Model review

Lenovo ThinkPad T495s review

Lenovo ThinkPad T495s — from 2019, 1.31 kg, performance 29.

Lenovo

Technical specifications

Type Business
Release year 2019
Screen 14" · 1920x1080
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U
Max. RAM 32 GB
Weight 1.31 kg

Performance scores

Performance
29
/100
CPU
42
/100
GPU
0
/100
USComp
34
/100

AMD business silicon in a 1.31kg ThinkPad shell

The ThinkPad T495s from 2019 asks $381, above the business-class median of $297 — a premium-priced verdict for the class. The configuration is a Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U with a 32GB memory ceiling. Its measurements: weight at 1.31kg against a 1.6 class median (light, top-25 territory), CPU-derived performance index 28.7 against 41.5 for the class, reliability 27 against 42.5, graphics at the data floor.

The carry is the credential

The T495s exists to put the s-chassis lightness into the AMD price bracket, and 1.31kg delivers it: this is 290 grams under the class median, felt daily. The 3700U's four cores handle the business load without complaint, and the 32GB ceiling keeps multitasking roomy. For a commuter who types and calls all day, the formula is coherent.

What the premium does not cover

Graphics at zero is the integrated-only reading — the Vega silicon is real but unmeasured by our bands, and no game gates are claimed. The performance index 31% below class median reflects the efficiency-tuned AMD cores against newer Intel rivals. And reliability at 27 carries the standard six-year-age flag. The price premium buys the chassis weight class, not compute or pixels.

Price trajectory

From a $1,300 anchor the machine has settled at $381 at 8.45% per year, with a two-year projection of $319. The absolute stake is higher than the cheaper neighbors — and so is the daily dividend of carrying 1.31kg instead of two.

Against the alternatives

Above it: Dell's Vostro 15 3515 at $403 and HP's ProBook 470 G8 at $409. Below: Dell's Latitude 3310 at $361 and HP's EliteBook 835 G7 at $333 — the 835 G7 is the sharp cross-shop: newer AMD business silicon for $48 less, at the cost of this unit's s-line lightness.

Bottom line

Premium-priced for the class, and the honest reason is the 1.31kg business chassis. Buy it if the daily carry is the purchase criterion and the workload is office-tier; skip it if the money should buy compute instead, because the measurements point the other way.

🧭 Your context

Stage: Refining requirements

You're refining — compare finalists head-to-head.

🎯 For your profile

You've viewed: You've recently viewed 5 models — compare this model with them in the analogs matrix.

⭐ What stands out

graphics performance
reliability
27
overall performance
28.7
above median below median class median
  • graphics performance absent (no data or feature not provided).
  • reliability is lower than typical business class (+36.5%) (low tier).
    below class average
  • overall performance is lower than typical business class (+30.8%) (low tier).
    budget segment of category

🔁 Alternatives

Compromise axis: reliability ↔ price

↑ Pricier and more powerful
↓ Cheaper and less powerful

⚙️ Configuration analysis

Top configuration: AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U · 32GB RAM
CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U RAM: 32 GB
office tier

Top configuration is built for office apps, web browsing, and basic daily tasks.

🤔 How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 42.5) ↔ price (median 297.4).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 60) ↔ overall performance (median 41.5).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 62.5) ↔ battery life (median 3.3).

ThinkPad T495s: verdict

+
Best for: light weight
!
Watch out for: gaming and GPU-accelerated tasks
$
Price: $381 — premium-priced for the class

➡️ Next step

You're refining — compare finalists head-to-head.

Technical reference for Lenovo ThinkPad T495s.

Full specifications

Brand
Lenovo
Series
ThinkPad (other)
Type
Business
Release year
2019
Screen size
14"
Resolution
1920x1080
Panel type
ips
Color gamut (sRGB)
100%~
RAM (max)
32 GB DDR4
Weight
1.31 kg
Ports
6
Battery
48 Wh~

Performance scores

Performance
29
/100
CPU
42
/100
GPU
0
/100
USComp
25
/100

Performance metrics

Performance 29
Portability 74
Light office 60
Gaming 12
Creative 12
Energy efficiency 75
Connectivity 95
Value 28
Color accuracy
🎮

No FPS data for this model's GPU.

The GPU may be integrated or not yet benchmarked.

