Dell Pro Max 16 review
Dell Pro Max 16 — from 2025, 2.2 kg, performance 94.
Technical specifications
| Type | Laptop |
| Release year | 2025 |
| Screen | 16" · 1920x1200 |
| Processor | Intel Core Ultra 5 235H , Intel Core Ultra 7 255H , Intel Core Ultra 7 265H , Intel Core Ultra 9 285H |
| Graphics | Intel Arc 140T |
| Max. RAM | 64 GB |
| Weight | 2.2 kg |
| Battery | 64 Wh |
Performance scores
Dell Pro Max 16 (2025): top-band CPU power with unreadable graphics columns
The Dell Pro Max 16 is the most confounding sheet in this batch: $765 buys a Core Ultra 5 235H with Arc 140T graphics and 64GB of memory, producing an overall performance index of 94.41 — the top band, tied with its Pro Max 14 Premium sibling — and a best CPU score of 94.51 in enthusiast territory. Yet the gaming and photo design columns both read 0, not because the machine fails them but because the benchmarks have no matched scoring entries for this configuration.
Where it holds up
The processor-led axes are excellent: office at 91.91 is top-tier, overall performance at 94.41 sits in the top band, and the 64GB memory ceiling doubles the class median. Engineering CAD at 46 reaches the mid band on CPU strength alone. Weight of 2.2kg is the named weakness but reads as merely standard-tier for a 16-inch chassis; this is a genuinely powerful general workstation for office, development, and compile-heavy work at $765.
Where it falls short
The two zero entries — gaming at 0 and photo design at 0 — are coverage gaps rather than measured verdicts, and the honest treatment is to treat both as unknown rather than absent. What is measured is not flattering: 3D modeling at 22 is low-band, and portability at 30.7 sits low as well. Value at 48.9 is mid-tier — fair, but shy of the 65.95 its 14-inch Arc-sibling posts, because this larger chassis pays a portability price the sheet does not offset.
Price and depreciation
No baseline price exists in the ledger, so the projection runs rate-only at a modeled 15 percent per year. On $765 that is roughly $115 of expected first-year loss. The brisk schedule is softened by the low entry point, and the top-band CPU plus 64GB should keep the machine capable long after its resale has flattened.
Alternatives to consider
The Pro Max 16 Premium at the same $765 is the decisive alternative: a real RTX Pro 1000 chip with a measured 53.53 graphics score, CAD at 71 high-tier, photo at 88 top-tier, and the batch's second-best value reading at 87.4 — strictly more machine for the same money. The Pro Max 14 Premium at $765 matches the 94.41 performance with portability of 65 instead of 30.7. If the 16-inch canvas and CPU grunt matter most, this machine still earns its place; otherwise its Premium sibling ends the conversation.
Bottom line
Fairly priced for the class. The Pro Max 16 is a top-band CPU machine with 64GB and top-tier office work whose gaming and photo columns await data rather than judgment — verify the Arc 140T hands-on. Within its own family, though, the identically-priced Premium sibling outclasses it on every measured axis.
🧭 Your context
Stage: Refining requirements
You're refining — compare finalists head-to-head.
🎯 For your profile
You've viewed: You've recently viewed 16 models — compare this model with them in the analogs matrix.
⭐ What stands out
-
overall performance is higher than typical general laptop class (+119.3%) (top tier).
top 25% of its category -
memory capacity is higher than typical general laptop class (+100%) (professional).
top 25% of its category -
CPU performance is higher than typical general laptop class (+60.2%) (enthusiast tier).
top 25% of its category
⚙️ Configuration analysis
Top configuration easily handles AAA games at ultra settings, 4K video editing, and engineering applications.
🤔 How to choose
Universal advice for any use case.
- Reliability vs price: reliability (median 54) ↔ price (median 247.9).
- Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 50) ↔ overall performance (median 43.1).
- Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.3).
Pro Max 16: verdict
➡️ Next step
You're refining — compare finalists head-to-head.