Component comparison
GeForce RTX 5070 vs GeForce RTX 2070
GeForce RTX 5070 vs GeForce RTX 2070 — detailed GPU comparison: performance, gaming FPS, specifications.
Advantages
A
GeForce RTX 5070
- + Release year (+7)
- + Bandwidth (GB/s) (+224 GB/s)
- + TGP / TDP (W) (+20 W)
- + Lithography (nm) (-8 nm)
- + Transistors (M) (+20,300M)
- + Die size (mm²) (+182 mm²)
- + CUDA cores (+3840)
- + TMUs (+48)
- + ROPs (+16)
- + RT cores (+12)
- + FP32 performance (TFLOPS) (+25.41 TFLOPS)
- + Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) (+97.30 GPixel/s)
- + Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) (+249.00 GTexel/s)
- + Energy efficiency (+4.3)
- + PassMark (overall) (+3012)
- + 3DMark Fire Strike (+11763)
B
GeForce RTX 2070
- + Memory bus (bit) (+64 bit)
- + Tensor cores (+96)
- + Normalized score (+0.9)
Detailed spec comparison
| Spec |
Component A
GeForce RTX 5070
|
Component B
GeForce RTX 2070
|
|---|---|---|
| Release year | 2025 (+7) | 2018 |
| VRAM (GB) | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR6 |
| Memory clock (MHz) | 2000 MHz | — |
| Bandwidth (GB/s) | 672 GB/s (+224 GB/s) | 448 GB/s |
| Memory bus (bit) | 192 bit | 256 bit (+64 bit) |
| TGP / TDP (W) | 100 W (+20 W) | 80 W |
| Lithography (nm) | 4 nm (-8 nm) | 12 nm |
| Transistors (M) | 31,100M (+20,300M) | 10,800M |
| Die size (mm²) | 263 mm² (+182 mm²) | 445 mm² |
| Base clock (MHz) | — | — |
| Boost clock (MHz) | — | — |
| CUDA cores | 6,144 (+3840) | 2,304 |
| TMUs | 192 (+48) | 144 |
| ROPs | 80 (+16) | 64 |
| RT cores | 48 (+12) | 36 |
| Tensor cores | 192 | 288 (+96) |
| FP32 performance (TFLOPS) | 30.87 TFLOPS (+25.41 TFLOPS) | 5.46 TFLOPS |
| Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) | 201.00 GPixel/s (+97.30 GPixel/s) | 103.70 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) | 482.30 GTexel/s (+249.00 GTexel/s) | 233.30 GTexel/s |
| Energy efficiency | 21.3 (+4.3) | 17.0 |
| PassMark (overall) | 19,075 (+3012) | 16,063 |
| 3DMark Time Spy | — | 6,661 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike | 34,949 (+11763) | 23,186 |
| Geekbench OpenCL | — | 88,437 |
| Geekbench Vulkan | — | 83,408 |
| Normalized score | 69.6 | 70.5 (+0.9) |
Only in component A
ReBAR
ray_tracing
In both
CUDA
DLSS
FPS in games (1080p)
| Game | GeForce RTX 5070 | GeForce RTX 2070 | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battlefield 5 | 180 FPS | 92 FPS | +95.7% (A) |
| CS:GO | 240 FPS | 240 FPS | ≈ |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 300 FPS | 150 FPS | +100% (A) |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 170 FPS | 60 FPS | +183.3% (A) |
| Far Cry 5 | 322 FPS | 103 FPS | +212.6% (A) |
| Fortnite | 300 FPS | 122 FPS | +145.9% (A) |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 270 FPS | 121 FPS | +123.1% (A) |
| Forza Horizon 5 | 329 FPS | 85 FPS | +287.1% (A) |
| GTA V | 140 FPS | 140 FPS | ≈ |
| Metro Exodus | 170 FPS | 61 FPS | +178.7% (A) |
| Overwatch | 240 FPS | 240 FPS | ≈ |
| PUBG | 140 FPS | 140 FPS | ≈ |
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 210 FPS | 65 FPS | +223.1% (A) |
| The Witcher 3 | 436 FPS | 122 FPS | +257.4% (A) |
| Valorant | 400 FPS | 180 FPS | +122.2% (A) |
Specs from public sources (PassMark, Geekbench). FPS measured at 1080p medium settings.
Based on the comparison:
GeForce RTX 5070 wins 16 of the comparable criteria.
The choice depends on your use case.
🤔 How to choose
Universal advice for any use case.
- Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
- Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
- Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).