Model review

HP EliteBook Folio 9470M review

HP EliteBook Folio 9470M — from 2012, 1.63 kg, performance 28.

HP EliteBook Folio 9470M

Technical specifications

Type Business
Release year 2012
Screen 14" · 1366x768
Processor Intel Core i5 3437U , Intel Core i5 3427U , Intel Core i7 3687U , Intel Core i7 3667U , Intel Core i5 3337U
Max. RAM 16 GB
Weight 1.63 kg
Battery 52 Wh

Performance scores

Performance
28
/100
CPU
13
/100
GPU
46
/100
USComp
43
/100

HP EliteBook Folio 9470m — a 2012 ultrabook whose graphics placing flatters it

A 2012 business ultrabook at $132, far below the $297 class median. Core i5-3437U with 16GB of RAM. The sheet shows graphics at 45.85 — 11× the class median, "mainstream" tier; the honest counterweights are CPU at 13.14 (−75%) and reliability at 14 (−67%).

Read past the graphics number

As with all vintage machines carrying this graphics index, the placing flatters the hardware: a 2012 integrated GPU measured against a low-bar business class. The capability bars define the truth — Rainbow Six Siege, Minecraft, and League of Legends clear minimum, nothing more. Esports-minimum is the real graphics story; "mainstream" is the index's generous framing.

The Ivy Bridge ultrabook, honestly

The Folio 9470m was a well-built business ultrabook of the first ultrabook generation, and the 16GB of RAM in this example is a generous ceiling for the platform. The CPU at 13 against a 53 median is the honest compute position — office-tolerant dual-core from thirteen years ago. Reliability at 14 prices the age throughout.

Price trajectory

From a $1,300 base, decay has run 5.95% per year to $132, with a projected $117 (−11%) ahead. The value verdict — worth the asking price — reflects how little the price asks against even narrow capability.

Against its neighbors

Pricier: the ProBook 6570b ($145) and Dell Latitude E6330 ($144) — thicker conventional business machines of the same era. Cheaper: the EliteBook 8470p ($120) and Lenovo ThinkPad T430 ($117) — the T430 being the same-generation classic for $15 less. The T430 is the pragmatic rival; the Folio is the lighter, RAM-topped alternative.

Bottom line

A first-generation ultrabook with one flattering number and an honest one. For light office duty the 16GB helps; for anything else, the T430 next door is the smarter vintage purchase.

🧭 Your context

Stage: Refining requirements

You're refining — compare finalists head-to-head.

🎯 For your profile

You've viewed: You've recently viewed 34 models — compare this model with them in the analogs matrix.

⭐ What stands out

graphics performance
45.9
CPU performance
13.1
reliability
14
above median below median class median
  • graphics performance is higher than typical business class (+200%) (mainstream tier).
    top 25% of its category
  • CPU performance is lower than typical business class (+75.2%) (basic tier).
    budget segment of category
  • reliability is lower than typical business class (+67.1%) (low tier).
    budget segment of category

🔁 Alternatives

Compromise axis: reliability ↔ price

↑ Pricier and more powerful
↓ Cheaper and less powerful

🎮 What it can run

⚙️ Configuration analysis

Top configuration: Intel Core i5 3437U · 16GB RAM
CPU: Intel Core i5 3437U · 3rd RAM: 16 GB
mainstream tier

Top configuration suits everyday productivity, light photo editing, and esports titles.

🤔 How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 42.5) ↔ price (median 297.4).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 60) ↔ overall performance (median 41.5).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 62.5) ↔ battery life (median 3.3).

EliteBook Folio 9470M: verdict

+
Best for: GPU-accelerated workloads and gaming
!
Watch out for: CPU-intensive compute work
$
Price: $132 — worth the asking price

➡️ Next step

You're refining — compare finalists head-to-head.

Technical reference for HP EliteBook Folio 9470M.

