Model review

ASUS Vivobook 16 Flip (TP3607) review

ASUS Vivobook 16 Flip (TP3607) — from 2025, 1.78 kg, performance 45.

ASUS

Technical specifications

Type Convertible (2-in-1)
Release year 2025
Screen 16" · 2880x1800
Processor Intel Core Ultra 5 226V , Intel Core Ultra 7 256V , Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
Graphics Intel Arc 130V
Max. RAM 32 GB
Weight 1.78 kg
Battery 75 Wh

Performance scores

Performance
45
/100
CPU
84
/100
GPU
0
/100
USComp
43
/100

The big convertible on efficiency silicon

The ASUS Vivobook 16 Flip (TP3607) is a 2025 convertible: an Intel Core Ultra 5 226V with Arc 130V graphics and 32GB of memory at $1,275. The sheet reads reliability at 86 — seventy-six percent above the class median, top-quartile — and the processor at 83.94, also top-quartile, as the strengths; the graphics column reads zero, the recorded weak axis with the platform's standing coverage story.

The form premium, honestly priced

A sixteen-inch 360-degree convertible is a form-factor purchase: the hinge and the touch layer are the product, and the sheet supports them with the 226V platform's measured strengths — top-quartile compute and reliability. The Arc 130V zero is the coverage gap this batch has documented three times over: no scoring entry for the current integrated silicon, absence stored as zero, capability sheet empty. The honest product statement is a large pen-and-touch machine with current-generation efficiency compute and years of expected service.

The twelve-seventy-five question

At $1,275 the ticket prices well above the convertible floor — this batch's Celeron-based Go 14 Flip asks $666 — and the difference buys the platform: three generations of silicon, top-quartile reliability, the 32GB ceiling. Against the ARM tablets at the same money the trade is the x86 toolchain's compatibility against their perfect longevity readings. The buyer at this number is choosing a form and a software ecosystem together; the sheet supports the first and cannot answer the second's edge cases.

No depreciation anchor

No release-price anchor is recorded; the platform convention runs near fifteen percent per year. The 2025 platform's curve is young; the reliability figure is the measured argument for the ticket.

Positioning against the aisle

No recorded analogs fall within the comparison band. The honest neighbors are form-factor ones: the cheaper Flip below and the ARM detachables above — this seat is the x86 middle path with the strongest measured compute among them.

Bottom line

A fairly-priced large convertible carrying current efficiency silicon, top-quartile compute and longevity, with an honestly-unread graphics column. Buy it for the form and the platform; treat the zero as a coverage note and verify visual workloads at the source.

🧭 Your context

Stage: Vague sense of need

Browse category overviews to narrow things down.

⚙️ Configuration analysis

Top configuration: Intel Core Ultra 5 226V · Intel Arc 130V · 32GB RAM
CPU: Intel Core Ultra 5 226V · Ultra 2 GPU: Intel Arc 130V RAM: 32 GB
high tier

Top configuration handles modern AAA games at high settings, video editing, and heavy multitasking.

🤔 How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 49) ↔ price (median 355.7).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 68) ↔ overall performance (median 37.4).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 4.7).

Vivobook 16 Flip (TP3607): verdict

+
Best for: long-term reliability
!
Watch out for: gaming and GPU-accelerated tasks

➡️ Next step

Browse category overviews to narrow things down.

Technical reference for ASUS Vivobook 16 Flip (TP3607).

Full specifications

Brand
ASUS
Series
VivoBook
Type
Convertible (2-in-1)
Release year
2025
Screen size
16"
Resolution
2880x1800
Panel type
oled
Color gamut (sRGB)
100%~
Graphics
Intel Arc 130V
RAM (max)
32 GB LPDDR5X
Weight
1.78 kg
Ports
6
Thunderbolt
Battery
75 Wh

Performance scores

Performance
45
/100
CPU
84
/100
GPU
0
/100
USComp
32
/100

Performance metrics

Performance 45
Portability 43
Light office 73
Gaming 19
Creative 12
Energy efficiency 93
Connectivity 100
Value 45
Color accuracy
🎮

No FPS data for this model's GPU.

The GPU may be integrated or not yet benchmarked.

