Component comparison
GeForce RTX 5070 vs GeForce RTX 5060
GeForce RTX 5070 vs GeForce RTX 5060 — detailed GPU comparison: performance, gaming FPS, specifications.
Advantages
A
GeForce RTX 5070
- + Memory clock (MHz) (+500 MHz)
- + Bandwidth (GB/s) (+224 GB/s)
- + Memory bus (bit) (+64 bit)
- + TGP / TDP (W) (+55 W)
- + Lithography (nm) (-1 nm)
- + Transistors (M) (+9,200M)
- + CUDA cores (+2304)
- + TMUs (+72)
- + ROPs (+32)
- + RT cores (+18)
- + Tensor cores (+72)
- + FP32 performance (TFLOPS) (+11.69 TFLOPS)
- + Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) (+81.10 GPixel/s)
- + Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) (+182.70 GTexel/s)
- + PassMark (overall) (+2326)
- + 3DMark Fire Strike (+3583)
- + Normalized score (+19.3)
B
GeForce RTX 5060
- + Die size (mm²) (+82 mm²)
- + Energy efficiency (+47.8)
Detailed spec comparison
| Spec |
Component A
GeForce RTX 5070
|
Component B
GeForce RTX 5060
|
|---|---|---|
| Release year | 2025 | 2025 |
| VRAM (GB) | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| Memory clock (MHz) | 2000 MHz (+500 MHz) | 1500 MHz |
| Bandwidth (GB/s) | 672 GB/s (+224 GB/s) | 448 GB/s |
| Memory bus (bit) | 192 bit (+64 bit) | 128 bit |
| TGP / TDP (W) | 100 W (+55 W) | 45 W |
| Lithography (nm) | 4 nm (-1 nm) | 5 nm |
| Transistors (M) | 31,100M (+9,200M) | 21,900M |
| Die size (mm²) | 263 mm² | 181 mm² (+82 mm²) |
| Base clock (MHz) | — | — |
| Boost clock (MHz) | — | — |
| CUDA cores | 6,144 (+2304) | 3,840 |
| TMUs | 192 (+72) | 120 |
| ROPs | 80 (+32) | 48 |
| RT cores | 48 (+18) | 30 |
| Tensor cores | 192 (+72) | 120 |
| FP32 performance (TFLOPS) | 30.87 TFLOPS (+11.69 TFLOPS) | 19.18 TFLOPS |
| Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) | 201.00 GPixel/s (+81.10 GPixel/s) | 119.90 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) | 482.30 GTexel/s (+182.70 GTexel/s) | 299.60 GTexel/s |
| Energy efficiency | 21.3 | 69.2 (+47.8) |
| PassMark (overall) | 19,075 (+2326) | 16,749 |
| 3DMark Time Spy | — | — |
| 3DMark Fire Strike | 34,949 (+3583) | 31,366 |
| Geekbench OpenCL | — | — |
| Geekbench Vulkan | — | — |
| Normalized score | 69.6 (+19.3) | 50.3 |
In both
CUDA
DLSS
ReBAR
ray_tracing
FPS in games (1080p)
| Game | GeForce RTX 5070 | GeForce RTX 5060 | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battlefield 5 | 180 FPS | 130 FPS | +38.5% (A) |
| CS:GO | 240 FPS | 240 FPS | ≈ |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 300 FPS | 220 FPS | +36.4% (A) |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 170 FPS | 95 FPS | +78.9% (A) |
| Far Cry 5 | 322 FPS | 130 FPS | +147.7% (A) |
| Fortnite | 300 FPS | 170 FPS | +76.5% (A) |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 270 FPS | 150 FPS | +80% (A) |
| Forza Horizon 5 | 329 FPS | 255 FPS | +29% (A) |
| GTA V | 140 FPS | 140 FPS | ≈ |
| Metro Exodus | 170 FPS | 95 FPS | +78.9% (A) |
| Overwatch | 240 FPS | 240 FPS | ≈ |
| PUBG | 140 FPS | 140 FPS | ≈ |
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 210 FPS | 110 FPS | +90.9% (A) |
| The Witcher 3 | 436 FPS | 140 FPS | +211.4% (A) |
| Valorant | 400 FPS | 230 FPS | +73.9% (A) |
Specs from public sources (PassMark, Geekbench). FPS measured at 1080p medium settings.
Based on the comparison:
GeForce RTX 5070 wins 17 of the comparable criteria.
The choice depends on your use case.
🤔 How to choose
Universal advice for any use case.
- Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
- Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
- Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).