Component comparison
RTX A1000 vs GeForce 940M
RTX A1000 vs GeForce 940M — detailed GPU comparison: performance, gaming FPS, specifications.
Advantages
A
RTX A1000
- + Release year (+9)
- + VRAM (GB) (+6 GB)
- + Memory clock (MHz) (+600 MHz)
- + Bandwidth (GB/s) (+210 GB/s)
- + Memory bus (bit) (+64 bit)
- + Lithography (nm) (-20 nm)
- + CUDA cores (+1920)
- + TMUs (+48)
- + ROPs (+24)
- + FP32 performance (TFLOPS) (+5.83 TFLOPS)
- + Energy efficiency (+33.5)
- + PassMark (overall) (+9620)
- + Geekbench OpenCL (+47619)
- + Geekbench Vulkan (+45895)
- + Normalized score (+51.0)
B
GeForce 940M
- + TGP / TDP (W) (+25 W)
Detailed spec comparison
| Spec |
Component A
RTX A1000
|
Component B
GeForce 940M
|
|---|---|---|
| Release year | 2024 (+9) | 2015 |
| VRAM (GB) | 8 GB (+6 GB) | 2 GB |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | DDR3 |
| Memory clock (MHz) | 1500 MHz (+600 MHz) | 900 MHz |
| Bandwidth (GB/s) | 224 GB/s (+210 GB/s) | 14 GB/s |
| Memory bus (bit) | 128 bit (+64 bit) | 64 bit |
| TGP / TDP (W) | 50 W | 75 W (+25 W) |
| Lithography (nm) | 8 nm (-20 nm) | 28 nm |
| Transistors (M) | — | 1,870M |
| Die size (mm²) | — | 148 mm² |
| Base clock (MHz) | — | 1020 MHz |
| Boost clock (MHz) | — | 1098 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 2,304 (+1920) | 384 |
| TMUs | 72 (+48) | 24 |
| ROPs | 32 (+24) | 8 |
| RT cores | 18 | — |
| Tensor cores | 72 | — |
| FP32 performance (TFLOPS) | 6.74 TFLOPS (+5.83 TFLOPS) | 0.90 TFLOPS |
| Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) | — | 17.57 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) | — | 35.14 GTexel/s |
| Energy efficiency | 39.9 (+33.5) | 6.4 |
| PassMark (overall) | 10,753 (+9620) | 1,133 |
| 3DMark Time Spy | — | — |
| 3DMark Fire Strike | — | 1,622 |
| Geekbench OpenCL | 53,644 (+47619) | 6,025 |
| Geekbench Vulkan | 50,444 (+45895) | 4,549 |
| Normalized score | 57.2 (+51.0) | 6.2 |
Only in component A
DLSS
ReBAR
In both
CUDA
FPS in games (1080p)
| Game | RTX A1000 | GeForce 940M | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| CS:GO | 240 FPS | 240 FPS | ≈ |
| GTA V | 140 FPS | 140 FPS | ≈ |
| Overwatch | 240 FPS | 240 FPS | ≈ |
| PUBG | 140 FPS | 140 FPS | ≈ |
Specs from public sources (PassMark, Geekbench). FPS measured at 1080p medium settings.
Based on the comparison:
RTX A1000 wins 15 of the comparable criteria.
The choice depends on your use case.
🤔 How to choose
Universal advice for any use case.
- Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
- Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
- Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).