Model review

HP ProBook 430 G5 review

HP ProBook 430 G5 — from 2017, 1.49 kg, performance 15.

HP

Technical specifications

Type Business
Release year 2017
Screen 13.3" · 1366x768
Processor Intel Celeron 3865U
Max. RAM 32 GB
Weight 1.49 kg

Performance scores

Performance
15
/100
CPU
8
/100
GPU
0
/100
USComp
28
/100

An ultra-budget 2017 ProBook with a bottom-tier CPU and more RAM than it can use

The HP ProBook 430 G5 from 2017 lands at $147, well below the business-class median of about $297, and that price tells most of the story. It pairs a Celeron 3867U — one of the weakest mobile chips of its era — with an unusually generous 32 GB of RAM. The result is an awkward split: memory headroom the processor cannot exploit, held back by a CPU that scores just 7.55 against a category median near 53. There is no discrete graphics option, and reliability sits low at 10 versus a median of 42.5.

32 GB of RAM in an otherwise minimal config

The standout figure on paper is the 32 GB of memory, which sits well above what most laptops at this price offer. In practice, that headroom only matters for keeping many light browser and Office tabs open at once — the Celeron CPU is the bottleneck for anything heavier, so the RAM is more of a future-proofing curiosity than a performance unlock.

The Celeron CPU is the real ceiling

Honestly, the 3867U is the weak point. With a CPU score of 7.55 against a category median near 53, this is a machine for email, web, and light document work, not for multitasking under load or any kind of compute task. Reliability is also low for the class, which is worth weighing given the age. Gaming and any GPU-accelerated workflow are off the table — the integrated graphics are office-tier only.

Steady depreciation, floor approaching

From an original base around $1300, the laptop has settled to $147 at roughly 7.6% per year, with a projected value near $126 in two years — a slow bleed that suggests most of the depreciation has already happened.

Positioned against cheaper and slightly pricier peers

Cheaper analogs like the HP 250 G4 ($127) and Dell Vostro 3555 ($137) sit in the same bottom bracket, while slightly pricier options such as the HP 250 G7 ($155) and Lenovo ThinkPad Edge E545 ($157) offer marginally more for not much more money.

Bottom line

The ProBook 430 G5 only makes sense if your budget is firmly capped around $150 and your workload is genuinely light — email, documents, browsing. The 32 GB of RAM is wasted on the Celeron CPU, and value-for-money is poor relative to peers; a slightly cheaper or similarly priced model with a stronger processor would be a better spend for almost any buyer.

🧭 Your context

Stage: Vague sense of need

Browse category overviews to narrow things down.

⚙️ Configuration analysis

Top configuration: Intel Celeron 3865U · 32GB RAM
CPU: Intel Celeron 3865U RAM: 32 GB
office tier

Top configuration is built for office apps, web browsing, and basic daily tasks.

🤔 How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 42.5) ↔ price (median 297.4).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 60) ↔ overall performance (median 41.5).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 62.5) ↔ battery life (median 3.3).

ProBook 430 G5: verdict

+
Best for: a balanced profile
!
Watch out for: gaming and GPU-accelerated tasks
$
Price: $147 — a budget-friendly pick

➡️ Next step

Browse category overviews to narrow things down.

Technical reference for HP ProBook 430 G5.

Full specifications

Brand
HP
Series
ProBook 4xx (mainstream)
Type
Business
Release year
2017
Screen size
13.3"
Resolution
1366x768
Panel type
tn
Color gamut (sRGB)
100%~
RAM (max)
32 GB DDR4
Weight
1.49 kg
Ports
7
Battery
48 Wh~

Performance scores

Performance
15
/100
CPU
8
/100
GPU
0
/100
USComp
21
/100

Performance metrics

Performance 15
Portability 75
Light office 37
Gaming 59
Creative 12
Energy efficiency 40
Connectivity 100
Value 2
Color accuracy
🎮

No FPS data for this model's GPU.

The GPU may be integrated or not yet benchmarked.

