Component comparison

RTX A500 vs GeForce RTX 2050

RTX A500 vs GeForce RTX 2050 — detailed GPU comparison: performance, gaming FPS, specifications.

Advantages

A RTX A500
  • + TGP / TDP (W) (+15 W)
  • + Boost clock (MHz) (+292 MHz)
  • + FP32 performance (TFLOPS) (+2.52 TFLOPS)
B GeForce RTX 2050
  • + RT cores (+16)
  • + Energy efficiency (+9.4)
  • + Normalized score (+39.4)

Detailed spec comparison

Spec Component A
RTX A500
 Component B
GeForce RTX 2050
Release year 2021 2021
VRAM (GB) 4 GB 4 GB
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR6
Memory clock (MHz) 1750 MHz 1750 MHz
Bandwidth (GB/s) 112 GB/s 112 GB/s
Memory bus (bit) 64 bit 64 bit
TGP / TDP (W) 60 W (+15 W) 45 W
Lithography (nm) 8 nm 8 nm
Transistors (M) — 8,700M
Die size (mm²) — 200 mm²
Base clock (MHz) — 735 MHz
Boost clock (MHz) 1537 MHz (+292 MHz) 1245 MHz
CUDA cores 2,048 2,048
TMUs 64 64
ROPs 32 32
RT cores 16 32 (+16)
Tensor cores 64 64
FP32 performance (TFLOPS) 7.25 TFLOPS (+2.52 TFLOPS) 4.73 TFLOPS
Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) — 39.84 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) — 79.68 GTexel/s
Energy efficiency 20.2 29.6 (+9.4)
PassMark (overall) 6,538 —
3DMark Time Spy — 3,221
3DMark Fire Strike — 8,965
Geekbench OpenCL — 44,279
Geekbench Vulkan — 43,030
Normalized score 15.8 55.2 (+39.4)

In both

CUDA DLSS ReBAR

FPS in games (1080p)

Game RTX A500 GeForce RTX 2050 Delta
CS:GO 240 FPS ≈ 240 FPS ≈
GTA V 140 FPS ≈ 140 FPS ≈
Overwatch 240 FPS ≈ 240 FPS ≈
PUBG 140 FPS ≈ 140 FPS ≈

Specs from public sources (PassMark, Geekbench). FPS measured at 1080p medium settings. Values for GeForce RTX 2050 are model predictions (≈); RTX A500 are direct measurements.

Based on the comparison: Components are close in specs. The choice depends on your use case.

🤔 How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).
All reviews