HP Omen 16 (2025) review
HP Omen 16 (2025) — from 2025, 2.43 kg, performance 77.
Technical specifications
| Type | Gaming |
| Release year | 2025 |
| Screen | 16" · 1920x1200 |
| Processor | Intel Core 5 210H , Intel Core 7 240H , Intel Core Ultra 5 225H , Intel Core Ultra 7 255H , Intel Core Ultra 9 285H , Intel Core i7 14650HX , Intel Core i9 14900HX , AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 , AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 , AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 , AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS , AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX , AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX , AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX , AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D |
| Graphics | GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop 8GB , GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop 8GB , GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop 12GB , GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop 12GB |
| Max. RAM | 32 GB |
| Weight | 2.43 kg |
| Battery | 70 Wh |
Performance scores
HP Omen 16 (2025): the ladder's modern top
The HP Omen 16 (2025) closes the four-rung ladder: a Core 5 210H with a GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop 8GB and 32GB of memory at $1,440, the batch's ceiling price. Gaming at 89 is the joint-best reading outside the Omen Max's 100, reliability at 94 is the second-highest figure in this batch's gaming field, and the mobility index of 48 runs 66 percent above the class median.
Where it holds up
Gaming at 89, joint-best outside the Max, arrives on the 5050's 8GB framebuffer — the generous-memory GPU the ladder waited for. Modeling and CAD at 95 are top-tier; office at 91.78 is top-tier; performance at 77.41 is high-band; photo at 80 is high-band; and the mobility figure of 48 is the 16-inch ladder's best, behind only the Victus 15 (2025)'s 50 and the Omen Max's 49 among this batch's gaming machines.
Where it falls short
Memory is the named weakness: 32GB against a class median of 64, the ladder constant since 2023. Portability at 23.8 is low-band. Photo at 80 is the ladder's lowest photo reading — the 2023 rung posted 99 — and value at 66.4 high-band prices the ceiling tier without the Max's chart positions: performance at 77.41 against the Max's 94.03 for the same money.
Price and depreciation
At $1,440 with an empty dollar ledger, the 20 percent annual class-level rate ties for the steepest family of this batch, and first-year exposure sits with the buyer at the ceiling tier. The value reading of 66.4 high-band is fair; the same price buys the Max's 100-gaming sheet — that comparison is the rung's burden.
Alternatives to consider
The HP Omen Max 16 (2025) at the same $1,440: gaming at 100, performance at 94.03, value at 72.4 — the ceiling-price answer. The HP Omen 16 (2023) at $922 posts the double-99 sheet with value at 82.35 for $518 less. The HP Omen 17 (2025) at the same $1,440 carries the same 89 gaming band in the desk-only body with an identical value tier nearby at 62.4.
Bottom line
Fairly priced for the class. The Omen 16 (2025) delivers the joint-best gaming band outside the Max at 89, top-tier modeling and office, the field's second-best reliability at 94, and the ladder's best mobility — against the 32GB constant, low-band portability, and a value reading the Max outclasses at the same price. The modern top of the ladder, priced into the Max's shadow.
🧭 Your context
Stage: Refining requirements
You're refining — compare finalists head-to-head.
🎯 For your profile
You've viewed: You've recently viewed 10 models — compare this model with them in the analogs matrix.
⭐ What stands out
-
reliability is higher than typical gaming class (+77.4%) (high tier).
top 25% of its category -
mobility is higher than typical gaming class (+65.5%) (mid).
top 25% of its category -
memory capacity is lower than typical gaming class (+50%) (professional).
below class average
🎮 What it can run
⚙️ Configuration analysis
Top configuration handles modern AAA games at high settings, video editing, and heavy multitasking.
🤔 How to choose
Universal advice for any use case.
- Reliability vs price: reliability (median 53) ↔ price (median 749.6).
- Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 29) ↔ overall performance (median 73.9).
- Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 100) ↔ battery life (median 2.5).
Omen 16 (2025): verdict
➡️ Next step
You're refining — compare finalists head-to-head.