Component comparison
RTX A500 vs Quadro T1000
RTX A500 vs Quadro T1000 — detailed GPU comparison: performance, gaming FPS, specifications.
Advantages
A
RTX A500
- + Release year (+2)
- + TGP / TDP (W) (+10 W)
- + Lithography (nm) (-4 nm)
- + Boost clock (MHz) (+82 MHz)
- + CUDA cores (+1280)
- + PassMark (overall) (+25)
B
Quadro T1000
- + Memory clock (MHz) (+6250 MHz)
- + Memory bus (bit) (+64 bit)
- + Energy efficiency (+3.9)
- + Normalized score (+30.1)
Detailed spec comparison
| Spec |
Component A
RTX A500
|
Component B
Quadro T1000
|
|---|---|---|
| Release year | 2021 (+2) | 2019 |
| VRAM (GB) | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory clock (MHz) | 1750 MHz | 8000 MHz (+6250 MHz) |
| Bandwidth (GB/s) | 112 GB/s | — |
| Memory bus (bit) | 64 bit | 128 bit (+64 bit) |
| TGP / TDP (W) | 60 W (+10 W) | 50 W |
| Lithography (nm) | 8 nm (-4 nm) | 12 nm |
| Transistors (M) | — | — |
| Die size (mm²) | — | — |
| Base clock (MHz) | — | — |
| Boost clock (MHz) | 1537 MHz (+82 MHz) | 1455 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 2,048 (+1280) | 768 |
| TMUs | 64 | — |
| ROPs | 32 | — |
| RT cores | 16 | — |
| Tensor cores | 64 | — |
| FP32 performance (TFLOPS) | 7.25 TFLOPS | — |
| Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) | — | — |
| Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) | — | — |
| Energy efficiency | 20.2 | 24.1 (+3.9) |
| PassMark (overall) | 6,538 (+25) | 6,513 |
| 3DMark Time Spy | — | — |
| 3DMark Fire Strike | — | — |
| Geekbench OpenCL | — | 33,850 |
| Geekbench Vulkan | — | 29,725 |
| Normalized score | 15.8 | 45.9 (+30.1) |
Only in component A
DLSS
ReBAR
In both
CUDA
FPS in games (1080p)
| Game | RTX A500 | Quadro T1000 | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| CS:GO | 240 FPS | 240 FPS | ≈ |
| GTA V | 140 FPS | 140 FPS | ≈ |
| Overwatch | 240 FPS | 240 FPS | ≈ |
| PUBG | 140 FPS | 140 FPS | ≈ |
Specs from public sources (PassMark, Geekbench). FPS measured at 1080p medium settings.
Based on the comparison:
RTX A500 wins 6 of the comparable criteria.
The choice depends on your use case.
🤔 How to choose
Universal advice for any use case.
- Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
- Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
- Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).