Model review

ASUS Vivobook 14 Flip (TP3407) review

ASUS Vivobook 14 Flip (TP3407) — from 2025, 1.57 kg, performance 45.

ASUS

Technical specifications

Type Convertible (2-in-1)
Release year 2025
Screen 14" · 1920x1200
Processor Intel Core Ultra 5 226V , Intel Core Ultra 7 256V , Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
Graphics Intel Arc 130V
Max. RAM 32 GB
Weight 1.57 kg
Battery 70 Wh

Performance scores

Performance
45
/100
CPU
84
/100
GPU
0
/100
USComp
43
/100

A one-year-old convertible that spends its budget on the hinge and the years

The Vivobook 14 Flip (TP3407) arrived in 2025 and asks $1,275 on the used shelf today. That is a premium ticket for a 14-inch convertible, and the data explains what it buys: a reliability index of 86 against a convertible-class median of 49 — a 75.5 percent advantage that places it in the top quartile for expected longevity — and Core Ultra 5 226V compute measuring 83.94 against a 59.6 median, also top-quartile. What the premium does not buy is a graphics story: the Arc 130V integrated graphics has no matched scoring entry in the pipeline, and that absence is stored as zero — an artifact of coverage, not a measured weakness. Verify at the source before treating it as a verdict.

Reliability and compute, in that order

The two verified strengths compound. A reliability reading of 86 in a class where the median machine scores 49 means the odds of this chassis staying serviceable years into ownership are among the better bets on the convertible shelf. The 226V processor backs it with an 83.94 compute score — 40.8 percent above class median — which covers document work, browser tabs, calls, and light content editing without the fan acting up. For a machine whose whole point is folding into a tablet, that pairing of quiet endurance and ready compute is the product.

The graphics column reads zero — read it carefully

The highlights place graphics at zero against a 3.84 class median. That zero is a coverage artifact: the Arc 130V simply has no matched entry in the scoring tables this catalog runs on. The honest framing is that graphics here are unmeasured by these axes, not absent from the silicon — integrated Arc graphics ship with every 226V. The capability sheet is likewise empty, so no gaming claim of any level survives the data. A buyer who needs a 3D or gaming machine should look elsewhere; a buyer who needs everything else will not miss the column.

No depreciation anchor — judge the ticket on its face

The pricing pipeline has no launch anchor for this configuration, so there is no measured value trajectory to cite. The class-level rate of 15 percent per year applies in the abstract: a convertible bought at this tier today would project to roughly three-quarters of its price after two years on typical decay. Without a baseline the honest move is to judge the $1,275 ticket against the verified strengths above — longevity odds and compute — rather than against an assumed discount curve.

Positioning on the shelf

The analog engine returns no peers for this configuration, which is itself information: at the intersection of one-year-old convertible, 32 GB of memory, and this ticket, the machine sits alone. Within this batch, the Snapdragon convertibles trade at lower tickets with perfect reliability scores but ARM-shaped compatibility caveats, while the Intel business convertibles a generation older carry similar compute for less money and none of the hinge. The TP3407's corner of the shelf is genuinely its own.

Bottom line

This is a buy-the-years machine. The reliability and compute readings are verified, top-quartile, and recent; the graphics column is an unmeasured blank rather than a counted failure; and the price is premium but anchored to longevity, not to frames. It suits a buyer who folds, carries, and keeps — and who has already accepted that gaming is not part of the contract.

🧭 Your context

Stage: Vague sense of need

Browse category overviews to narrow things down.

⚙️ Configuration analysis

Top configuration: Intel Core Ultra 5 226V · Intel Arc 130V · 32GB RAM
CPU: Intel Core Ultra 5 226V · Ultra 2 GPU: Intel Arc 130V RAM: 32 GB
high tier

Top configuration handles modern AAA games at high settings, video editing, and heavy multitasking.

🤔 How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 49) ↔ price (median 355.7).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 68) ↔ overall performance (median 37.4).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 4.7).

Vivobook 14 Flip (TP3407): verdict

+
Best for: long-term reliability
!
Watch out for: gaming and GPU-accelerated tasks

➡️ Next step

Browse category overviews to narrow things down.

Technical reference for ASUS Vivobook 14 Flip (TP3407).

Full specifications

Brand
ASUS
Series
VivoBook
Type
Convertible (2-in-1)
Release year
2025
Screen size
14"
Resolution
1920x1200
Panel type
oled
Color gamut (sRGB)
100%~
Graphics
Intel Arc 130V
RAM (max)
32 GB LPDDR5X
Weight
1.57 kg
Ports
6
Thunderbolt
Battery
70 Wh

Performance scores

Performance
45
/100
CPU
84
/100
GPU
0
/100
USComp
32
/100

Performance metrics

Performance 45
Portability 66
Light office 73
Gaming 19
Creative 12
Energy efficiency 93
Connectivity 100
Value 45
Color accuracy
🎮

No FPS data for this model's GPU.

The GPU may be integrated or not yet benchmarked.

