GPU
36%
RAM
200%
Star Wars Jedi Survivor ✗ Weak
CPU
64%
GPU
13%
RAM
200%
Dead Space Remake ✗ Weak
CPU
100%
GPU
18%
RAM
200%
Lies of P ✗ Weak
CPU
91%
GPU
30%
RAM
200%
Sons of the Forest ✗ Weak
CPU
64%
GPU
16%
RAM
133%
Rise of the Tomb Raider ✗ Weak
CPU
213%
GPU
73%
RAM
400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider ✗ Weak
CPU
177%
GPU
36%
RAM
200%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey ✗ Weak
CPU
160%
GPU
36%
RAM
200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla ✗ Weak
CPU
91%
GPU
30%
RAM
200%
F1 24 ✗ Weak
CPU
177%
GPU
18%
RAM
200%
Need for Speed Heat ✗ Weak
CPU
91%
GPU
21%
RAM
200%
Civilization 6 ✗ Weak
CPU
213%
GPU
73%
RAM
400%
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order ✗ Weak
CPU
177%
GPU
61%
RAM
200%

Configuration options

Available model options · 3 variants across 3 categories

⚙ Processors (1)
Intel Core i7 4600M
🎮 Graphics (1)
Quadro K3100M 4GB
• Igpu (1)
Intel HD Graphics 4400

Similar models

Explore alternatives across different angles.