💻 Software compatibility

Counter-Strike 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
15%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Grand Theft Auto V ✗ Weak
CPU
38%
GPU
0%
RAM
800%
Cyberpunk 2077 ✗ Weak
CPU
22%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Minecraft ✗ Weak
CPU
76%
GPU
0%
RAM
800%
Fortnite ✗ Weak
CPU
14%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Valorant ✗ Weak
CPU
50%
GPU
0%
RAM
800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt ✗ Weak
CPU
25%
GPU
0%
RAM
533%
Elden Ring ✗ Weak
CPU
14%
GPU
0%
RAM
267%
Red Dead Redemption 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
25%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Apex Legends ✗ Weak
CPU
14%
GPU
0%
RAM
533%
Hogwarts Legacy ✗ Weak
CPU
17%
GPU
0%
RAM
200%
Dota 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
50%
GPU
0%
RAM
800%
Baldur's Gate 3 ✗ Weak
CPU
14%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Starfield ✗ Weak
CPU
11%
GPU
0%
RAM
200%
Call of Duty: Warzone ✗ Weak
CPU
14%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
League of Legends ✗ Weak
CPU
76%
GPU
0%
RAM
999%
Sims 4 ✗ Weak
CPU
50%
GPU
0%
RAM
800%
Helldivers 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
11%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Battlefield 5 ✗ Weak
CPU
17%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Far Cry 5 ✗ Weak
CPU
19%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Forza Horizon 4 ✗ Weak
CPU
22%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Forza Horizon 5 ✗ Weak
CPU
17%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Metro Exodus ✗ Weak
CPU
19%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Overwatch ✗ Weak
CPU
30%
GPU
0%
RAM
800%
PUBG: Battlegrounds ✗ Weak
CPU
19%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Resident Evil 4 Remake ✗ Weak
CPU
15%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Escape from Tarkov ✗ Weak
CPU
25%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
God of War ✗ Weak
CPU
34%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Horizon Zero Dawn ✗ Weak
CPU
34%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Death Stranding ✗ Weak
CPU
30%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Control ✗ Weak
CPU
25%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Doom Eternal ✗ Weak
CPU
34%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Batman: Arkham Knight ✗ Weak
CPU
42%
GPU
0%
RAM
533%
Hitman 3 ✗ Weak
CPU
34%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Flight Simulator 2020 ✗ Weak
CPU
27%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Watch Dogs Legion ✗ Weak
CPU
27%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Borderlands 3 ✗ Weak
CPU
30%
GPU
0%
RAM
533%
Anno 1800 ✗ Weak
CPU
25%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Rainbow Six Siege ✗ Weak
CPU
63%
GPU
0%
RAM
533%
The Division 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
34%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Gears Tactics ✗ Weak
CPU
30%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Hunt Showdown ✗ Weak
CPU
27%
GPU
0%
RAM
533%
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands ✗ Weak
CPU
25%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Mafia Definitive Edition ✗ Weak
CPU
34%
GPU
0%
RAM
533%
Days Gone ✗ Weak
CPU
34%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Ghostwire Tokyo ✗ Weak
CPU
18%
GPU
0%
RAM
267%
Returnal ✗ Weak
CPU
22%
GPU
0%
RAM
200%
Dying Light 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
25%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Resident Evil Village ✗ Weak
CPU
22%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
The Callisto Protocol ✗ Weak
CPU
15%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Atomic Heart ✗ Weak
CPU
24%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Alan Wake 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
18%
GPU
0%
RAM
200%
Black Myth Wukong ✗ Weak
CPU
15%
GPU
0%
RAM
200%
Ghost of Tsushima ✗ Weak
CPU
15%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
The Last of Us Part 1 ✗ Weak
CPU
15%
GPU
0%
RAM
200%
Diablo 4 ✗ Weak
CPU
34%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Spider-Man Miles Morales ✗ Weak
CPU
25%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Star Wars Jedi Survivor ✗ Weak
CPU
15%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Dead Space Remake ✗ Weak
CPU
24%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Lies of P ✗ Weak
CPU
22%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Sons of the Forest ✗ Weak
CPU
15%
GPU
0%
RAM
267%
Rise of the Tomb Raider ✗ Weak
CPU
50%
GPU
0%
RAM
800%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider ✗ Weak
CPU
42%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey ✗ Weak
CPU
38%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla ✗ Weak
CPU
22%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
F1 24 ✗ Weak
CPU
42%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Need for Speed Heat ✗ Weak
CPU
22%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Civilization 6 ✗ Weak
CPU
50%
GPU
0%
RAM
800%
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order ✗ Weak
CPU
42%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%

Configuration options

Available model options · 2 variants across 2 categories

⚙ Processors (1)
Intel Celeron 3865U
• Igpu (1)
Intel HD Graphics 610

Similar models

Explore alternatives across different angles.