Full specifications

Brand
HP
Series
EliteBook Folio (legacy premium)
Type
Business
Release year
2012
Screen size
14"
Resolution
1366x768
Panel type
tn
Color gamut (sRGB)
100%~
RAM (max)
16 GB DDR3
Weight
1.63 kg
Ports
6
Backlit keyboard
Webcam
TPM (security)
Battery
52 Wh

Performance scores

Performance
28
/100
CPU
13
/100
GPU
46
/100
USComp
31
/100

Performance metrics

Performance 28
Portability 64
Light office 23
Gaming 71
Creative 28
Energy efficiency 52
Connectivity 80
Value 51
Color accuracy
🎮

No FPS data for this model's GPU.

The GPU may be integrated or not yet benchmarked.

💻 Software compatibility

Counter-Strike 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
26%
GPU
66%
RAM
200%
Grand Theft Auto V ✗ Weak
CPU
66%
GPU
917%
RAM
400%
Cyberpunk 2077 ✗ Weak
CPU
38%
GPU
153%
RAM
200%
Minecraft ✓ Runs well
CPU
131%
GPU
459%
RAM
400%
Fortnite ✗ Weak
CPU
24%
GPU
287%
RAM
200%
Valorant ✗ Weak
CPU
88%
GPU
917%
RAM
400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt ✗ Weak
CPU
44%
GPU
183%
RAM
267%
Elden Ring ✗ Weak
CPU
24%
GPU
96%
RAM
133%
Red Dead Redemption 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
44%
GPU
164%
RAM
200%
Apex Legends ✗ Weak
CPU
24%
GPU
115%
RAM
267%
Hogwarts Legacy ✗ Weak
CPU
29%
GPU
153%
RAM
100%
Dota 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
88%
GPU
917%
RAM
400%
Baldur's Gate 3 ✗ Weak
CPU
24%
GPU
131%
RAM
200%
Starfield ✗ Weak
CPU
19%
GPU
66%
RAM
100%
Call of Duty: Warzone ✗ Weak
CPU
24%
GPU
131%
RAM
200%
League of Legends ✓ Runs well
CPU
131%
GPU
917%
RAM
800%
Sims 4 ✗ Weak
CPU
88%
GPU
917%
RAM
400%
Helldivers 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
19%
GPU
71%
RAM
200%
Battlefield 5 ✗ Weak
CPU
29%
GPU
153%
RAM
200%
Far Cry 5 ✗ Weak
CPU
33%
GPU
208%
RAM
200%
Forza Horizon 4 ✗ Weak
CPU
38%
GPU
255%
RAM
200%
Forza Horizon 5 ✗ Weak
CPU
29%
GPU
131%
RAM
200%
Metro Exodus ✗ Weak
CPU
33%
GPU
148%
RAM
200%
Overwatch ✗ Weak
CPU
53%
GPU
917%
RAM
400%
PUBG: Battlegrounds ✗ Weak
CPU
33%
GPU
191%
RAM
200%
Resident Evil 4 Remake ✗ Weak
CPU
26%
GPU
112%
RAM
200%
Escape from Tarkov ✗ Weak
CPU
44%
GPU
183%
RAM
200%
God of War ✗ Weak
CPU
60%
GPU
191%
RAM
200%
Horizon Zero Dawn ✗ Weak
CPU
60%
GPU
153%
RAM
200%
Death Stranding ✗ Weak
CPU
53%
GPU
148%
RAM
200%
Control ✗ Weak
CPU
44%
GPU
153%
RAM
200%
Doom Eternal ✗ Weak
CPU
60%
GPU
229%
RAM
200%
Batman: Arkham Knight ✗ Weak
CPU
73%
GPU
229%
RAM
267%
Hitman 3 ✗ Weak
CPU
60%
GPU
229%
RAM
200%
Flight Simulator 2020 ✗ Weak
CPU
47%
GPU
183%
RAM
200%
Watch Dogs Legion ✗ Weak
CPU
47%
GPU
191%
RAM
200%
