GPU guide

Quadro K3000M: FPS benchmarks and laptop guide

Quadro K3000M — 16 games benchmarked at 1080p, 2 models in the catalog.

Quadro K3000M — 16 games benchmarked at 1080p , 2 laptop models in the used-laptop catalog . This guide covers what the chip delivers in games, where it sits among mobile GPUs in 2026, and which laptops carry it.

The Quadro K3000M is NVIDIA's 2012 Kepler professional GPU for the big-chassis workstation generation — GK104 silicon cut down to entry-professional scale. This guide covers its 16 benchmarked games at 1080p on the high preset and the 2 catalog models that carry it.

Where the Quadro K3000M sits in 2026

A catalog score of 5.5 ranks it 273rd of 341 — the bottom fifth. The neighbors: the Virtio-GPU Venus (6), GeForce 840M (5.8) and Iris Graphics 540 (5.6) above; the Radeon 8050S (5.5), R7 M460 (5.3) and R7 M260X (5.1) below. A 2012 professional card ranked among entry 2014-2015 graphics is the expected arithmetic of fourteen years of progress.

What the chip brings

Kepler on 28nm, GK104 die: 576 CUDA cores at up to 654MHz, 2GB of GDDR5 on a 256-bit bus with 89GB/s, a 75W envelope, 0.75 teraflops. Public benchmarks: PassMark 1623, OpenCL compute 4272. The wide bus and modest clocks were tuned for workstation steadiness rather than gaming throughput — and the score shows it.

FPS in games at 1080p

At the high preset: Valorant at 50, DOTA 2 at 35, Fortnite at 21, Forza Horizon 4 at 18, Counter-Strike 2 at 16, Battlefield 5 at 14, The Witcher 3 at 12, Far Cry 5 and Forza Horizon 5 at 10 each. The bottom: Cyberpunk 2077 at 8, Metro Exodus at 7, the Resident Evil 4 remake at 5. Light esports at reduced settings is the honest envelope.

Laptops that carry it

Two listings, both 2012 17-inch workstations: the Dell Precision M6700 at $309 and HP EliteBook 8770w at $289. Fleet medians: best-CPU 34.3, gaming index 23, mobility 5 — the graphics median equals this chip. These are tank-class professional machines of the early 2010s; the same chassis generation also hosts the Fermi-based Quadro 3000M covered separately in this catalog.

Bottom line

The K3000M is a buy-for-the-chassis GPU: excellent build, terrible ranking, honest little table. The M6700 and 8770w are $289-309 of old-school workstation metal whose value now lies in build and keyboard. Light esports remains possible; anything modern is not — the table below is the complete story.

🧭 Your context

Stage: Refining requirements

You're refining — compare finalists head-to-head.

🎯 For your profile

You've viewed: You've recently viewed 12 models — compare this model with them in the analogs matrix.

Quadro K3000M at a glance

Catalog score
5.5
#273 of 341 mobile GPUs
Games @ 1080p
16
Laptops
2
models in the catalog
Released
2012
VRAM
2 GB GDDR5
Memory bus
256-bit
Bandwidth
89 GB/s
Shader cores
576
Boost clock
0.7 GHz
TDP
75 W
Process
28 nm
FP32
0.8 TFLOPS
Architecture
Kepler
Codename
GK104
PassMark: 1,623 GeekBench OpenCL: 4,272
CUDA

🤔 How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).

🎮 Quadro K3000M — game FPS at 1080p

Average FPS per game, high quality preset.

Game FPS (1080p) Verdict
Overwatch 240 ✓ Comfortable
PUBG: Battlegrounds 140 ✓ Comfortable
Valorant 50 ⚠ Playable
Dota 2 35 ⚠ Playable
Fortnite 21 ✗ Low
Forza Horizon 4 18 ✗ Low
Battlefield 5 14 ✗ Low
Far Cry 5 10 ✗ Low
Forza Horizon 5 10 ✗ Low
Cyberpunk 2077 8 ✗ Low
Metro Exodus 7 ✗ Low
Resident Evil 4 Remake 5 ✗ Low
CS:GO 240 ✓ Comfortable
GTA V 140 ✓ Comfortable
Counter-Strike 2 16 ✗ Low
The Witcher 3 12 ✗ Low
16 benchmarked games — full spec page. Verdicts: ✓ comfortable (≥60 FPS), ⚠ playable (30–59), ✗ low (<30). "~" marks estimated values.

Laptops with the Quadro K3000M

2 matched models — newest first. Names link to the full review.

Model Year Class Price
Dell Precision M6700 2012 Workstation $309
EliteBook 8770w 2012 Business $289

➡️ Next step

You're refining — compare finalists head-to-head.