Component comparison

Quadro T1000 vs GeForce RTX 2060

Quadro T1000 vs GeForce RTX 2060 — detailed GPU comparison: performance, gaming FPS, specifications.

Advantages

A Quadro T1000
  • + Memory clock (MHz) (+6250 MHz)
  • + Energy efficiency (+6.0)
B GeForce RTX 2060
  • + VRAM (GB) (+2 GB)
  • + Memory bus (bit) (+64 bit)
  • + TGP / TDP (W) (+65 W)
  • + CUDA cores (+1152)
  • + PassMark (overall) (+7581)
  • + Geekbench OpenCL (+37562)
  • + Geekbench Vulkan (+36133)
  • + Normalized score (+20.5)

Detailed spec comparison

Spec Component A
Quadro T1000
 Component B
GeForce RTX 2060
Release year 2019 2019
VRAM (GB) 4 GB 6 GB (+2 GB)
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR6
Memory clock (MHz) 8000 MHz (+6250 MHz) 1750 MHz
Bandwidth (GB/s) — 336 GB/s
Memory bus (bit) 128 bit 192 bit (+64 bit)
TGP / TDP (W) 50 W 115 W (+65 W)
Lithography (nm) 12 nm 12 nm
Transistors (M) — 10,800M
Die size (mm²) — 445 mm²
Base clock (MHz) — —
Boost clock (MHz) 1455 MHz —
CUDA cores 768 1,920 (+1152)
TMUs — 120
ROPs — 48
RT cores — 30
Tensor cores — 240
FP32 performance (TFLOPS) — 6.45 TFLOPS
Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) — 80.64 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) — 201.60 GTexel/s
Energy efficiency 24.1 (+6.0) 18.1
PassMark (overall) 6,513 14,094 (+7581)
3DMark Time Spy — 6,141
3DMark Fire Strike — 16,331
Geekbench OpenCL 33,850 71,412 (+37562)
Geekbench Vulkan 29,725 65,858 (+36133)
Normalized score 45.9 66.4 (+20.5)

Only in component B

DLSS ray_tracing

In both

CUDA

FPS in games (1080p)

Game Quadro T1000 GeForce RTX 2060 Delta
Anno 1800 37 FPS 61 FPS 64.9% (B)
Apex Legends 58 FPS 105 FPS 81% (B)
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey 35 FPS 68 FPS 94.3% (B)
Battlefield V 38 FPS 104 FPS 173.7% (B)
Borderlands 3 38 FPS 61 FPS 60.5% (B)
CS:GO 240 FPS 240 FPS ≈
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019 51 FPS 74 FPS 45.1% (B)
Control 31 FPS 54 FPS 74.2% (B)
Dirt Rally 2.0 64 FPS 113 FPS 76.6% (B)
Doom Eternal 64 FPS 112 FPS 75% (B)
Dota 2 Reborn 113 FPS 118 FPS 4.4% (B)
Escape from Tarkov 68 FPS 121 FPS 77.9% (B)
F1 2019 61 FPS 122 FPS 100% (B)
FIFA 19 114 FPS 280 FPS 145.6% (B)
FIFA 20 160 FPS 111 FPS +44.1% (A)
Far Cry 5 57 FPS 96 FPS 68.4% (B)
Far Cry New Dawn 46 FPS 77 FPS 67.4% (B)
Farming Simulator 19 86 FPS 151 FPS 75.6% (B)
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark 31 FPS 52 FPS 67.7% (B)
For Honor 64 FPS 132 FPS 106.3% (B)
GRID 2019 65 FPS 65 FPS ≈
GTA V 140 FPS 140 FPS ≈
GTA V 94 FPS 95 FPS 1.1% (B)
Gears Tactics 58 FPS 93 FPS 60.3% (B)
Ghost Recon Breakpoint 47 FPS 74 FPS 57.4% (B)
Ghost Recon Wildlands 44 FPS 86 FPS 95.5% (B)
Hunt Showdown 44 FPS 75 FPS 70.5% (B)
Kingdom Come: Deliverance 41 FPS 83 FPS 102.4% (B)
Metro Exodus 32 FPS 56 FPS 75% (B)
Need for Speed Heat 52 FPS 63 FPS 21.2% (B)
Overwatch 240 FPS 240 FPS ≈
PUBG 140 FPS 140 FPS ≈
Rage 2 46 FPS 73 FPS 58.7% (B)
Rainbow Six Siege 112 FPS 206 FPS 83.9% (B)
Red Dead Redemption 2 30 FPS 51 FPS 70% (B)
Rise of the Tomb Raider 53 FPS 107 FPS 101.9% (B)
Rocket League 117 FPS 181 FPS 54.7% (B)
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40 FPS 122 FPS 205% (B)
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order 58 FPS 66 FPS 13.8% (B)
The Division 2 36 FPS 74 FPS 105.6% (B)
The Witcher 3 53 FPS 74 FPS 39.6% (B)
Total War: Three Kingdoms 38 FPS 67 FPS 76.3% (B)
X-Plane 11.11 57 FPS 56 FPS +1.8% (A)

Specs from public sources (PassMark, Geekbench). FPS measured at 1080p medium settings.

Based on the comparison: GeForce RTX 2060 wins 8 of the comparable criteria. The choice depends on your use case.

🤔 How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).
All reviews