Model review

Lenovo IdeaPad 330-17IKB review

Lenovo IdeaPad 330-17IKB — from 2017, 2.8 kg, performance 32.

Lenovo

Technical specifications

Type Laptop
Release year 2017
Screen 17.3" · 1600x900
Processor Intel Core i5 8250U
Graphics Radeon 530
Max. RAM 32 GB
Weight 2.8 kg

Performance scores

Performance
32
/100
CPU
36
/100
GPU
14
/100
USComp
39
/100

IdeaPad 330-17IKB — a 17-inch desk unit with the mobility score to prove it

The IdeaPad 330-17IKB (2017) is a budget 17.3-inch desktop-replacement: a Core i5-8250U with a Radeon 530 entry dGPU and 32GB of RAM at $242 — right at the $248 class median. The measured profile centers on its identity: mobility index 8 against a 50 median (an 84% shortfall, the bottom of the band) and weight 2.8 kg against a 1.8 kg norm. This is the least portable shape in the class, priced at the class midpoint.

What it does well

The i5-8250U quad-core with 32GB of RAM delivers genuine office capability, and the ok-flags give the Radeon 530 a narrow honest claim: minimum settings for Overwatch and Grand Theft Auto V pass, while Far Cry 5 falls well short and fails. The 17.3-inch panel is the workspace argument — side-by-side documents and comfortable media at median money.

The trade-offs, stated plainly

Mobility at 8 versus 50 is the defining number: a 2.8 kg chassis with the battery profile of a desk machine. Reliability at 20 versus 54 marks a seven-year-old consumer build. The Radeon 530 is a technicality of a dGPU — entry-tier when new, era-scoped claims only. Performance is mid-low against newer class rivals.

Price trajectory

From a $900 launch position it has declined at about 8.5% per year to $242, with a projected $202 in two years (16% further). A steady consumer curve, neither steep nor flat.

Against its neighbors

A Dell Inspiron 5570 at $269 sits above; the Lenovo V330-14IKB at $206 and a marketplace-titled listing at $219 below, with an Inspiron 3585 at $243 and a V330 variant at $232 sideways. The Inspiron 3585 at $243 is the same-format rival with AMD silicon — screen-first buyers should cross-check both.

Bottom line

Fairly priced for the desk-first buyer: big panel, real quad-core, 32GB of RAM, narrow era-scoped gaming clearance. The mobility score of 8 is the honest price of the format — buy it for the screen, not for the carrying.

🧭 Your context

Stage: Refining requirements

You're refining — compare finalists head-to-head.

🎯 For your profile

You've viewed: You've recently viewed 29 models — compare this model with them in the analogs matrix.

⭐ What stands out

mobility
8
reliability
20
weight
2.8
above median below median class median
  • mobility is lower than typical general laptop class (+84%) (low tier).
    budget segment of category
  • reliability is lower than typical general laptop class (+63%) (low tier).
    budget segment of category
  • weight is higher than typical general laptop class (+55.6%) (heavy).
    top 25% of its category

🔁 Alternatives

Compromise axis: mobility ↔ overall performance

↑ Pricier and more powerful
↓ Cheaper and less powerful
HP 15 da1xxx · $219
→ Different focus

🎮 What it can run

⚙️ Configuration analysis

Top configuration: Intel Core i5 8250U · Radeon 530 · 32GB RAM
CPU: Intel Core i5 8250U · 8th GPU: Radeon 530 RAM: 32 GB
office tier

Top configuration is built for office apps, web browsing, and basic daily tasks.

🤔 How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 54) ↔ price (median 247.9).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 50) ↔ overall performance (median 43.1).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.3).

IdeaPad 330-17IKB: verdict

+
Best for: a balanced profile
!
Watch out for: mobility and portability
$
Price: $242 — fairly priced for the class

➡️ Next step

You're refining — compare finalists head-to-head.

Technical reference for Lenovo IdeaPad 330-17IKB.

