Component comparison

GeForce RTX 5060 vs RTX A1000

GeForce RTX 5060 vs RTX A1000 — detailed GPU comparison: performance, gaming FPS, specifications.

Advantages

A GeForce RTX 5060
  • + Release year (+1)
  • + Bandwidth (GB/s) (+224 GB/s)
  • + Lithography (nm) (-3 nm)
  • + CUDA cores (+1536)
  • + TMUs (+48)
  • + ROPs (+16)
  • + RT cores (+12)
  • + Tensor cores (+48)
  • + FP32 performance (TFLOPS) (+12.44 TFLOPS)
  • + Energy efficiency (+29.3)
  • + PassMark (overall) (+5996)
B RTX A1000
  • + TGP / TDP (W) (+5 W)
  • + Normalized score (+6.9)

Detailed spec comparison

Spec Component A
GeForce RTX 5060
Component B
RTX A1000
Release year 2025 (+1) 2024
VRAM (GB) 8 GB 8 GB
Memory type GDDR7 GDDR6
Memory clock (MHz) 1500 MHz 1500 MHz
Bandwidth (GB/s) 448 GB/s (+224 GB/s) 224 GB/s
Memory bus (bit) 128 bit 128 bit
TGP / TDP (W) 45 W 50 W (+5 W)
Lithography (nm) 5 nm (-3 nm) 8 nm
Transistors (M) 21,900M —
Die size (mm²) 181 mm² —
Base clock (MHz) — —
Boost clock (MHz) — —
CUDA cores 3,840 (+1536) 2,304
TMUs 120 (+48) 72
ROPs 48 (+16) 32
RT cores 30 (+12) 18
Tensor cores 120 (+48) 72
FP32 performance (TFLOPS) 19.18 TFLOPS (+12.44 TFLOPS) 6.74 TFLOPS
Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) 119.90 GPixel/s —
Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) 299.60 GTexel/s —
Energy efficiency 69.2 (+29.3) 39.9
PassMark (overall) 16,749 (+5996) 10,753
3DMark Time Spy — —
3DMark Fire Strike 31,366 —
Geekbench OpenCL — 53,644
Geekbench Vulkan — 50,444
Normalized score 50.3 57.2 (+6.9)

Only in component A

ray_tracing

In both

CUDA DLSS ReBAR

FPS in games (1080p)

Game GeForce RTX 5060 RTX A1000 Delta
CS:GO 240 FPS 240 FPS ≈
GTA V 140 FPS 140 FPS ≈
Overwatch 240 FPS 240 FPS ≈
PUBG 140 FPS 140 FPS ≈

Specs from public sources (PassMark, Geekbench). FPS measured at 1080p medium settings.

Based on the comparison: GeForce RTX 5060 wins 11 of the comparable criteria. The choice depends on your use case.

🤔 How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).