Component comparison

GeForce RTX 5060 vs RTX A500

GeForce RTX 5060 vs RTX A500 — detailed GPU comparison: performance, gaming FPS, specifications.

Advantages

A GeForce RTX 5060
  • + Release year (+4)
  • + VRAM (GB) (+4 GB)
  • + Bandwidth (GB/s) (+336 GB/s)
  • + Memory bus (bit) (+64 bit)
  • + Lithography (nm) (-3 nm)
  • + CUDA cores (+1792)
  • + TMUs (+56)
  • + ROPs (+16)
  • + RT cores (+14)
  • + Tensor cores (+56)
  • + FP32 performance (TFLOPS) (+11.93 TFLOPS)
  • + Energy efficiency (+48.9)
  • + PassMark (overall) (+10211)
  • + Normalized score (+34.5)
B RTX A500
  • + Memory clock (MHz) (+250 MHz)
  • + TGP / TDP (W) (+15 W)

Detailed spec comparison

Spec Component A
GeForce RTX 5060
Component B
RTX A500
Release year 2025 (+4) 2021
VRAM (GB) 8 GB (+4 GB) 4 GB
Memory type GDDR7 GDDR6
Memory clock (MHz) 1500 MHz 1750 MHz (+250 MHz)
Bandwidth (GB/s) 448 GB/s (+336 GB/s) 112 GB/s
Memory bus (bit) 128 bit (+64 bit) 64 bit
TGP / TDP (W) 45 W 60 W (+15 W)
Lithography (nm) 5 nm (-3 nm) 8 nm
Transistors (M) 21,900M —
Die size (mm²) 181 mm² —
Base clock (MHz) — —
Boost clock (MHz) — 1537 MHz
CUDA cores 3,840 (+1792) 2,048
TMUs 120 (+56) 64
ROPs 48 (+16) 32
RT cores 30 (+14) 16
Tensor cores 120 (+56) 64
FP32 performance (TFLOPS) 19.18 TFLOPS (+11.93 TFLOPS) 7.25 TFLOPS
Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) 119.90 GPixel/s —
Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) 299.60 GTexel/s —
Energy efficiency 69.2 (+48.9) 20.2
PassMark (overall) 16,749 (+10211) 6,538
3DMark Time Spy — —
3DMark Fire Strike 31,366 —
Geekbench OpenCL — —
Geekbench Vulkan — —
Normalized score 50.3 (+34.5) 15.8

Only in component A

ray_tracing

In both

CUDA DLSS ReBAR

FPS in games (1080p)

Game GeForce RTX 5060 RTX A500 Delta
CS:GO 240 FPS 240 FPS ≈
GTA V 140 FPS 140 FPS ≈
Overwatch 240 FPS 240 FPS ≈
PUBG 140 FPS 140 FPS ≈

Specs from public sources (PassMark, Geekbench). FPS measured at 1080p medium settings.

Based on the comparison: GeForce RTX 5060 wins 14 of the comparable criteria. The choice depends on your use case.

🤔 How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).