HP 250 G6 review
HP 250 G6 — from 2016, 2 kg, performance 20.
Technical specifications
| Type | Business |
| Release year | 2016 |
| Screen | 15.6" · 1366x768 |
| Processor | Intel Celeron N3060 |
| Max. RAM | 32 GB |
| Weight | 2 kg |
Performance scores
A cheap 2016 HP 250 G6 with a Celeron CPU and no real standout strength
The HP 250 G6 (2016) pairs an Intel Celeron N3060 with 32 GB of RAM and lands at $152, well below the business-class median of about $297. It is an honest budget office machine with no standout strength: reliability is low at 12, the overall performance index is 19.6 (low for the class), and there is no discrete GPU. The 32 GB of RAM is more than the Celeron can fully exploit.
The price is the only real virtue
The Celeron N3060 is a basic-tier dual-core Atom-class processor that handles email, web, and light documents, and 32 GB of RAM is more than most peers at this price offer. There is no metric on which this laptop leads its class — the value is in the low price, not in any capability advantage.
Performance and reliability reflect the budget positioning
The weak spot by level is graphics performance (integrated only — no gaming or GPU-accelerated creative work), but the broader truth is that the Celeron N3060 itself is the ceiling: performance index 19.6 and reliability 12 both sit at the bottom of the bracket. This is a machine for genuinely light duties at a budget price.
Slow depreciation, near the floor
From a base near $1300, the laptop has settled to $152 at roughly 7.2% per year, with a projected value around $131 in two years. The curve has flattened, typical for hardware this far into its life.
Tightly bracketed by budget peers
Slightly pricier options include the HP ProBook 430 G6 ($162) and HP ProBook 455 G2 ($174); cheaper alternatives include the Dell Vostro 3555 ($137) and Dell Latitude E5530 ($144), which offer similar vintage business hardware for somewhat less.
Bottom line
The HP 250 G6 only makes sense for a buyer whose budget is firmly capped around $150 and whose workload is genuinely minimal — basic email, web, and documents. Value-for-money is poor relative to slightly pricier peers; spending even $20 more typically buys a meaningfully stronger processor.
🧭 Your context
Stage: Refining requirements
You're refining — compare finalists head-to-head.
🎯 For your profile
You've viewed: You've recently viewed 4 models — compare this model with them in the analogs matrix.
⭐ What stands out
-
graphics performance absent (no data or feature not provided).
-
reliability is lower than typical business class (+71.8%) (low tier).
budget segment of category -
overall performance is lower than typical business class (+52.7%) (low tier).
budget segment of category
🔁 Alternatives
Compromise axis: reliability ↔ price
⚙️ Configuration analysis
Top configuration is built for office apps, web browsing, and basic daily tasks.
🤔 How to choose
Universal advice for any use case.
- Reliability vs price: reliability (median 42.5) ↔ price (median 297.4).
- Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 60) ↔ overall performance (median 41.5).
- Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 62.5) ↔ battery life (median 3.3).
250 G6: verdict
➡️ Next step
You're refining — compare finalists head-to-head.