Full specifications

Brand
Lenovo
Series
IdeaPad (other)
Type
Laptop
Release year
2017
Screen size
17.3"
Resolution
1600x900
Panel type
tn
Color gamut (sRGB)
100%~
Graphics
Radeon 530
RAM (max)
32 GB DDR4
Weight
2.80 kg
Ports
6
Battery
50 Wh~

Performance scores

Performance
32
/100
CPU
36
/100
GPU
14
/100
USComp
25
/100

Performance metrics

Performance 32
Portability 6
Light office 60
Gaming 27
Creative 32
Energy efficiency 55
Connectivity 95
Value 49
Color accuracy

🎮 Gaming performance

FPS @ 1080p for the model's best GPU

Game FPS (1080p) Verdict
CS:GO 240 ✓ Комфортно
Overwatch 240 ✓ Комфортно
GTA V 140 ✓ Комфортно
PUBG: Battlegrounds 140 ✓ Комфортно
Valorant 40 ⚠ Играбельно
Dota 2 30 ⚠ Играбельно
Fortnite 30 ⚠ Играбельно
Forza Horizon 4 20 ✗ Низький
Battlefield 5 14 ✗ Низький
The Witcher 3 11 ✗ Низький
Far Cry 5 10 ✗ Низький
Counter-Strike 2 7 ✗ Низький
Forza Horizon 5 6 ✗ Низький
Cyberpunk 2077 5 ✗ Низький
Metro Exodus 4 ✗ Низький
Resident Evil 4 Remake 2 ✗ Низький
💡 16 games in the database for this GPU. ✓ playable (≥60 FPS), ⚠ medium (30-59), ✗ low (<30).

