Model review

Lenovo ThinkPad X240 review

Lenovo ThinkPad X240 — from 2013, 1.36 kg, performance 15.

Lenovo

Technical specifications

Type Business
Release year 2013
Screen 12.5" · 1366x768
Processor Intel Core i7 4600U
Max. RAM 16 GB
Weight 1.36 kg

Performance scores

Performance
15
/100
CPU
27
/100
GPU
0
/100
USComp
36
/100

A 1.36 kg carry-first ThinkPad from the Haswell era

The ThinkPad X240 (2013) is built around one idea that still holds: carrying it is nearly free. At 1.36 kg it sits 15 percent under the business-class median of 1.6 kg, and that featherweight chassis is the machine's measured top strength. Around it, the years have taken their toll — the Core i7 4600U posts a performance index of 14.9 against a median of 41.5, reliability reads 13 against 42.5, and the graphics silicon of the era scores nothing against today's baseline. At $142 you are buying a light, honest typing machine, not a performer.

The strength is the carry, the ceiling is the silicon

The X240's value case is the subnotebook form factor: the i7 4600U with 16GB of RAM handles documents, mail, and browsing comfortably in single-stream work. But three axes read far below their peers — performance, reliability, and graphics — and no game or software coverage was measured for this configuration. The honest scope is classic light business: text, tabs, and a full day of portability, with no gaming or GPU-adjacent ambition on the table.

A decadelong slide in price

The depreciation record is textbook for a premium business line: from a $1,300 launch price down to $142 today, a steady 6.23 percent per year, with a projected $125 (a further 12.1 percent) two years out. The curve has flattened — most of the value loss is already behind this machine.

Against its price neighbors

In the $122–163 band the X240 competes with the HP 250 G7 at $155 and ProBook 450 G1 at $152 above it, and the 250 G3 at $122 and ProBook 430 G2 at $132 below. The ThinkPad offers the lightest chassis and the best keyboard of that group; the newer budget units offer newer (if still modest) silicon. None of these neighbors will outrun the other in any meaningful way — the differentiator is the carry weight.

Bottom line

For a writer, a student, or anyone whose workload is text and tabs and whose priority is a bag that stays light, the X240 at $142 delivers its one measured strength honestly. Treat it as a purchase of portability and a proven chassis — with performance expectations set firmly in the 2013 bracket, and no gaming claims made.

🧭 Your context

Stage: Refining requirements

You're refining — compare finalists head-to-head.

🎯 For your profile

You've viewed: You've recently viewed 6 models — compare this model with them in the analogs matrix.

⭐ What stands out

graphics performance
reliability
13
overall performance
14.9
above median below median class median
  • graphics performance absent (no data or feature not provided).
  • reliability is lower than typical business class (+69.4%) (low tier).
    budget segment of category
  • overall performance is lower than typical business class (+64.1%) (low tier).
    budget segment of category

🔁 Alternatives

Compromise axis: reliability ↔ price

↑ Pricier and more powerful
HP 250 G7 Grey · $155
↓ Cheaper and less powerful
HP 250 G3 · $122

⚙️ Configuration analysis

Top configuration: Intel Core i7 4600U · 16GB RAM
CPU: Intel Core i7 4600U · 4th RAM: 16 GB
office tier

Top configuration is built for office apps, web browsing, and basic daily tasks.

🤔 How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 42.5) ↔ price (median 297.4).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 60) ↔ overall performance (median 41.5).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 62.5) ↔ battery life (median 3.3).

ThinkPad X240: verdict

+
Best for: light weight
!
Watch out for: gaming and GPU-accelerated tasks
$
Price: $142 — worth the asking price

➡️ Next step

You're refining — compare finalists head-to-head.

Technical reference for Lenovo ThinkPad X240.

Full specifications

Brand
Lenovo
Series
ThinkPad X13/X2xx/X3xx/X9
Type
Business
Release year
2013
Screen size
12.5"
Resolution
1366x768
Panel type
tn
Color gamut (sRGB)
100%~
RAM (max)
16 GB DDR3
Weight
1.36 kg
Ports
6
Battery
48 Wh~

Performance scores

Performance
15
/100
CPU
27
/100
GPU
0
/100
USComp
24
/100

Performance metrics

Performance 15
Portability 85
Light office 23
Gaming 59
Creative 12
Energy efficiency 55
Connectivity 80
Value 44
Color accuracy
🎮

No FPS data for this model's GPU.

The GPU may be integrated or not yet benchmarked.

