Model review

HP ProBook 470 G4 review

HP ProBook 470 G4 — from 2016, 2.65 kg, performance 24.

HP

Technical specifications

Type Business
Release year 2016
Screen 17.3" · 1920x1080
Processor Intel Core i5 7200U
Graphics GeForce 930MX 2GB
Max. RAM 32 GB
Weight 2.65 kg

Performance scores

Performance
24
/100
CPU
21
/100
GPU
10
/100
USComp
27
/100

A 2016 ProBook 470 G4 with an entry-level 930MX and very low mobility

The HP ProBook 470 G4 (2016) pairs a 7th-gen Intel Core i5 7200U with a GeForce 930MX (2 GB) and 32 GB of RAM, landing at $297 — in line with the business-class median. The 930MX is an entry-level dGPU whose score of 9.64 sits above the category median because most business laptops have integrated graphics only. The honest weak spot is mobility (10, very low), reflecting the heavy 17-inch chassis.

An entry-level dGPU in a large 17-inch form factor

The 930MX is a modest dGPU, but it is more capable than integrated graphics alone: capability data confirms minimum-level play for GTA V, Sims 4, and Valorant. For everyday media and undemanding titles this is workable; for modern AAA or GPU-accelerated creative work, it is too weak. The 17-inch screen is the main reason to consider this machine if desk space for a large display matters.

Mobility is the honest ceiling

The weak spot by level is mobility (10 against a median of 60), which reflects a heavy 17-inch chassis that is genuinely impractical to carry. Reliability at 12 is also very low, which reflects a 2016 platform well into its later life. This is a machine to keep at a desk, not to travel with.

Depreciation tracking the class

From a base near $1300, the laptop has depreciated to $297 at roughly 7.2% per year, with a projected value around $256 in two years — a typical curve for a 2016 budget business model with a dGPU.

Pricier and cheaper peers bracket it

Slightly pricier options include the HP ProBook 440 G9 ($317) and Dell Latitude 5320 ($333); cheaper alternatives include the Dell Vostro 5568 ($256) and HP ProBook 650 G3 ($282), which offer similar vintage business hardware for somewhat less.

Bottom line

The ProBook 470 G4 is a fair pick only for a buyer who specifically wants a 17-inch desktop-replacement with an entry-level dGPU at this price, and who does not need mobility or long-term reliability. For almost any other use case, peers at similar prices with smaller chassis and newer platforms are the better spend.

🧭 Your context

Stage: Refining requirements

You're refining — compare finalists head-to-head.

🎯 For your profile

You've viewed: You've recently viewed 38 models — compare this model with them in the analogs matrix.

⭐ What stands out

graphics performance
9.6
mobility
10
reliability
12
above median below median class median
  • graphics performance is higher than typical business class (+151%) (office tier).
    above class average
  • mobility is lower than typical business class (+83.3%) (low tier).
    budget segment of category
  • reliability is lower than typical business class (+71.8%) (low tier).
    budget segment of category

🔁 Alternatives

Compromise axis: reliability ↔ price

↑ Pricier and more powerful
↓ Cheaper and less powerful

🎮 What it can run

⚙️ Configuration analysis

Top configuration: Intel Core i5 7200U · GeForce 930MX 2GB · 32GB RAM
CPU: Intel Core i5 7200U · 7th GPU: GeForce 930MX 2GB RAM: 32 GB
office tier

Top configuration is built for office apps, web browsing, and basic daily tasks.

🤔 How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 42.5) ↔ price (median 297.4).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 60) ↔ overall performance (median 41.5).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 62.5) ↔ battery life (median 3.3).

ProBook 470 G4: verdict

+
Best for: everyday graphics and media
!
Watch out for: mobility and portability
$
Price: $297 — fairly priced for the class

➡️ Next step

You're refining — compare finalists head-to-head.

Technical reference for HP ProBook 470 G4.

Full specifications

Brand
HP
Series
ProBook 4xx (mainstream)
Type
Business
Release year
2016
Screen size
17.3"
Resolution
1920x1080
Panel type
ips
Color gamut (sRGB)
100%~
RAM (max)
32 GB DDR4
Weight
2.65 kg
Ports
8
Battery
48 Wh~

Performance scores

Performance
24
/100
CPU
21
/100
GPU
10
/100
USComp
21
/100

Performance metrics

Performance 24
Portability 6
Light office 54
Gaming 13
Creative 32
Energy efficiency 59
Connectivity 100
Value 18
Color accuracy
🎮

No FPS data for this model's GPU.

The GPU may be integrated or not yet benchmarked.