💻 Software compatibility

Counter-Strike 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
168%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Grand Theft Auto V ✗ Weak
CPU
420%
GPU
0%
RAM
800%
Cyberpunk 2077 ✗ Weak
CPU
240%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Minecraft ✗ Weak
CPU
839%
GPU
0%
RAM
800%
Fortnite ✗ Weak
CPU
153%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Valorant ✗ Weak
CPU
560%
GPU
0%
RAM
800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt ✗ Weak
CPU
280%
GPU
0%
RAM
533%
Elden Ring ✗ Weak
CPU
153%
GPU
0%
RAM
267%
Red Dead Redemption 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
280%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Apex Legends ✗ Weak
CPU
153%
GPU
0%
RAM
533%
Hogwarts Legacy ✗ Weak
CPU
187%
GPU
0%
RAM
200%
Dota 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
560%
GPU
0%
RAM
800%
Baldur's Gate 3 ✗ Weak
CPU
153%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Starfield ✗ Weak
CPU
120%
GPU
0%
RAM
200%
Call of Duty: Warzone ✗ Weak
CPU
153%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
League of Legends ✗ Weak
CPU
839%
GPU
0%
RAM
999%
Sims 4 ✗ Weak
CPU
560%
GPU
0%
RAM
800%
Helldivers 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
120%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Battlefield 5 ✗ Weak
CPU
187%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Far Cry 5 ✗ Weak
CPU
210%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Forza Horizon 4 ✗ Weak
CPU
240%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Forza Horizon 5 ✗ Weak
CPU
187%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Metro Exodus ✗ Weak
CPU
210%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Overwatch ✗ Weak
CPU
336%
GPU
0%
RAM
800%
PUBG: Battlegrounds ✗ Weak
CPU
210%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Resident Evil 4 Remake ✗ Weak
CPU
168%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Escape from Tarkov ✗ Weak
CPU
280%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
God of War ✗ Weak
CPU
382%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Horizon Zero Dawn ✗ Weak
CPU
382%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Death Stranding ✗ Weak
CPU
336%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Control ✗ Weak
CPU
280%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Doom Eternal ✗ Weak
CPU
382%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Batman: Arkham Knight ✗ Weak
CPU
466%
GPU
0%
RAM
533%
Hitman 3 ✗ Weak
CPU
382%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Flight Simulator 2020 ✗ Weak
CPU
300%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Watch Dogs Legion ✗ Weak
CPU
300%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Borderlands 3 ✗ Weak
CPU
336%
GPU
0%
RAM
533%
Anno 1800 ✗ Weak
CPU
280%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Rainbow Six Siege ✗ Weak
CPU
700%
GPU
0%
RAM
533%
The Division 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
382%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Gears Tactics ✗ Weak
CPU
336%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Hunt Showdown ✗ Weak
CPU
300%
GPU
0%
RAM
533%
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands ✗ Weak
CPU
280%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Mafia Definitive Edition ✗ Weak
CPU
382%
GPU
0%
RAM
533%
Days Gone ✗ Weak
CPU
382%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Ghostwire Tokyo ✗ Weak
CPU
200%
GPU
0%
RAM
267%
Returnal ✗ Weak
CPU
240%
GPU
0%
RAM
200%
Dying Light 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
280%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Resident Evil Village ✗ Weak
CPU
240%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
The Callisto Protocol ✗ Weak
CPU
168%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Atomic Heart ✗ Weak
CPU
262%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Alan Wake 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
200%
GPU
0%
RAM
200%
Black Myth Wukong ✗ Weak
CPU
168%
GPU
0%
RAM
200%
Ghost of Tsushima ✗ Weak
CPU
168%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
The Last of Us Part 1 ✗ Weak
CPU
168%
GPU
0%
RAM
200%
Diablo 4 ✗ Weak
CPU
382%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Spider-Man Miles Morales ✗ Weak
CPU
280%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Star Wars Jedi Survivor ✗ Weak
CPU
168%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Dead Space Remake ✗ Weak
CPU
262%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Lies of P ✗ Weak
CPU
240%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Sons of the Forest ✗ Weak
CPU
168%
GPU
0%
RAM
267%
Rise of the Tomb Raider ✗ Weak
CPU
560%
GPU
0%
RAM
800%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider ✗ Weak
CPU
466%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey ✗ Weak
CPU
420%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla ✗ Weak
CPU
240%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
F1 24 ✗ Weak
CPU
466%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Need for Speed Heat ✗ Weak
CPU
240%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Civilization 6 ✗ Weak
CPU
560%
GPU
0%
RAM
800%
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order ✗ Weak
CPU
466%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%

Configuration options

Available model options · 11 variants across 5 categories

🔋 Batteries (1)
75 Wh
⚙ Processors (3)
Intel Core Ultra 5 226V Intel Core Ultra 7 256V Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
🎮 Graphics (1)
Intel Arc 130V
🔲 Memory (3)
8GB 16GB 32GB
💾 Storage (3)
256GB 512GB 1024GB

Similar models

Explore alternatives across different angles.