💻 Software compatibility

Counter-Strike 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
54%
GPU
0%
RAM
200%
Grand Theft Auto V ✗ Weak
CPU
135%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Cyberpunk 2077 ✗ Weak
CPU
77%
GPU
0%
RAM
200%
Minecraft ✗ Weak
CPU
269%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Fortnite ✗ Weak
CPU
49%
GPU
0%
RAM
200%
Valorant ✗ Weak
CPU
180%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt ✗ Weak
CPU
90%
GPU
0%
RAM
267%
Elden Ring ✗ Weak
CPU
49%
GPU
0%
RAM
133%
Red Dead Redemption 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
90%
GPU
0%
RAM
200%
Apex Legends ✗ Weak
CPU
49%
GPU
0%
RAM
267%
Hogwarts Legacy ✗ Weak
CPU
60%
GPU
0%
RAM
100%
Dota 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
180%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Baldur's Gate 3 ✗ Weak
CPU
49%
GPU
0%
RAM
200%
Starfield ✗ Weak
CPU
38%
GPU
0%
RAM
100%
Call of Duty: Warzone ✗ Weak
CPU
49%
GPU
0%
RAM
200%
League of Legends ✗ Weak
CPU
269%
GPU
0%
RAM
800%
Sims 4 ✗ Weak
CPU
180%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Helldivers 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
38%
GPU
0%
RAM
200%
Battlefield 5 ✗ Weak
CPU
60%
GPU
0%
RAM
200%
Far Cry 5 ✗ Weak
CPU
67%
GPU
0%
RAM
200%
Forza Horizon 4 ✗ Weak
CPU
77%
GPU
0%
RAM
200%
Forza Horizon 5 ✗ Weak
CPU
60%
GPU
0%
RAM
200%
Metro Exodus ✗ Weak
CPU
67%
GPU
0%
RAM
200%
Overwatch ✗ Weak
CPU
108%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
PUBG: Battlegrounds ✗ Weak
CPU
67%
GPU
0%
RAM
200%
Resident Evil 4 Remake ✗ Weak
CPU
54%
GPU
0%
RAM
200%
Escape from Tarkov ✗ Weak
CPU
90%
GPU
0%
RAM
200%
God of War ✗ Weak
CPU
122%
GPU
0%
RAM
200%
Horizon Zero Dawn ✗ Weak
CPU
122%
GPU
0%
RAM
200%
Death Stranding ✗ Weak
CPU
108%
GPU
0%
RAM
200%
Control ✗ Weak
CPU
90%
GPU
0%
RAM
200%
Doom Eternal ✗ Weak
CPU
122%
GPU
0%
RAM
200%
Batman: Arkham Knight ✗ Weak
CPU
150%
GPU
0%
RAM
267%
Hitman 3 ✗ Weak
CPU
122%
GPU
0%
RAM
200%
Flight Simulator 2020 ✗ Weak
CPU
96%
GPU
0%
RAM
200%
Watch Dogs Legion ✗ Weak
CPU
96%
GPU
0%
RAM
200%
Borderlands 3 ✗ Weak
CPU
108%
GPU
0%
RAM
267%
Anno 1800 ✗ Weak
CPU
90%
GPU
0%
RAM
200%
Rainbow Six Siege ✗ Weak
CPU
225%
GPU
0%
RAM
267%
The Division 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
122%
GPU
0%
RAM
200%
Gears Tactics ✗ Weak
CPU
108%
GPU
0%
RAM
200%
Hunt Showdown ✗ Weak
CPU
96%
GPU
0%
RAM
267%
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands ✗ Weak
CPU
90%
GPU
0%
RAM
200%
Mafia Definitive Edition ✗ Weak
CPU
122%
GPU
0%
RAM
267%
Days Gone ✗ Weak
CPU
122%
GPU
0%
RAM
200%
Ghostwire Tokyo ✗ Weak
CPU
64%
GPU
0%
RAM
133%
Returnal ✗ Weak
CPU
77%
GPU
0%
RAM
100%
Dying Light 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
90%
GPU
0%
RAM
200%
Resident Evil Village ✗ Weak
CPU
77%
GPU
0%
RAM
200%
The Callisto Protocol ✗ Weak
CPU
54%
GPU
0%
RAM
200%
Atomic Heart ✗ Weak
CPU
84%
GPU
0%
RAM
200%
Alan Wake 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
64%
GPU
0%
RAM
100%
Black Myth Wukong ✗ Weak
CPU
54%
GPU
0%
RAM
100%
Ghost of Tsushima ✗ Weak
CPU
54%
GPU
0%
RAM
200%
The Last of Us Part 1 ✗ Weak
CPU
54%
GPU
0%
RAM
100%
Diablo 4 ✗ Weak
CPU
122%
GPU
0%
RAM
200%
Spider-Man Miles Morales ✗ Weak
CPU
90%
GPU
0%
RAM
200%
Star Wars Jedi Survivor ✗ Weak
CPU
54%
GPU
0%
RAM
200%
Dead Space Remake ✗ Weak
CPU
84%
GPU
0%
RAM
200%
Lies of P ✗ Weak
CPU
77%
GPU
0%
RAM
200%
Sons of the Forest ✗ Weak
CPU
54%
GPU
0%
RAM
133%
Rise of the Tomb Raider ✗ Weak
CPU
180%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider ✗ Weak
CPU
150%
GPU
0%
RAM
200%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey ✗ Weak
CPU
135%
GPU
0%
RAM
200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla ✗ Weak
CPU
77%
GPU
0%
RAM
200%
F1 24 ✗ Weak
CPU
150%
GPU
0%
RAM
200%
Need for Speed Heat ✗ Weak
CPU
77%
GPU
0%
RAM
200%
Civilization 6 ✗ Weak
CPU
180%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order ✗ Weak
CPU
150%
GPU
0%
RAM
200%

Configuration options

Available model options · 2 variants across 2 categories

⚙ Processors (1)
Intel Core i7 4600U
• Igpu (1)
Intel HD Graphics 4400

Similar models

Explore alternatives across different angles.