💻 Software compatibility

Counter-Strike 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
168%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Grand Theft Auto V ✗ Weak
CPU
420%
GPU
0%
RAM
800%
Cyberpunk 2077 ✗ Weak
CPU
240%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Minecraft ✗ Weak
CPU
839%
GPU
0%
RAM
800%
Fortnite ✗ Weak
CPU
153%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Valorant ✗ Weak
CPU
560%
GPU
0%
RAM
800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt ✗ Weak
CPU
280%
GPU
0%
RAM
533%
Elden Ring ✗ Weak
CPU
153%
GPU
0%
RAM
267%
Red Dead Redemption 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
280%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Apex Legends ✗ Weak
CPU
153%
GPU
0%
RAM
533%
Hogwarts Legacy ✗ Weak
CPU
187%
GPU
0%
RAM
200%
Dota 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
560%
GPU
0%
RAM
800%
Baldur's Gate 3 ✗ Weak
CPU
153%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Starfield ✗ Weak
CPU
120%
GPU
0%
RAM
200%
Call of Duty: Warzone ✗ Weak
CPU
153%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
League of Legends ✗ Weak
CPU
839%
GPU
0%
RAM
999%
Sims 4 ✗ Weak
CPU
560%
GPU
0%
RAM
800%
Helldivers 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
120%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Battlefield 5 ✗ Weak
CPU
187%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Far Cry 5 ✗ Weak
CPU
210%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Forza Horizon 4 ✗ Weak
CPU
240%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Forza Horizon 5 ✗ Weak
CPU
187%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Metro Exodus ✗ Weak
CPU
210%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Overwatch ✗ Weak
CPU
336%
GPU
0%
RAM
800%
PUBG: Battlegrounds ✗ Weak
CPU
210%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Resident Evil 4 Remake ✗ Weak
CPU
168%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Escape from Tarkov ✗ Weak
CPU
280%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
God of War ✗ Weak
CPU
382%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Horizon Zero Dawn ✗ Weak
CPU
382%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Death Stranding ✗ Weak
CPU
336%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Control ✗ Weak
CPU
280%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Doom Eternal ✗ Weak
CPU
382%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Batman: Arkham Knight ✗ Weak
CPU
466%
GPU
0%
RAM
533%
Hitman 3 ✗ Weak
CPU
382%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Flight Simulator 2020 ✗ Weak
CPU
300%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Watch Dogs Legion ✗ Weak
CPU
300%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Borderlands 3 ✗ Weak
CPU
336%
GPU
0%
RAM
533%
Anno 1800 ✗ Weak
CPU
280%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Rainbow Six Siege ✗ Weak
CPU
700%
GPU
0%
RAM
533%
The Division 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
382%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Gears Tactics ✗ Weak
CPU
336%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Hunt Showdown ✗ Weak
CPU
300%
GPU
0%
RAM
533%
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands ✗ Weak
CPU
280%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Mafia Definitive Edition ✗ Weak
CPU
382%
GPU
0%
RAM
533%
Days Gone ✗ Weak
CPU
382%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Ghostwire Tokyo ✗ Weak
CPU
200%
GPU
0%
RAM
267%
Returnal ✗ Weak
CPU
240%
GPU
0%
RAM
200%
Dying Light 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
280%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Resident Evil Village ✗ Weak
CPU
240%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
The Callisto Protocol ✗ Weak
CPU
168%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Atomic Heart ✗ Weak
CPU
262%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Alan Wake 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
200%
GPU
0%
RAM
200%
Black Myth Wukong ✗ Weak
CPU
168%
GPU
0%
RAM
200%
Ghost of Tsushima ✗ Weak
CPU
168%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
The Last of Us Part 1 ✗ Weak
CPU
168%
GPU
0%
RAM
200%
Diablo 4 ✗ Weak
CPU
382%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Spider-Man Miles Morales ✗ Weak
CPU
280%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Star Wars Jedi Survivor ✗ Weak
CPU
168%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Dead Space Remake ✗ Weak
CPU
262%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Lies of P ✗ Weak
CPU
240%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Sons of the Forest ✗ Weak
CPU
168%
GPU
0%
RAM
267%
Rise of the Tomb Raider ✗ Weak
CPU
560%
GPU
0%
RAM
800%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider ✗ Weak
CPU
466%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey ✗ Weak
CPU
420%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla ✗ Weak
CPU
240%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
F1 24 ✗ Weak
CPU
466%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Need for Speed Heat ✗ Weak
CPU
240%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Civilization 6 ✗ Weak
CPU
560%
GPU
0%
RAM
800%
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order ✗ Weak
CPU
466%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%

Configuration options

Available model options · 10 variants across 5 categories

🔋 Batteries (1)
70 Wh
⚙ Processors (3)
Intel Core Ultra 5 226V Intel Core Ultra 7 256V Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
🎮 Graphics (1)
Intel Arc 130V
🔲 Memory (2)
16GB 32GB
💾 Storage (3)
256GB 512GB 1024GB

Similar models

Explore alternatives across different angles.