Component comparison
RTX A500 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
RTX A500 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti — detailed GPU comparison: performance, gaming FPS, specifications.
Advantages
A
RTX A500
- + Release year (+5)
- + Lithography (nm) (-6 nm)
- + CUDA cores (+1280)
- + TMUs (+16)
- + FP32 performance (TFLOPS) (+5.07 TFLOPS)
- + Energy efficiency (+4.5)
- + PassMark (overall) (+175)
B
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
- + Memory bus (bit) (+64 bit)
- + TGP / TDP (W) (+15 W)
- + Normalized score (+24.9)
Detailed spec comparison
| Spec |
Component A
RTX A500
|
Component B
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
|
|---|---|---|
| Release year | 2021 (+5) | 2016 |
| VRAM (GB) | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory clock (MHz) | 1750 MHz | — |
| Bandwidth (GB/s) | 112 GB/s | 112 GB/s |
| Memory bus (bit) | 64 bit | 128 bit (+64 bit) |
| TGP / TDP (W) | 60 W | 75 W (+15 W) |
| Lithography (nm) | 8 nm (-6 nm) | 14 nm |
| Transistors (M) | — | 3,300M |
| Die size (mm²) | — | 132 mm² |
| Base clock (MHz) | — | — |
| Boost clock (MHz) | 1537 MHz | — |
| CUDA cores | 2,048 (+1280) | 768 |
| TMUs | 64 (+16) | 48 |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| RT cores | 16 | — |
| Tensor cores | 64 | — |
| FP32 performance (TFLOPS) | 7.25 TFLOPS (+5.07 TFLOPS) | 2.18 TFLOPS |
| Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) | — | 44.54 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) | — | 66.82 GTexel/s |
| Energy efficiency | 20.2 (+4.5) | 15.8 |
| PassMark (overall) | 6,538 (+175) | 6,363 |
| 3DMark Time Spy | — | 2,261 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike | — | 7,485 |
| Geekbench OpenCL | — | 20,654 |
| Geekbench Vulkan | — | 19,790 |
| Normalized score | 15.8 | 40.8 (+24.9) |
Only in component A
DLSS
ReBAR
In both
CUDA
FPS in games (1080p)
| Game | RTX A500 | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| CS:GO | 240 FPS | 240 FPS | ≈ |
| GTA V | 140 FPS | 140 FPS | ≈ |
| Overwatch | 240 FPS | 240 FPS | ≈ |
| PUBG | 140 FPS | 140 FPS | ≈ |
Specs from public sources (PassMark, Geekbench). FPS measured at 1080p medium settings.
Based on the comparison:
RTX A500 wins 7 of the comparable criteria.
The choice depends on your use case.
🤔 How to choose
Universal advice for any use case.
- Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
- Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
- Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).