💻 Software compatibility

Counter-Strike 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
85%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Grand Theft Auto V ✗ Weak
CPU
212%
GPU
0%
RAM
800%
Cyberpunk 2077 ✗ Weak
CPU
121%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Minecraft ✗ Weak
CPU
423%
GPU
0%
RAM
800%
Fortnite ✗ Weak
CPU
77%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Valorant ✗ Weak
CPU
282%
GPU
0%
RAM
800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt ✗ Weak
CPU
141%
GPU
0%
RAM
533%
Elden Ring ✗ Weak
CPU
77%
GPU
0%
RAM
267%
Red Dead Redemption 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
141%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Apex Legends ✗ Weak
CPU
77%
GPU
0%
RAM
533%
Hogwarts Legacy ✗ Weak
CPU
94%
GPU
0%
RAM
200%
Dota 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
282%
GPU
0%
RAM
800%
Baldur's Gate 3 ✗ Weak
CPU
77%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Starfield ✗ Weak
CPU
60%
GPU
0%
RAM
200%
Call of Duty: Warzone ✗ Weak
CPU
77%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
League of Legends ✗ Weak
CPU
423%
GPU
0%
RAM
999%
Sims 4 ✗ Weak
CPU
282%
GPU
0%
RAM
800%
Helldivers 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
60%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Battlefield 5 ✗ Weak
CPU
94%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Far Cry 5 ✗ Weak
CPU
106%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Forza Horizon 4 ✗ Weak
CPU
121%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Forza Horizon 5 ✗ Weak
CPU
94%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Metro Exodus ✗ Weak
CPU
106%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Overwatch ✗ Weak
CPU
169%
GPU
0%
RAM
800%
PUBG: Battlegrounds ✗ Weak
CPU
106%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Resident Evil 4 Remake ✗ Weak
CPU
85%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Escape from Tarkov ✗ Weak
CPU
141%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
God of War ✗ Weak
CPU
192%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Horizon Zero Dawn ✗ Weak
CPU
192%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Death Stranding ✗ Weak
CPU
169%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Control ✗ Weak
CPU
141%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Doom Eternal ✗ Weak
CPU
192%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Batman: Arkham Knight ✗ Weak
CPU
235%
GPU
0%
RAM
533%
Hitman 3 ✗ Weak
CPU
192%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Flight Simulator 2020 ✗ Weak
CPU
151%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Watch Dogs Legion ✗ Weak
CPU
151%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Borderlands 3 ✗ Weak
CPU
169%
GPU
0%
RAM
533%
Anno 1800 ✗ Weak
CPU
141%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Rainbow Six Siege ✗ Weak
CPU
353%
GPU
0%
RAM
533%
The Division 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
192%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Gears Tactics ✗ Weak
CPU
169%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Hunt Showdown ✗ Weak
CPU
151%
GPU
0%
RAM
533%
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands ✗ Weak
CPU
141%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Mafia Definitive Edition ✗ Weak
CPU
192%
GPU
0%
RAM
533%
Days Gone ✗ Weak
CPU
192%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Ghostwire Tokyo ✗ Weak
CPU
101%
GPU
0%
RAM
267%
Returnal ✗ Weak
CPU
121%
GPU
0%
RAM
200%
Dying Light 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
141%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Resident Evil Village ✗ Weak
CPU
121%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
The Callisto Protocol ✗ Weak
CPU
85%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Atomic Heart ✗ Weak
CPU
132%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Alan Wake 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
101%
GPU
0%
RAM
200%
Black Myth Wukong ✗ Weak
CPU
85%
GPU
0%
RAM
200%
Ghost of Tsushima ✗ Weak
CPU
85%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
The Last of Us Part 1 ✗ Weak
CPU
85%
GPU
0%
RAM
200%
Diablo 4 ✗ Weak
CPU
192%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Spider-Man Miles Morales ✗ Weak
CPU
141%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Star Wars Jedi Survivor ✗ Weak
CPU
85%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Dead Space Remake ✗ Weak
CPU
132%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Lies of P ✗ Weak
CPU
121%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Sons of the Forest ✗ Weak
CPU
85%
GPU
0%
RAM
267%
Rise of the Tomb Raider ✗ Weak
CPU
282%
GPU
0%
RAM
800%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider ✗ Weak
CPU
235%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey ✗ Weak
CPU
212%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla ✗ Weak
CPU
121%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
F1 24 ✗ Weak
CPU
235%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Need for Speed Heat ✗ Weak
CPU
121%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Civilization 6 ✗ Weak
CPU
282%
GPU
0%
RAM
800%
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order ✗ Weak
CPU
235%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%

Configuration options

Available model options · 2 variants across 2 categories

⚙ Processors (1)
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U
• Igpu (1)
AMD Radeon vega 10 Graphics

Similar models

Explore alternatives across different angles.