Model review

LG Gram SuperSlim 15.6" (2023) review

LG Gram SuperSlim 15.6" (2023) — from 2023, 0.99 kg, performance 34.

LG

Technical specifications

Type Ultrabook
Release year 2023
Screen 15.6" · 1920x1080
Processor Intel Core i7 1360P
Max. RAM 32 GB
Weight 0.99 kg
Battery 60 Wh

Performance scores

Performance
34
/100
CPU
53
/100
GPU
4
/100
USComp
35
/100

LG Gram SuperSlim 15.6″ (2023) — the one-kilo fifteen-six

The Gram SuperSlim 15.6 at $954 pairs an Intel Core i7 1360P with 32 GB of RAM. The weight is the flagged strength: 0.99 kg, 32% below the class median, the ultralight band — tied for the lightest machine in this batch, and the only one to pair that weight with a 15.6-inch canvas. The flagged weakness is the composite score at 35, 29% below the class median.

Where it holds up

Office productivity at 84.85 (high) leads the sheet, with portability at 70 (high) the practical translation of the sub-kilo body into carry comfort. Photo design reads mid at 37 and the 32 GB tier matches the class median. The format is the product: full-size screen work at a weight the 14-inch class usually claims.

Where it falls short

The composite at 35 is the flag, and the low bands follow: overall performance 34.41, gaming 23, 3D modeling 27 and engineering CAD 30 — all low band. Value at 17.2 (low) prices the engineering achievement rather than the capability: $954 for a single-high sheet.

Price and depreciation

No depreciation anchor is recorded (base $0); no curve or projection applies. The 2023 cohort rate is 10.62% per year — a moderate, half-settled slope.

Alternatives to consider

The Gram Style 14 at the same $954 matches the 0.99 kg weight on the smaller canvas. The Gram Pro 17 at $1,084 adds the RTX 3050 with a 63.1 graphics score for $130 more. The Gram Book 15.6 at $1,232 is the newer-name route with office at 76.09 — a cautionary comparison at the higher price.

Bottom line

Fairly priced for the class. The one-kilo fifteen-six: office 84.85 with portability 70 and a 0.99 kg body — composite 35 and value 17.2 the honest cost of the weight-first engineering.

🧭 Your context

Stage: Refining requirements

You're refining — compare finalists head-to-head.

🎯 For your profile

You've viewed: You've recently viewed 21 models — compare this model with them in the analogs matrix.

⭐ What stands out

weight
1
composite score
35
overall performance
34.4
above median below median class median
  • weight is lower than typical ultrabook class (+32.2%) (ultralight).
    budget segment of category
  • composite score is lower than typical ultrabook class (+28.6%).
    budget segment of category
  • overall performance is lower than typical ultrabook class (+17.5%) (low tier).
    below class average

⚙️ Configuration analysis

Top configuration: Intel Core i7 1360P · 32GB RAM
CPU: Intel Core i7 1360P · 13th RAM: 32 GB
mainstream tier

Top configuration suits everyday productivity, light photo editing, and esports titles.

🤔 How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 51) ↔ price (median 373.2).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 64) ↔ overall performance (median 41.7).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 4.4).

Gram SuperSlim 15.6" (2023): verdict

+
Best for: light weight
!
Watch out for: overall capability

➡️ Next step

You're refining — compare finalists head-to-head.

Technical reference for LG Gram SuperSlim 15.6" (2023).

Full specifications

Brand
LG
Series
Gram
Type
Ultrabook
Release year
2023
Screen size
15.6"
Resolution
1920x1080
Panel type
oled
Color gamut (sRGB)
100%
RAM (max)
32 GB LPDDR5
Weight
0.99 kg
Ports
4
Thunderbolt
Battery
60 Wh

Performance scores

Performance
34
/100
CPU
53
/100
GPU
4
/100
USComp
35
/100

Performance metrics

Performance 34
Portability 70
Light office 85
Gaming 23
Creative 16
Energy efficiency 81
Connectivity 80
Value 17
Color accuracy 85
🎮

No FPS data for this model's GPU.

The GPU may be integrated or not yet benchmarked.

