HP 250 G5 review
HP 250 G5 — from 2016, 2 kg, performance 22.
Technical specifications
| Type | Business |
| Release year | 2016 |
| Screen | 15.6" · 1366x768 |
| Processor | Intel Celeron N3060 |
| Graphics | Radeon R5 M330 |
| Max. RAM | 32 GB |
| Weight | 2 kg |
Performance scores
A bottom-tier 2016 machine — modern games unplayable, reliability low, priced ultra-budget
The HP 250 G5 is a 2016 business laptop at $127, well below the business median of $297. Its config — a Celeron N3060 and a weak Radeon R5 M330 with 32GB of RAM — places it at the bottom of the category. No axis rises above the median: reliability is "low" at 12, the overall score is 18 (about 63% below median), and the price is ultra-budget. Modern games are unplayable on this hardware.
No strength stands out in the business field
This laptop has no top strength. Reliability at 12 is "low" (about 72% below the category median), the overall score of 18 is far below the median of 49, and the ultra-budget price reflects where it sits. The Celeron N3060 is a low-power dual-core, and the Radeon R5 M330 is a very weak dedicated GPU — both are bottom-tier by modern standards.
Modern games are simply unplayable
The capability data is blunt: Far Cry 5 and Battlefield 5 are completely unplayable at minimum settings. The R5 M330 cannot shoulder modern gaming or GPU-accelerated work. The realistic role is basic web and office tasks, and even there the Celeron CPU will feel slow.
Steady residual decline
From near $1,300 originally, the 250 G5 has fallen to $127 at about 7.2% per year, with a projected two-year value near $110 — about a 14% further drop. Most of the value loss is already behind it.
Where it sits among peers
It is among the cheapest in its peer set: a Dell Latitude 7480 ($135) or Lenovo ThinkPad T470s ($137) cost a little more. Within the business category it is firmly ultra-budget, but those slightly pricier peers are dramatically more capable machines.
Bottom line
At $127 this is a budget-friendly pick only for the most basic web and office use. The compromises are severe: unplayable modern games, a bottom-tier Celeron CPU, and "low" reliability. For a little more, peers like the Latitude 7480 or ThinkPad T470s offer far more capability — worth considering before settling here.
🧭 Your context
Stage: Refining requirements
You're refining — compare finalists head-to-head.
⭐ What stands out
-
reliability is lower than typical business class (+71.8%) (low tier).
budget segment of category -
composite score is lower than typical business class (+63.3%).
budget segment of category -
price is lower than typical business class (+57.2%) (ultra-budget).
budget segment of category
🔁 Alternatives
Compromise axis: reliability ↔ price
🎮 What it can run
⚙️ Configuration analysis
Top configuration is built for office apps, web browsing, and basic daily tasks.
🤔 How to choose
Universal advice for any use case.
- Reliability vs price: reliability (median 42.5) ↔ price (median 297.4).
- Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 60) ↔ overall performance (median 41.5).
- Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 62.5) ↔ battery life (median 3.3).
250 G5: verdict
➡️ Next step
You're refining — compare finalists head-to-head.