Quadro T1000 Max-Q: FPS benchmarks and laptop guide
Quadro T1000 with Max-Q Design — 43 games benchmarked at 1080p, 12 models in the catalog.
Quadro T1000 with Max-Q Design — 43 games benchmarked at 1080p , 12 laptop models in the used-laptop catalog . This guide covers what the chip delivers in games, where it sits among mobile GPUs in 2026, and which laptops carry it.
The Quadro T1000 with Max-Q Design is the clocked-down variant of NVIDIA's 2019 mobile workstation GPU, tuned for thinner chassis. This guide covers its 43 benchmarked games at 1080p (34 with medium-preset data), the same 12 workstation models matched to the T1000 family, and — unusually — why its catalog record ranks slightly above the standard card.
Where the Quadro T1000 Max-Q sits in 2026
Here's the twist: the Max-Q record scores 46.2 and ranks 137th of 341 — one slot above the standard Quadro T1000 at 45.9. Max-Q is supposed to mean slower, and in this case the badge clearly doesn't guarantee it. The supporting data shows how close these records really are: PassMark 6507 versus 6513 for the standard card (a rounding error), while the Vulkan compute score actually reads higher here at 30628 versus 29725. This is unit-level variance — binning, cooling and chassis implementation move real Max-Q machines by more than the badge does. Neighbors on either side: the GeForce GTX 1060 laptop card (46.4) above, the Radeon Graphics record (45.9) and Radeon Pro 5500M (45.4) below.
What the chip brings
The same 768-core, 12nm Turing design as the standard T1000, with the same 4GB of GDDR5 and 50W-class envelope, differentiated only by factory tuning for efficiency. CUDA support and professional drivers carry over intact. What the record-level specs don't capture is the practical spread: two machines both labeled Max-Q can differ from each other by more than they differ from standard-T1000 machines, which is exactly what the score inversion here illustrates.
FPS in games at 1080p
The 43-game table is effectively identical to the standard T1000's — as you'd expect for records this close: FIFA 20 at 160 (171 on medium), Rocket League at 117 (151), Rainbow Six Siege at 112, Farming Simulator 19 at 86, Escape from Tarkov at 68, Doom Eternal at 64. Single-player heavyweights land at The Witcher 3's 53, Far Cry 5's 57 on high, and Metro Exodus's 32 — with medium presets adding comfortable headroom across the board.
Laptops that carry it
No listing in the catalog carries the Max-Q name specifically — the roster is the same 12 workstation models name-matched to the T1000 family: Dell Precision 5540 through 7750, HP ZBook Studio G5 through 17 G7, and Lenovo ThinkPad P1 and P15 generations, spanning 2018–2021 at $325–640. That's the Max-Q reality in the used market: you buy the machine, and which record its silicon most resembles depends more on its cooling than on its badge.
Bottom line
Treat this page as the second opinion on the Quadro T1000: same silicon, same machines, same table, and a ranked score that lands a hair higher — proof that the Max-Q suffix alone tells you almost nothing. If you're choosing between a "T1000" and a "T1000 Max-Q" listing, ignore the suffix and compare the actual machine: chassis size, cooling, condition and price. Both records describe the same practical capability — a solid mid-table workstation GPU for 1080p workloads and disciplined gaming.
🧭 Your context
Stage: Refining requirements
You're refining — compare finalists head-to-head.
🎯 For your profile
You've viewed: You've recently viewed 24 models — compare this model with them in the analogs matrix.
Quadro T1000 with Max-Q Design at a glance
🤔 How to choose
Universal advice for any use case.
- Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
- Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
- Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).
🎮 Quadro T1000 with Max-Q Design — game FPS at 1080p
Average FPS per game, medium and high quality presets.
| Game | Medium (1080p) | High (1080p) | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overwatch | — | 240 | ✓ Comfortable |
| PUBG: Battlegrounds | — | 140 | ✓ Comfortable |
| Dota 2 | — | 113 | ✓ Comfortable |
| Rainbow Six Siege | — | 112 | ✓ Comfortable |
| Grand Theft Auto V | — | 94 | ✓ Comfortable |
| Escape from Tarkov | 88 | 68 | ✓ Comfortable |
| Doom Eternal | 78 | 64 | ✓ Comfortable |
| Apex Legends | 74 | 58 | ⚠ Playable |
| Gears Tactics | 92 | 58 | ⚠ Playable |
| Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order | 67 | 58 | ⚠ Playable |
| Far Cry 5 | 199 | 57 | ⚠ Playable |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider | — | 53 | ⚠ Playable |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | — | 53 | ⚠ Playable |
| Need for Speed Heat | 61 | 52 | ⚠ Playable |
| Call of Duty: Warzone | 61 | 51 | ⚠ Playable |
| Hunt Showdown | 51 | 44 | ⚠ Playable |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 46 | 40 | ⚠ Playable |
| Battlefield 5 | 43 | 38 | ⚠ Playable |
| Borderlands 3 | 59 | 38 | ⚠ Playable |
| Anno 1800 | 53 | 37 | ⚠ Playable |
| The Division 2 | 39 | 36 | ⚠ Playable |
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 40 | 35 | ⚠ Playable |
| Metro Exodus | 43 | 32 | ⚠ Playable |
| Control | 42 | 31 | ⚠ Playable |
Laptops with the Quadro T1000 with Max-Q Design
12 matched models — newest first. Names link to the full review.
| Model | Year | Class | Price |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dell Precision 3561 | 2021 | Workstation | $405 |
| Dell Precision 7750 | 2020 | Workstation | $628 |
| Dell Precision 5550 | 2020 | Workstation | $541 |
| ZBook 17 G7 | 2020 | Workstation | $640 |
| ThinkPad P1 Gen 3 | 2020 | Workstation | $566 |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P15 Gen 1 | 2020 | Workstation | $566 |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 2 | 2019 | Ultrabook | $447 |
| Dell Precision 7540 | 2019 | Workstation | $447 |
| Dell Precision 5540 | 2019 | Workstation | $398 |
| ZBook 15 G6 | 2019 | Workstation | $410 |
| ZBook 17 G6 | 2019 | Workstation | $495 |
| HP ZBook Studio G5 | 2018 | Workstation | $325 |
➡️ Next step
You're refining — compare finalists head-to-head.