💻 Software compatibility

Counter-Strike 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
72%
GPU
20%
RAM
400%
Grand Theft Auto V ✓ Runs well
CPU
179%
GPU
278%
RAM
800%
Cyberpunk 2077 ✗ Weak
CPU
103%
GPU
46%
RAM
400%
Minecraft ✓ Runs well
CPU
359%
GPU
139%
RAM
800%
Fortnite ✗ Weak
CPU
65%
GPU
87%
RAM
400%
Valorant ✓ Runs well
CPU
239%
GPU
278%
RAM
800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt ✗ Weak
CPU
120%
GPU
56%
RAM
533%
Elden Ring ✗ Weak
CPU
65%
GPU
29%
RAM
267%
Red Dead Redemption 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
120%
GPU
50%
RAM
400%
Apex Legends ✗ Weak
CPU
65%
GPU
35%
RAM
533%
Hogwarts Legacy ✗ Weak
CPU
80%
GPU
46%
RAM
200%
Dota 2 ✓ Runs well
CPU
239%
GPU
278%
RAM
800%
Baldur's Gate 3 ✗ Weak
CPU
65%
GPU
40%
RAM
400%
Starfield ✗ Weak
CPU
51%
GPU
20%
RAM
200%
Call of Duty: Warzone ✗ Weak
CPU
65%
GPU
40%
RAM
400%
League of Legends ✓ Runs well
CPU
359%
GPU
278%
RAM
999%
Sims 4 ✓ Runs well
CPU
239%
GPU
278%
RAM
800%
Helldivers 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
51%
GPU
21%
RAM
400%
Battlefield 5 ✗ Weak
CPU
80%
GPU
46%
RAM
400%
Far Cry 5 ✗ Weak
CPU
90%
GPU
63%
RAM
400%
Forza Horizon 4 ✗ Weak
CPU
103%
GPU
77%
RAM
400%
Forza Horizon 5 ✗ Weak
CPU
80%
GPU
40%
RAM
400%
Metro Exodus ✗ Weak
CPU
90%
GPU
45%
RAM
400%
Overwatch ✓ Runs well
CPU
144%
GPU
278%
RAM
800%
PUBG: Battlegrounds ✗ Weak
CPU
90%
GPU
58%
RAM
400%
Resident Evil 4 Remake ✗ Weak
CPU
72%
GPU
34%
RAM
400%
Escape from Tarkov ✗ Weak
CPU
120%
GPU
56%
RAM
400%
God of War ✗ Weak
CPU
163%
GPU
58%
RAM
400%
Horizon Zero Dawn ✗ Weak
CPU
163%
GPU
46%
RAM
400%
Death Stranding ✗ Weak
CPU
144%
GPU
45%
RAM
400%
Control ✗ Weak
CPU
120%
GPU
46%
RAM
400%
Doom Eternal ✗ Weak
CPU
163%
GPU
69%
RAM
400%
Batman: Arkham Knight ✗ Weak
CPU
199%
GPU
69%
RAM
533%
Hitman 3 ✗ Weak
CPU
163%
GPU
69%
RAM
400%
Flight Simulator 2020 ✗ Weak
CPU
128%
GPU
56%
RAM
400%
Watch Dogs Legion ✗ Weak
CPU
128%
GPU
58%
RAM
400%
Borderlands 3 ✗ Weak
CPU
144%
GPU
50%
RAM
533%
Anno 1800 ✗ Weak
CPU
120%
GPU
69%
RAM
400%
Rainbow Six Siege ✓ Runs well
CPU
299%
GPU
139%
RAM
533%
The Division 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
163%
GPU
56%
RAM
400%
Gears Tactics ✗ Weak
CPU
144%
GPU
93%
RAM
400%
Hunt Showdown ✗ Weak
CPU
128%
GPU
69%
RAM
533%
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands ✗ Weak
CPU
120%
GPU
34%
RAM
400%
Mafia Definitive Edition ✗ Weak
CPU
163%
GPU
69%
RAM
533%
Days Gone ✗ Weak
CPU
163%
GPU
46%
RAM
400%
Ghostwire Tokyo ✗ Weak
CPU
85%
GPU
58%
RAM
267%
Returnal ✗ Weak
CPU
103%
GPU
35%
RAM
200%
Dying Light 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
120%
GPU
34%
RAM
400%
Resident Evil Village ✗ Weak
CPU
103%
GPU
40%
RAM
400%
The Callisto Protocol ✗ Weak
CPU
72%
GPU
35%
RAM
400%
Atomic Heart ✗ Weak
CPU
112%
GPU
58%
RAM
400%
Alan Wake 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
85%
GPU
21%
RAM
200%
Black Myth Wukong ✗ Weak
CPU
72%
GPU
58%
RAM
200%
Ghost of Tsushima ✗ Weak
CPU
72%
GPU
58%
RAM
400%
The Last of Us Part 1 ✗ Weak
CPU
72%
GPU
35%
RAM
200%
Diablo 4 ✗ Weak
CPU
163%
GPU
69%
RAM
400%
Spider-Man Miles Morales ✗ Weak
CPU
120%
GPU
69%
RAM
400%
Star Wars Jedi Survivor ✗ Weak
CPU
72%
GPU
25%
RAM
400%
Dead Space Remake ✗ Weak
CPU
112%
GPU
34%
RAM
400%
Lies of P ✗ Weak
CPU
103%
GPU
58%
RAM
400%
Sons of the Forest ✗ Weak
CPU
72%
GPU
30%
RAM
267%
Rise of the Tomb Raider ✓ Runs well
CPU
239%
GPU
139%
RAM
800%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider ✗ Weak
CPU
199%
GPU
69%
RAM
400%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey ✗ Weak
CPU
179%
GPU
69%
RAM
400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla ✗ Weak
CPU
103%
GPU
58%
RAM
400%
F1 24 ✗ Weak
CPU
199%
GPU
34%
RAM
400%
Need for Speed Heat ✗ Weak
CPU
103%
GPU
40%
RAM
400%
Civilization 6 ✓ Runs well
CPU
239%
GPU
139%
RAM
800%
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order ✓ Runs well
CPU
199%
GPU
116%
RAM
400%

Configuration options

Available model options · 3 variants across 3 categories

⚙ Processors (1)
Intel Core i5 8250U
🎮 Graphics (1)
Radeon 530
• Igpu (1)
Intel UHD Graphics 620

Similar models

Explore alternatives across different angles.