Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 (16″ Gen 9) review
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 (16″ Gen 9) — from 2024, 1.89 kg, performance 48.
Technical specifications
| Type | Laptop |
| Release year | 2024 |
| Screen | 16" · 1920x1200 |
| Processor | Intel Core 5 120U , Intel Core 7 150U , Intel Core Ultra 5 125H , Intel Core Ultra 7 155H , AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS , AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS |
| Max. RAM | 32 GB |
| Weight | 1.89 kg |
| Battery | 47 Wh |
Performance scores
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16 Gen 9: top-band office comfort in a big chassis
The Gen 9 16-incher from the Slim 5 line takes $650 and returns an office index of 88.99 — top band — plus reliability of 91 against a general-class median of 54, a 68.5 percent edge. Its Core 5 120U and 32GB of RAM post a CPU score of 86.32 in the enthusiast band. The graphics line reads 3.84, well below the class median of 27.24, marking this clearly as a comfort-first big-screen productivity machine rather than anything visual.
Where it holds up
Office comfort is the product: 88.99 in the top band, with 32GB of RAM making the machine effectively immune to ordinary memory pressure. Reliability of 91 places it in the class's top quarter — this is build quality that outlasts the payment plan. The 120U's CPU score of 86.32 reads enthusiast-band, and value at 66.75 lands high: for buyers whose work is documents, calls and tabs on a large panel, the capability-per-dollar math works.
Where it falls short
Graphics at 3.84 is the flagged weakness — 85.9 percent below the class median — and the resolved axes agree: gaming sits at 23, modeling at 30, CAD at 33 and photo design at 17, all in the low band. Portability of 40 is mid-band, the price of the 16-inch format, and the performance index of 47.84 lands mid-pack. Nothing here will render, edit seriously or game respectably, and the data says so four times over.
Price and depreciation
$650 is the standard going rate for this batch's general class. No listing history anchors this listing, so the class rate of about 13.89 percent a year is the working assumption — average drain for a machine whose strongest axes (office comfort, reliability) age slowly.
Alternatives to consider
The 14-inch Gen 9 (model 1802) posts the same 88.99 office score and 91 reliability at the same price with far better portability (69.5 against 40) — the better carry for identical comfort. The Gen 10 16-inch (model 1804) swaps in the eight-core 13420H and lifts gaming to 64 at the same $650 for buyers who occasionally play.
Bottom line
Fairly priced for the class. As a large-panel office tool with enthusiast-band CPU comfort and top-tier reliability, it earns its slot; as anything visual, the four low-band axes rule it out without appeal.
🧭 Your context
Stage: Refining requirements
You're refining — compare finalists head-to-head.
🎯 For your profile
You've viewed: You've recently viewed 16 models — compare this model with them in the analogs matrix.
⭐ What stands out
-
graphics performance is lower than typical general laptop class (+85.9%) (office tier).
below class average -
reliability is higher than typical general laptop class (+68.5%) (high tier).
top 25% of its category -
CPU performance is higher than typical general laptop class (+46.3%) (enthusiast tier).
top 25% of its category
⚙️ Configuration analysis
Top configuration easily handles AAA games at ultra settings, 4K video editing, and engineering applications.
🤔 How to choose
Universal advice for any use case.
- Reliability vs price: reliability (median 54) ↔ price (median 247.9).
- Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 50) ↔ overall performance (median 43.1).
- Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.3).
IdeaPad Slim 5 (16″ Gen 9): verdict
➡️ Next step
You're refining — compare finalists head-to-head.