Component comparison
GeForce RTX 5060 vs GeForce RTX 2070
GeForce RTX 5060 vs GeForce RTX 2070 — detailed GPU comparison: performance, gaming FPS, specifications.
Advantages
A
GeForce RTX 5060
- + Release year (+7)
- + Lithography (nm) (-7 nm)
- + Transistors (M) (+11,100M)
- + Die size (mm²) (+264 mm²)
- + CUDA cores (+1536)
- + FP32 performance (TFLOPS) (+13.72 TFLOPS)
- + Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) (+16.20 GPixel/s)
- + Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) (+66.30 GTexel/s)
- + Energy efficiency (+52.1)
- + PassMark (overall) (+686)
- + 3DMark Fire Strike (+8180)
B
GeForce RTX 2070
- + Memory bus (bit) (+128 bit)
- + TGP / TDP (W) (+35 W)
- + TMUs (+24)
- + ROPs (+16)
- + RT cores (+6)
- + Tensor cores (+168)
- + Normalized score (+20.2)
Detailed spec comparison
| Spec |
Component A
GeForce RTX 5060
|
Component B
GeForce RTX 2070
|
|---|---|---|
| Release year | 2025 (+7) | 2018 |
| VRAM (GB) | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR6 |
| Memory clock (MHz) | 1500 MHz | — |
| Bandwidth (GB/s) | 448 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
| Memory bus (bit) | 128 bit | 256 bit (+128 bit) |
| TGP / TDP (W) | 45 W | 80 W (+35 W) |
| Lithography (nm) | 5 nm (-7 nm) | 12 nm |
| Transistors (M) | 21,900M (+11,100M) | 10,800M |
| Die size (mm²) | 181 mm² (+264 mm²) | 445 mm² |
| Base clock (MHz) | — | — |
| Boost clock (MHz) | — | — |
| CUDA cores | 3,840 (+1536) | 2,304 |
| TMUs | 120 | 144 (+24) |
| ROPs | 48 | 64 (+16) |
| RT cores | 30 | 36 (+6) |
| Tensor cores | 120 | 288 (+168) |
| FP32 performance (TFLOPS) | 19.18 TFLOPS (+13.72 TFLOPS) | 5.46 TFLOPS |
| Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) | 119.90 GPixel/s (+16.20 GPixel/s) | 103.70 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) | 299.60 GTexel/s (+66.30 GTexel/s) | 233.30 GTexel/s |
| Energy efficiency | 69.2 (+52.1) | 17.0 |
| PassMark (overall) | 16,749 (+686) | 16,063 |
| 3DMark Time Spy | — | 6,661 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike | 31,366 (+8180) | 23,186 |
| Geekbench OpenCL | — | 88,437 |
| Geekbench Vulkan | — | 83,408 |
| Normalized score | 50.3 | 70.5 (+20.2) |
Only in component A
ReBAR
ray_tracing
In both
CUDA
DLSS
FPS in games (1080p)
| Game | GeForce RTX 5060 | GeForce RTX 2070 | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battlefield 5 | 130 FPS | 92 FPS | +41.3% (A) |
| CS:GO | 240 FPS | 240 FPS | ≈ |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 220 FPS | 150 FPS | +46.7% (A) |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 95 FPS | 60 FPS | +58.3% (A) |
| Escape from Tarkov | 120 FPS | 119 FPS | +0.8% (A) |
| Far Cry 5 | 130 FPS | 103 FPS | +26.2% (A) |
| Fortnite | 170 FPS | 122 FPS | +39.3% (A) |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 150 FPS | 121 FPS | +24% (A) |
| Forza Horizon 5 | 255 FPS | 85 FPS | +200% (A) |
| GTA V | 140 FPS | 140 FPS | ≈ |
| Metro Exodus | 95 FPS | 61 FPS | +55.7% (A) |
| Overwatch | 240 FPS | 240 FPS | ≈ |
| PUBG | 140 FPS | 140 FPS | ≈ |
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 110 FPS | 65 FPS | +69.2% (A) |
| The Witcher 3 | 140 FPS | 122 FPS | +14.8% (A) |
| Valorant | 230 FPS | 180 FPS | +27.8% (A) |
Specs from public sources (PassMark, Geekbench). FPS measured at 1080p medium settings.
Based on the comparison:
GeForce RTX 5060 wins 11 of the comparable criteria.
The choice depends on your use case.
🤔 How to choose
Universal advice for any use case.
- Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
- Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
- Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).