Component comparison
GeForce RTX 5070 vs GeForce RTX 2060
GeForce RTX 5070 vs GeForce RTX 2060 — detailed GPU comparison: performance, gaming FPS, specifications.
Advantages
A
GeForce RTX 5070
- + Release year (+6)
- + VRAM (GB) (+2 GB)
- + Memory clock (MHz) (+250 MHz)
- + Bandwidth (GB/s) (+336 GB/s)
- + Lithography (nm) (-8 nm)
- + Transistors (M) (+20,300M)
- + Die size (mm²) (+182 mm²)
- + CUDA cores (+4224)
- + TMUs (+72)
- + ROPs (+32)
- + RT cores (+18)
- + FP32 performance (TFLOPS) (+24.42 TFLOPS)
- + Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) (+120.36 GPixel/s)
- + Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) (+280.70 GTexel/s)
- + Energy efficiency (+3.2)
- + PassMark (overall) (+4981)
- + 3DMark Fire Strike (+18618)
- + Normalized score (+3.2)
B
GeForce RTX 2060
- + TGP / TDP (W) (+15 W)
- + Tensor cores (+48)
Detailed spec comparison
| Spec |
Component A
GeForce RTX 5070
|
Component B
GeForce RTX 2060
|
|---|---|---|
| Release year | 2025 (+6) | 2019 |
| VRAM (GB) | 8 GB (+2 GB) | 6 GB |
| Memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR6 |
| Memory clock (MHz) | 2000 MHz (+250 MHz) | 1750 MHz |
| Bandwidth (GB/s) | 672 GB/s (+336 GB/s) | 336 GB/s |
| Memory bus (bit) | 192 bit | 192 bit |
| TGP / TDP (W) | 100 W | 115 W (+15 W) |
| Lithography (nm) | 4 nm (-8 nm) | 12 nm |
| Transistors (M) | 31,100M (+20,300M) | 10,800M |
| Die size (mm²) | 263 mm² (+182 mm²) | 445 mm² |
| Base clock (MHz) | — | — |
| Boost clock (MHz) | — | — |
| CUDA cores | 6,144 (+4224) | 1,920 |
| TMUs | 192 (+72) | 120 |
| ROPs | 80 (+32) | 48 |
| RT cores | 48 (+18) | 30 |
| Tensor cores | 192 | 240 (+48) |
| FP32 performance (TFLOPS) | 30.87 TFLOPS (+24.42 TFLOPS) | 6.45 TFLOPS |
| Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) | 201.00 GPixel/s (+120.36 GPixel/s) | 80.64 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) | 482.30 GTexel/s (+280.70 GTexel/s) | 201.60 GTexel/s |
| Energy efficiency | 21.3 (+3.2) | 18.1 |
| PassMark (overall) | 19,075 (+4981) | 14,094 |
| 3DMark Time Spy | — | 6,141 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike | 34,949 (+18618) | 16,331 |
| Geekbench OpenCL | — | 71,412 |
| Geekbench Vulkan | — | 65,858 |
| Normalized score | 69.6 (+3.2) | 66.4 |
Only in component A
ReBAR
In both
CUDA
DLSS
ray_tracing
FPS in games (1080p)
| Game | GeForce RTX 5070 | GeForce RTX 2060 | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battlefield 5 | 180 FPS | 104 FPS | +73.1% (A) |
| CS:GO | 240 FPS | 240 FPS | ≈ |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 300 FPS | 150 FPS | +100% (A) |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 170 FPS | 60 FPS | +183.3% (A) |
| Far Cry 5 | 322 FPS | 96 FPS | +235.4% (A) |
| Fortnite | 300 FPS | 162 FPS | +85.2% (A) |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 270 FPS | 108 FPS | +150% (A) |
| Forza Horizon 5 | 329 FPS | 100 FPS | +229% (A) |
| GTA V | 140 FPS | 140 FPS | ≈ |
| Metro Exodus | 170 FPS | 56 FPS | +203.6% (A) |
| Overwatch | 240 FPS | 240 FPS | ≈ |
| PUBG | 140 FPS | 140 FPS | ≈ |
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 210 FPS | 65 FPS | +223.1% (A) |
| The Witcher 3 | 436 FPS | 111 FPS | +292.8% (A) |
| Valorant | 400 FPS | 223 FPS | +79.4% (A) |
Specs from public sources (PassMark, Geekbench). FPS measured at 1080p medium settings.
Based on the comparison:
GeForce RTX 5070 wins 18 of the comparable criteria.
The choice depends on your use case.
🤔 How to choose
Universal advice for any use case.
- Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
- Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
- Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).