Lenovo G560 review
Lenovo G560 — 2.7 kg, performance 0.
Technical specifications
| Type | Laptop |
| Screen | 15.6" · 1366x768 |
| Processor | Intel Pentium P6200 |
| Weight | 2.7 kg |
Performance scores
Zero on the performance index, priced accordingly
The Lenovo G560 asks $120 against a $248 class median, and its configuration — a Pentium P6200 dual-core from the early 2010s — explains the number that defines it: a performance index of zero, below every threshold the catalog tracks, against a class median of 43. Graphics also read at the data floor with no discrete card, and the overall score of 6 against a class middle of 53 completes the floor-portrait.
Reading a zero honestly
A zero here is not a harsh grade — it is a floor marker. The P6200 predates the performance bands this catalog measures against, and no workload the bands describe is reachable on it. Machines like this still boot, still browse lightly, still type; what they cannot do is register on any axis a 2020s buyer shops by.
The roles that remain
The honest purchase reasons at $120: a fixed-function terminal, a parts source for an identical chassis, a machine for a task so small that capability is irrelevant. The reliability question at this age is not an index but a coin flip — the surviving units are the lucky tail of a large production run, and no measurement changes that.
No depreciation anchor exists
No release year is registered for this listing, so there is no launch anchor and no forward price projection. The practical reading: the $120 is terminal value with no curve in either direction. Depreciation as a concept stopped applying to this hardware years ago — the price now reflects scrap-plus-utility, and it will move by pocket change.
Against the alternatives
The same era-price band as always: HP's G62 at $113 and Lenovo's 100-15IBY at $108 below; Dell's Inspiron 15-3552 at $127 and HP's 17-p023ng at $137 above; the IdeaPad Z575 and Inspiron 3542 alongside at $122–123. Identical capability tiers — the listing's condition and the seller's honesty are the only real variables.
Bottom line
A budget-friendly pick for the narrowest of utility roles. The honest verdict: the performance index of zero is the machine's entire biography — it can be bought cheaply for a small job, and it cannot be asked for more than that.
🧭 Your context
Stage: Refining requirements
You're refining — compare finalists head-to-head.
🎯 For your profile
You've viewed: You've recently viewed 14 models — compare this model with them in the analogs matrix.
⭐ What stands out
-
graphics performance absent (no data or feature not provided).
-
overall performance is lower than typical general laptop class (+100%) (low tier).
budget segment of category -
composite score is lower than typical general laptop class (+88.7%).
budget segment of category
🔁 Alternatives
Compromise axis: mobility ↔ overall performance
⚙️ Configuration analysis
Top configuration is built for office apps, web browsing, and basic daily tasks.
🤔 How to choose
Universal advice for any use case.
- Reliability vs price: reliability (median 54) ↔ price (median 247.9).
- Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 50) ↔ overall performance (median 43.1).
- Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.3).
G560: verdict
➡️ Next step
You're refining — compare finalists head-to-head.