LG Gram Pro 16 review
LG Gram Pro 16 — from 2024, 1.23 kg, performance 74.
Technical specifications
| Type | Ultrabook |
| Release year | 2024 |
| Screen | 16" · 2560x1600 |
| Processor | Intel Core Ultra 5 125H , Intel Core Ultra 7 155H , Intel Core Ultra 7 256V , Intel Core Ultra 7 258V , Intel Core Ultra 9 288V , Intel Core Ultra 7 255H |
| Graphics | GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile 4GB |
| Max. RAM | 32 GB |
| Weight | 1.23 kg |
| Battery | 77 Wh |
Performance scores
LG Gram Pro 16 (2024) — the complete Gram: a 3050, near-perfect trust, no low bands
The Gram Pro 16 at $1,084 is the fullest card in the modern Gram lineup: an Intel Core Ultra 5 125H with a GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile (4 GB) and 32 GB of RAM. The graphics score lands at 63.1 — 16.4 times the ultrabook-class median of 3.84 — reliability posts 96 (up 88% on class, top quartile) and overall performance 73.56 (76% above class). No weakness is flagged, and for once the sheet backs the flag completely.
Where it holds up
Photo design at 89 — top band — leads the sheet by the narrowest of margins over office productivity at 88.99, also top. Gaming reads 71 (high) and engineering CAD 75 (high), with 3D modeling at 58 (mid) — the broadest GPU-fed card of any Gram. The measured fits run wide: Overwatch, GTA V and Rainbow Six Siege clear recommended bars, Photoshop and AutoCAD their minimums, VS Code its recommended tier. There is no low-band axis anywhere on the sheet — the rare profile with no measured weakness at all.
Where it falls short
With no low band and no flag, the only honest critique is price shape: value reads 72.15 (high) — genuinely good, but it took a $1,084 hybrid build to get there. Portability at 59.8 (mid) records the cost of carrying a card.
Price and depreciation
No depreciation anchor is recorded (base $0); no curve or projection applies. The cohort rate is 11.29% per year — a moderate slope for a hybrid premium machine.
Alternatives to consider
The Gram Pro 17 at the same $1,084 carries the identical graphics and office figures on the bigger canvas. The Gram Pro 16 (2-in-1) at $1,084 trades the card for the convertible format with a 77 Wh battery. The Yoga Pro 7i 14″ (Gen 9) at $1,084 is the Lenovo counter-offer with an even stronger 75.91 graphics score in the smaller body.
Bottom line
Fairly priced for the class. The complete Gram: photo 89, office 88.99, reliability 96 and a 16.4×-median graphics score with no low-band axis anywhere — value 72.15 high confirms the hybrid formula finally pays.
🧭 Your context
Stage: Refining requirements
You're refining — compare finalists head-to-head.
🎯 For your profile
You've viewed: You've recently viewed 50 models — compare this model with them in the analogs matrix.
⭐ What stands out
-
graphics performance is higher than typical ultrabook class (+200%) (high tier).
top 25% of its category -
reliability is higher than typical ultrabook class (+88.2%) (high tier).
top 25% of its category -
overall performance is higher than typical ultrabook class (+76.3%) (high tier).
top 25% of its category
🎮 What it can run
⚙️ Configuration analysis
Top configuration handles modern AAA games at high settings, video editing, and heavy multitasking.
🤔 How to choose
Universal advice for any use case.
- Reliability vs price: reliability (median 51) ↔ price (median 373.2).
- Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 64) ↔ overall performance (median 41.7).
- Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 4.4).
Gram Pro 16: verdict
➡️ Next step
You're refining — compare finalists head-to-head.