MSI Crosshair 16 HX (2024) review
MSI Crosshair 16 HX (2024) — from 2024, 2.5 kg, performance 89.
Technical specifications
| Type | Gaming |
| Release year | 2024 |
| Screen | 16" · 2560x1600 |
| Processor | Intel Core i7 14700HX |
| Graphics | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile 8GB , GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile 8GB |
| Max. RAM | 96 GB |
| Weight | 2.5 kg |
| Battery | 90 Wh |
Performance scores
MSI Crosshair 16 HX (2024) — the reliable mid-rung of the 2024 tier
The Crosshair 16 HX (2024) at $1,152 pairs a Core i7-14700HX with a GeForce RTX 4060 (8 GB) and 96 GB of RAM. The flagged strengths are reliability at 84 (+58.5% above the class median), the memory ceiling 50% above median, and CPU performance at 89.81; the verdict records no serious weak spots for the class.
Where it holds up
The mid-tier GPU does not hold back the composites: modeling 99, engineering CAD 99 and photo design 99 all post top band, office reads 98.27, and performance lands at 89.33 (top). The RTX 4060 clears the recommended bar for Overwatch, Grand Theft Auto V and Rainbow Six Siege, Premiere clears its minimum, and the 96 GB ceiling doubles the median. Value posts 73.7 (high).
Where it falls short
The clean verdict carries one footnote: portability nonetheless reads 21.7, the low-band tax of a 16-inch HX-class chassis. Gaming sits at 82 (high) rather than top — the honest ceiling of an RTX 4060 against this tier's larger cards.
Price and depreciation
No depreciation anchor is recorded (base $0); no curve or projection applies. The 2024 cohort rate is 18% per year for this tier — two years of it are already in the $1,152 price.
Alternatives to consider
The Raider GE68 HX at the same $1,152 trades up to a 14900HX CPU (93.95) at the same GPU; the Raider GE68 (2023) at $922 is the same RTX 4060 platform a generation back for 20% less money.
Bottom line
Fairly priced for the class. The dependability pick of the $1,152 rung: reliability-led, 96 GB deep, with a top-band creative sweep around a mid-tier GPU — with the photo, modeling and CAD trio all reading 99, the mid-rung's strongest creative argument. Dependability is the pick's spine.
🧭 Your context
Stage: Refining requirements
You're refining — compare finalists head-to-head.
🎯 For your profile
You've viewed: You've recently viewed 3 models — compare this model with them in the analogs matrix.
⭐ What stands out
-
reliability is higher than typical gaming class (+58.5%) (high tier).
top 25% of its category -
memory capacity is higher than typical gaming class (+50%) (professional).
top 25% of its category -
CPU performance is higher than typical gaming class (+38.1%) (enthusiast tier).
top 25% of its category
🎮 What it can run
⚙️ Configuration analysis
Top configuration easily handles AAA games at ultra settings, 4K video editing, and engineering applications.
🤔 How to choose
Universal advice for any use case.
- Reliability vs price: reliability (median 53) ↔ price (median 749.6).
- Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 29) ↔ overall performance (median 73.9).
- Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 100) ↔ battery life (median 2.5).
Crosshair 16 HX (2024): verdict
➡️ Next step
You're refining — compare finalists head-to-head.