Component comparison

GeForce RTX 5060 vs Quadro T1000

GeForce RTX 5060 vs Quadro T1000 — detailed GPU comparison: performance, gaming FPS, specifications.

Advantages

A GeForce RTX 5060
  • + Release year (+6)
  • + VRAM (GB) (+4 GB)
  • + Lithography (nm) (-7 nm)
  • + CUDA cores (+3072)
  • + Energy efficiency (+45.0)
  • + PassMark (overall) (+10236)
  • + Normalized score (+4.4)
B Quadro T1000
  • + Memory clock (MHz) (+6500 MHz)
  • + TGP / TDP (W) (+5 W)

Detailed spec comparison

Spec Component A
GeForce RTX 5060
Component B
Quadro T1000
Release year 2025 (+6) 2019
VRAM (GB) 8 GB (+4 GB) 4 GB
Memory type GDDR7 GDDR5
Memory clock (MHz) 1500 MHz 8000 MHz (+6500 MHz)
Bandwidth (GB/s) 448 GB/s —
Memory bus (bit) 128 bit 128 bit
TGP / TDP (W) 45 W 50 W (+5 W)
Lithography (nm) 5 nm (-7 nm) 12 nm
Transistors (M) 21,900M —
Die size (mm²) 181 mm² —
Base clock (MHz) — —
Boost clock (MHz) — 1455 MHz
CUDA cores 3,840 (+3072) 768
TMUs 120 —
ROPs 48 —
RT cores 30 —
Tensor cores 120 —
FP32 performance (TFLOPS) 19.18 TFLOPS —
Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) 119.90 GPixel/s —
Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) 299.60 GTexel/s —
Energy efficiency 69.2 (+45.0) 24.1
PassMark (overall) 16,749 (+10236) 6,513
3DMark Time Spy — —
3DMark Fire Strike 31,366 —
Geekbench OpenCL — 33,850
Geekbench Vulkan — 29,725
Normalized score 50.3 (+4.4) 45.9

Only in component A

DLSS ReBAR ray_tracing

In both

CUDA

FPS in games (1080p)

Game GeForce RTX 5060 Quadro T1000 Delta
Battlefield 5 130 FPS 38 FPS +242.1% (A)
CS:GO 240 FPS 240 FPS ≈
Escape from Tarkov 120 FPS 68 FPS +76.5% (A)
Far Cry 5 130 FPS 57 FPS +128.1% (A)
GTA V 140 FPS 140 FPS ≈
Metro Exodus 95 FPS 32 FPS +196.9% (A)
Overwatch 240 FPS 240 FPS ≈
PUBG 140 FPS 140 FPS ≈

Specs from public sources (PassMark, Geekbench). FPS measured at 1080p medium settings.

Based on the comparison: GeForce RTX 5060 wins 7 of the comparable criteria. The choice depends on your use case.

🤔 How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).