💻 Software compatibility

Counter-Strike 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
105%
GPU
6%
RAM
400%
Grand Theft Auto V ✗ Weak
CPU
264%
GPU
77%
RAM
800%
Cyberpunk 2077 ✗ Weak
CPU
151%
GPU
13%
RAM
400%
Minecraft ✗ Weak
CPU
527%
GPU
38%
RAM
800%
Fortnite ✗ Weak
CPU
96%
GPU
24%
RAM
400%
Valorant ✗ Weak
CPU
352%
GPU
77%
RAM
800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt ✗ Weak
CPU
176%
GPU
15%
RAM
533%
Elden Ring ✗ Weak
CPU
96%
GPU
8%
RAM
267%
Red Dead Redemption 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
176%
GPU
14%
RAM
400%
Apex Legends ✗ Weak
CPU
96%
GPU
10%
RAM
533%
Hogwarts Legacy ✗ Weak
CPU
117%
GPU
13%
RAM
200%
Dota 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
352%
GPU
77%
RAM
800%
Baldur's Gate 3 ✗ Weak
CPU
96%
GPU
11%
RAM
400%
Starfield ✗ Weak
CPU
75%
GPU
6%
RAM
200%
Call of Duty: Warzone ✗ Weak
CPU
96%
GPU
11%
RAM
400%
League of Legends ✗ Weak
CPU
527%
GPU
77%
RAM
999%
Sims 4 ✗ Weak
CPU
352%
GPU
77%
RAM
800%
Helldivers 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
75%
GPU
6%
RAM
400%
Battlefield 5 ✗ Weak
CPU
117%
GPU
13%
RAM
400%
Far Cry 5 ✗ Weak
CPU
132%
GPU
17%
RAM
400%
Forza Horizon 4 ✗ Weak
CPU
151%
GPU
21%
RAM
400%
Forza Horizon 5 ✗ Weak
CPU
117%
GPU
11%
RAM
400%
Metro Exodus ✗ Weak
CPU
132%
GPU
12%
RAM
400%
Overwatch ✗ Weak
CPU
211%
GPU
77%
RAM
800%
PUBG: Battlegrounds ✗ Weak
CPU
132%
GPU
16%
RAM
400%
Resident Evil 4 Remake ✗ Weak
CPU
105%
GPU
9%
RAM
400%
Escape from Tarkov ✗ Weak
CPU
176%
GPU
15%
RAM
400%
God of War ✗ Weak
CPU
240%
GPU
16%
RAM
400%
Horizon Zero Dawn ✗ Weak
CPU
240%
GPU
13%
RAM
400%
Death Stranding ✗ Weak
CPU
211%
GPU
12%
RAM
400%
Control ✗ Weak
CPU
176%
GPU
13%
RAM
400%
Doom Eternal ✗ Weak
CPU
240%
GPU
19%
RAM
400%
Batman: Arkham Knight ✗ Weak
CPU
293%
GPU
19%
RAM
533%
Hitman 3 ✗ Weak
CPU
240%
GPU
19%
RAM
400%
Flight Simulator 2020 ✗ Weak
CPU
188%
GPU
15%
RAM
400%
Watch Dogs Legion ✗ Weak
CPU
188%
GPU
16%
RAM
400%
Borderlands 3 ✗ Weak
CPU
211%
GPU
14%
RAM
533%
Anno 1800 ✗ Weak
CPU
176%
GPU
19%
RAM
400%
Rainbow Six Siege ✗ Weak
CPU
439%
GPU
38%
RAM
533%
The Division 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
240%
GPU
15%
RAM
400%
Gears Tactics ✗ Weak
CPU
211%
GPU
26%
RAM
400%
Hunt Showdown ✗ Weak
CPU
188%
GPU
19%
RAM
533%
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands ✗ Weak
CPU
176%
GPU
9%
RAM
400%
Mafia Definitive Edition ✗ Weak
CPU
240%
GPU
19%
RAM
533%
Days Gone ✗ Weak
CPU
240%
GPU
13%
RAM
400%
Ghostwire Tokyo ✗ Weak
CPU
126%
GPU
16%
RAM
267%
Returnal ✗ Weak
CPU
151%
GPU
10%
RAM
200%
Dying Light 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
176%
GPU
9%
RAM
400%
Resident Evil Village ✗ Weak
CPU
151%
GPU
11%
RAM
400%
The Callisto Protocol ✗ Weak
CPU
105%
GPU
10%
RAM
400%
Atomic Heart ✗ Weak
CPU
165%
GPU
16%
RAM
400%
Alan Wake 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
126%
GPU
6%
RAM
200%
Black Myth Wukong ✗ Weak
CPU
105%
GPU
16%
RAM
200%
Ghost of Tsushima ✗ Weak
CPU
105%
GPU
16%
RAM
400%
The Last of Us Part 1 ✗ Weak
CPU
105%
GPU
10%
RAM
200%
Diablo 4 ✗ Weak
CPU
240%
GPU
19%
RAM
400%
Spider-Man Miles Morales ✗ Weak
CPU
176%
GPU
19%
RAM
400%
Star Wars Jedi Survivor ✗ Weak
CPU
105%
GPU
7%
RAM
400%
Dead Space Remake ✗ Weak
CPU
165%
GPU
9%
RAM
400%
Lies of P ✗ Weak
CPU
151%
GPU
16%
RAM
400%
Sons of the Forest ✗ Weak
CPU
105%
GPU
8%
RAM
267%
Rise of the Tomb Raider ✗ Weak
CPU
352%
GPU
38%
RAM
800%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider ✗ Weak
CPU
293%
GPU
19%
RAM
400%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey ✗ Weak
CPU
264%
GPU
19%
RAM
400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla ✗ Weak
CPU
151%
GPU
16%
RAM
400%
F1 24 ✗ Weak
CPU
293%
GPU
9%
RAM
400%
Need for Speed Heat ✗ Weak
CPU
151%
GPU
11%
RAM
400%
Civilization 6 ✗ Weak
CPU
352%
GPU
38%
RAM
800%
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order ✗ Weak
CPU
293%
GPU
32%
RAM
400%

Configuration options

Available model options · 10 variants across 5 categories

🔋 Batteries (1)
60 Wh
⚙ Processors (1)
Intel Core i7 1360P
🎮 Graphics (1)
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU)
🔲 Memory (3)
8GB 16GB 32GB
💾 Storage (4)
256GB 512GB 1024GB 2048GB

Similar models

Explore alternatives across different angles.