Component comparison

Quadro T1000 vs GeForce RTX 2070

Quadro T1000 vs GeForce RTX 2070 — detailed GPU comparison: performance, gaming FPS, specifications.

Advantages

A Quadro T1000
  • + Release year (+1)
  • + Energy efficiency (+7.1)
B GeForce RTX 2070
  • + VRAM (GB) (+4 GB)
  • + Memory bus (bit) (+128 bit)
  • + TGP / TDP (W) (+30 W)
  • + CUDA cores (+1536)
  • + PassMark (overall) (+9550)
  • + Geekbench OpenCL (+54587)
  • + Geekbench Vulkan (+53683)
  • + Normalized score (+24.6)

Detailed spec comparison

Spec Component A
Quadro T1000
 Component B
GeForce RTX 2070
Release year 2019 (+1) 2018
VRAM (GB) 4 GB 8 GB (+4 GB)
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR6
Memory clock (MHz) 8000 MHz —
Bandwidth (GB/s) — 448 GB/s
Memory bus (bit) 128 bit 256 bit (+128 bit)
TGP / TDP (W) 50 W 80 W (+30 W)
Lithography (nm) 12 nm 12 nm
Transistors (M) — 10,800M
Die size (mm²) — 445 mm²
Base clock (MHz) — —
Boost clock (MHz) 1455 MHz —
CUDA cores 768 2,304 (+1536)
TMUs — 144
ROPs — 64
RT cores — 36
Tensor cores — 288
FP32 performance (TFLOPS) — 5.46 TFLOPS
Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) — 103.70 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) — 233.30 GTexel/s
Energy efficiency 24.1 (+7.1) 17.0
PassMark (overall) 6,513 16,063 (+9550)
3DMark Time Spy — 6,661
3DMark Fire Strike — 23,186
Geekbench OpenCL 33,850 88,437 (+54587)
Geekbench Vulkan 29,725 83,408 (+53683)
Normalized score 45.9 70.5 (+24.6)

Only in component B

DLSS

In both

CUDA

FPS in games (1080p)

Game Quadro T1000 GeForce RTX 2070 Delta
Anno 1800 37 FPS 69 FPS 86.5% (B)
Apex Legends 58 FPS 128 FPS 120.7% (B)
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey 35 FPS 84 FPS 140% (B)
Battlefield V 38 FPS 92 FPS 142.1% (B)
Borderlands 3 38 FPS 71 FPS 86.8% (B)
CS:GO 240 FPS 240 FPS ≈
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019 51 FPS 113 FPS 121.6% (B)
Control 31 FPS 68 FPS 119.4% (B)
Dirt Rally 2.0 64 FPS 117 FPS 82.8% (B)
Doom Eternal 64 FPS 149 FPS 132.8% (B)
Dota 2 Reborn 113 FPS 127 FPS 12.4% (B)
Escape from Tarkov 68 FPS 119 FPS 75% (B)
F1 2019 61 FPS 139 FPS 127.9% (B)
FIFA 19 114 FPS 287 FPS 151.8% (B)
FIFA 20 160 FPS 190 FPS 18.8% (B)
Far Cry 5 57 FPS 103 FPS 80.7% (B)
Far Cry New Dawn 46 FPS 91 FPS 97.8% (B)
Farming Simulator 19 86 FPS 162 FPS 88.4% (B)
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark 31 FPS 77 FPS 148.4% (B)
For Honor 64 FPS 156 FPS 143.8% (B)
GRID 2019 65 FPS 104 FPS 60% (B)
GTA V 140 FPS 140 FPS ≈
GTA V 94 FPS 127 FPS 35.1% (B)
Gears Tactics 58 FPS 115 FPS 98.3% (B)
Ghost Recon Breakpoint 47 FPS 89 FPS 89.4% (B)
Ghost Recon Wildlands 44 FPS 99 FPS 125% (B)
Hunt Showdown 44 FPS 101 FPS 129.5% (B)
Kingdom Come: Deliverance 41 FPS 97 FPS 136.6% (B)
Metro Exodus 32 FPS 61 FPS 90.6% (B)
Need for Speed Heat 52 FPS 84 FPS 61.5% (B)
Overwatch 240 FPS 240 FPS ≈
PUBG 140 FPS 140 FPS ≈
Rage 2 46 FPS 103 FPS 123.9% (B)
Rainbow Six Siege 112 FPS 234 FPS 108.9% (B)
Red Dead Redemption 2 30 FPS 66 FPS 120% (B)
Rise of the Tomb Raider 53 FPS 92 FPS 73.6% (B)
Rocket League 117 FPS 247 FPS 111.1% (B)
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40 FPS 149 FPS 272.5% (B)
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order 58 FPS 92 FPS 58.6% (B)
The Division 2 36 FPS 94 FPS 161.1% (B)
The Witcher 3 53 FPS 116 FPS 118.9% (B)
Total War: Three Kingdoms 38 FPS 89 FPS 134.2% (B)
X-Plane 11.11 57 FPS 72 FPS 26.3% (B)

Specs from public sources (PassMark, Geekbench). FPS measured at 1080p medium settings.

Based on the comparison: GeForce RTX 2070 wins 8 of the comparable criteria. The choice depends on your use case.

🤔 How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).
All reviews