HP 15-ra047ur review
HP 15-ra047ur — 2.1 kg, performance 0.
Technical specifications
| Type | Laptop |
| Screen | 15.6" · 1366x768 |
| Processor | Intel Celeron N3060 |
| Weight | 2.1 kg |
Performance scores
HP 15-ra047ur — Braswell Celeron at the bottom of the band
The HP 15-ra047ur is a mid-2010s budget 15-inch built on Intel's Celeron N3060 — the same Braswell dual-core SoC family as its siblings in this catalog. At $101 it sits near the absolute bottom of the general-laptop price range, 59% below the $248 class median. The measured profile: graphics 0, performance index 0 against a 43 median, USComp score 6.
What the cheapest tier buys
Two efficiency cores at up to 2.48 GHz: adequate in 2016 for one browser window and a video player, below modern tolerance in every dimension. The performance index of 0 is the honest figure — current web applications strain the machine visibly on every interaction. At $101 the buyer is purchasing the minimum entry point into working laptops, and nothing more.
The floor, plainly stated
Performance 0, graphics 0, USComp 6 (−88.7% versus class): no axis offers redemption. The honest use case is terminal duty — a single undemanding application, offline media, or controlled-environment use. Within this price band the differences between floor-tier machines are marginal; this listing competes on being among the cheapest, which it is.
Price framing
No reliable depreciation data is on record for this model (no original MSRP or release year), so no forward projection can be computed. The $101 asking price is terminal value — no resale expectation, no upgrade path, no headroom.
Where it sits against peers
Pricier neighbors are the HP G62 ($113) and Compaq CQ58 ($115); cheaper options are the Lenovo G550 ($95) and ThinkPad SL500 ($88) — older machines at even lower prices. The band's decision at this level is marginal between floor-tier options; none of them offers meaningful capability differentiation.
Bottom line
A floor-tier machine at nearly the lowest price in the catalog: recommended only where absolute price minimum is the criterion and duty is trivially narrow. Any additional budget at all moves the buyer into meaningfully faster platforms in the $120-130 range.
🧭 Your context
Stage: Refining requirements
You're refining — compare finalists head-to-head.
🎯 For your profile
You've viewed: You've recently viewed 39 models — compare this model with them in the analogs matrix.
⭐ What stands out
-
graphics performance absent (no data or feature not provided).
-
overall performance is lower than typical general laptop class (+100%) (low tier).
budget segment of category -
composite score is lower than typical general laptop class (+88.7%).
budget segment of category
🔁 Alternatives
Compromise axis: mobility ↔ overall performance
⚙️ Configuration analysis
Top configuration is built for office apps, web browsing, and basic daily tasks.
🤔 How to choose
Universal advice for any use case.
- Reliability vs price: reliability (median 54) ↔ price (median 247.9).
- Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 50) ↔ overall performance (median 43.1).
- Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.3).
15-ra047ur: verdict
➡️ Next step
You're refining — compare finalists head-to-head.