Borderlands 3 ✗ Weak
CPU
53%
GPU
164%
RAM
267%
Anno 1800 ✗ Weak
CPU
44%
GPU
229%
RAM
200%
Rainbow Six Siege ✓ Runs well
CPU
110%
GPU
459%
RAM
267%
The Division 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
60%
GPU
183%
RAM
200%
Gears Tactics ✗ Weak
CPU
53%
GPU
306%
RAM
200%
Hunt Showdown ✗ Weak
CPU
47%
GPU
229%
RAM
267%
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands ✗ Weak
CPU
44%
GPU
112%
RAM
200%
Mafia Definitive Edition ✗ Weak
CPU
60%
GPU
229%
RAM
267%
Days Gone ✗ Weak
CPU
60%
GPU
153%
RAM
200%
Ghostwire Tokyo ✗ Weak
CPU
31%
GPU
191%
RAM
133%
Returnal ✗ Weak
CPU
38%
GPU
115%
RAM
100%
Dying Light 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
44%
GPU
112%
RAM
200%
Resident Evil Village ✗ Weak
CPU
38%
GPU
131%
RAM
200%
The Callisto Protocol ✗ Weak
CPU
26%
GPU
115%
RAM
200%
Atomic Heart ✗ Weak
CPU
41%
GPU
191%
RAM
200%
Alan Wake 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
31%
GPU
71%
RAM
100%
Black Myth Wukong ✗ Weak
CPU
26%
GPU
191%
RAM
100%
Ghost of Tsushima ✗ Weak
CPU
26%
GPU
191%
RAM
200%
The Last of Us Part 1 ✗ Weak
CPU
26%
GPU
115%
RAM
100%
Diablo 4 ✗ Weak
CPU
60%
GPU
229%
RAM
200%
Spider-Man Miles Morales ✗ Weak
CPU
44%
GPU
229%
RAM
200%
Star Wars Jedi Survivor ✗ Weak
CPU
26%
GPU
83%
RAM
200%
Dead Space Remake ✗ Weak
CPU
41%
GPU
112%
RAM
200%
Lies of P ✗ Weak
CPU
38%
GPU
191%
RAM
200%
Sons of the Forest ✗ Weak
CPU
26%
GPU
100%
RAM
133%
Rise of the Tomb Raider ✗ Weak
CPU
88%
GPU
459%
RAM
400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider ✗ Weak
CPU
73%
GPU
229%
RAM
200%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey ✗ Weak
CPU
66%
GPU
229%
RAM
200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla ✗ Weak
CPU
38%
GPU
191%
RAM
200%
F1 24 ✗ Weak
CPU
73%
GPU
112%
RAM
200%
Need for Speed Heat ✗ Weak
CPU
38%
GPU
131%
RAM
200%
Civilization 6 ✗ Weak
CPU
88%
GPU
459%
RAM
400%
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order ✗ Weak
CPU
73%
GPU
382%
RAM
200%

Configuration options

Available model options · 18 variants across 6 categories

⚙ Processors (5)
Intel Core i5 (3rd Gen) 3437U Intel Core i5 (3rd Gen) 3427U Intel Core i7 (3rd Gen) 3687U Intel Core i7 (3rd Gen) 3667U Intel Core i5 (3rd Gen) 3337U
🖥 Displays (2)
1600 x 900 (HD+) 1366 x 768 (HD)
🎮 Graphics (1)
Intel HD Graphics 4000
• Igpu (1)
Intel HD Graphics 4000
🔲 Memory (3)
4 GB (1 x 4 GB) 8 GB (2 x 4 GB) 16 GB
💾 Storage (6)
128 GB SSD SATA 6Gb/s 180 GB SSD SATA 6Gb/s 256 GB SSD SATA 6Gb/s 320 GB HDD 500 GB HDD SATA 3Gb/s 750 GB HDD

Similar models

Explore alternatives across different angles.