💻 Software compatibility

Counter-Strike 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
41%
GPU
14%
RAM
400%
Grand Theft Auto V ✓ Runs well
CPU
103%
GPU
193%
RAM
800%
Cyberpunk 2077 ✗ Weak
CPU
59%
GPU
32%
RAM
400%
Minecraft ✗ Weak
CPU
206%
GPU
96%
RAM
800%
Fortnite ✗ Weak
CPU
37%
GPU
60%
RAM
400%
Valorant ✓ Runs well
CPU
137%
GPU
193%
RAM
800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt ✗ Weak
CPU
69%
GPU
39%
RAM
533%
Elden Ring ✗ Weak
CPU
37%
GPU
20%
RAM
267%
Red Dead Redemption 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
69%
GPU
34%
RAM
400%
Apex Legends ✗ Weak
CPU
37%
GPU
24%
RAM
533%
Hogwarts Legacy ✗ Weak
CPU
46%
GPU
32%
RAM
200%
Dota 2 ✓ Runs well
CPU
137%
GPU
193%
RAM
800%
Baldur's Gate 3 ✗ Weak
CPU
37%
GPU
28%
RAM
400%
Starfield ✗ Weak
CPU
29%
GPU
14%
RAM
200%
Call of Duty: Warzone ✗ Weak
CPU
37%
GPU
28%
RAM
400%
League of Legends ✓ Runs well
CPU
206%
GPU
193%
RAM
999%
Sims 4 ✓ Runs well
CPU
137%
GPU
193%
RAM
800%
Helldivers 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
29%
GPU
15%
RAM
400%
Battlefield 5 ✗ Weak
CPU
46%
GPU
32%
RAM
400%
Far Cry 5 ✗ Weak
CPU
52%
GPU
44%
RAM
400%
Forza Horizon 4 ✗ Weak
CPU
59%
GPU
54%
RAM
400%
Forza Horizon 5 ✗ Weak
CPU
46%
GPU
28%
RAM
400%
Metro Exodus ✗ Weak
CPU
52%
GPU
31%
RAM
400%
Overwatch ✗ Weak
CPU
82%
GPU
193%
RAM
800%
PUBG: Battlegrounds ✗ Weak
CPU
52%
GPU
40%
RAM
400%
Resident Evil 4 Remake ✗ Weak
CPU
41%
GPU
24%
RAM
400%
Escape from Tarkov ✗ Weak
CPU
69%
GPU
39%
RAM
400%
God of War ✗ Weak
CPU
94%
GPU
40%
RAM
400%
Horizon Zero Dawn ✗ Weak
CPU
94%
GPU
32%
RAM
400%
Death Stranding ✗ Weak
CPU
82%
GPU
31%
RAM
400%
Control ✗ Weak
CPU
69%
GPU
32%
RAM
400%
Doom Eternal ✗ Weak
CPU
94%
GPU
48%
RAM
400%
Batman: Arkham Knight ✗ Weak
CPU
114%
GPU
48%
RAM
533%
Hitman 3 ✗ Weak
CPU
94%
GPU
48%
RAM
400%
Flight Simulator 2020 ✗ Weak
CPU
74%
GPU
39%
RAM
400%
Watch Dogs Legion ✗ Weak
CPU
74%
GPU
40%
RAM
400%
Borderlands 3 ✗ Weak
CPU
82%
GPU
34%
RAM
533%
Anno 1800 ✗ Weak
CPU
69%
GPU
48%
RAM
400%
Rainbow Six Siege ✗ Weak
CPU
172%
GPU
96%
RAM
533%
The Division 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
94%
GPU
39%
RAM
400%
Gears Tactics ✗ Weak
CPU
82%
GPU
64%
RAM
400%
Hunt Showdown ✗ Weak
CPU
74%
GPU
48%
RAM
533%
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands ✗ Weak
CPU
69%
GPU
24%
RAM
400%
Mafia Definitive Edition ✗ Weak
CPU
94%
GPU
48%
RAM
533%
Days Gone ✗ Weak
CPU
94%
GPU
32%
RAM
400%
Ghostwire Tokyo ✗ Weak
CPU
49%
GPU
40%
RAM
267%
Returnal ✗ Weak
CPU
59%
GPU
24%
RAM
200%
Dying Light 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
69%
GPU
24%
RAM
400%
Resident Evil Village ✗ Weak
CPU
59%
GPU
28%
RAM
400%
The Callisto Protocol ✗ Weak
CPU
41%
GPU
24%
RAM
400%
Atomic Heart ✗ Weak
CPU
64%
GPU
40%
RAM
400%
Alan Wake 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
49%
GPU
15%
RAM
200%
Black Myth Wukong ✗ Weak
CPU
41%
GPU
40%
RAM
200%
Ghost of Tsushima ✗ Weak
CPU
41%
GPU
40%
RAM
400%
The Last of Us Part 1 ✗ Weak
CPU
41%
GPU
24%
RAM
200%
Diablo 4 ✗ Weak
CPU
94%
GPU
48%
RAM
400%
Spider-Man Miles Morales ✗ Weak
CPU
69%
GPU
48%
RAM
400%
Star Wars Jedi Survivor ✗ Weak
CPU
41%
GPU
18%
RAM
400%
Dead Space Remake ✗ Weak
CPU
64%
GPU
24%
RAM
400%
Lies of P ✗ Weak
CPU
59%
GPU
40%
RAM
400%
Sons of the Forest ✗ Weak
CPU
41%
GPU
21%
RAM
267%
Rise of the Tomb Raider ✗ Weak
CPU
137%
GPU
96%
RAM
800%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider ✗ Weak
CPU
114%
GPU
48%
RAM
400%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey ✗ Weak
CPU
103%
GPU
48%
RAM
400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla ✗ Weak
CPU
59%
GPU
40%
RAM
400%
F1 24 ✗ Weak
CPU
114%
GPU
24%
RAM
400%
Need for Speed Heat ✗ Weak
CPU
59%
GPU
28%
RAM
400%
Civilization 6 ✗ Weak
CPU
137%
GPU
96%
RAM
800%
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order ✗ Weak
CPU
114%
GPU
80%
RAM
400%

Configuration options

Available model options · 3 variants across 3 categories

⚙ Processors (1)
Intel Core i5 7200U
🎮 Graphics (1)
GeForce 930MX 2GB
• Igpu (1)
Intel HD Graphics 620

Similar models

Explore alternatives across different angles.