Component comparison
GeForce RTX 5060 vs GeForce RTX 2060
GeForce RTX 5060 vs GeForce RTX 2060 — detailed GPU comparison: performance, gaming FPS, specifications.
Advantages
A
GeForce RTX 5060
- + Release year (+6)
- + VRAM (GB) (+2 GB)
- + Bandwidth (GB/s) (+112 GB/s)
- + Lithography (nm) (-7 nm)
- + Transistors (M) (+11,100M)
- + Die size (mm²) (+264 mm²)
- + CUDA cores (+1920)
- + FP32 performance (TFLOPS) (+12.73 TFLOPS)
- + Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) (+39.26 GPixel/s)
- + Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) (+98.00 GTexel/s)
- + Energy efficiency (+51.0)
- + PassMark (overall) (+2655)
- + 3DMark Fire Strike (+15035)
B
GeForce RTX 2060
- + Memory clock (MHz) (+250 MHz)
- + Memory bus (bit) (+64 bit)
- + TGP / TDP (W) (+70 W)
- + Tensor cores (+120)
- + Normalized score (+16.1)
Detailed spec comparison
| Spec |
Component A
GeForce RTX 5060
|
Component B
GeForce RTX 2060
|
|---|---|---|
| Release year | 2025 (+6) | 2019 |
| VRAM (GB) | 8 GB (+2 GB) | 6 GB |
| Memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR6 |
| Memory clock (MHz) | 1500 MHz | 1750 MHz (+250 MHz) |
| Bandwidth (GB/s) | 448 GB/s (+112 GB/s) | 336 GB/s |
| Memory bus (bit) | 128 bit | 192 bit (+64 bit) |
| TGP / TDP (W) | 45 W | 115 W (+70 W) |
| Lithography (nm) | 5 nm (-7 nm) | 12 nm |
| Transistors (M) | 21,900M (+11,100M) | 10,800M |
| Die size (mm²) | 181 mm² (+264 mm²) | 445 mm² |
| Base clock (MHz) | — | — |
| Boost clock (MHz) | — | — |
| CUDA cores | 3,840 (+1920) | 1,920 |
| TMUs | 120 | 120 |
| ROPs | 48 | 48 |
| RT cores | 30 | 30 |
| Tensor cores | 120 | 240 (+120) |
| FP32 performance (TFLOPS) | 19.18 TFLOPS (+12.73 TFLOPS) | 6.45 TFLOPS |
| Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) | 119.90 GPixel/s (+39.26 GPixel/s) | 80.64 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) | 299.60 GTexel/s (+98.00 GTexel/s) | 201.60 GTexel/s |
| Energy efficiency | 69.2 (+51.0) | 18.1 |
| PassMark (overall) | 16,749 (+2655) | 14,094 |
| 3DMark Time Spy | — | 6,141 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike | 31,366 (+15035) | 16,331 |
| Geekbench OpenCL | — | 71,412 |
| Geekbench Vulkan | — | 65,858 |
| Normalized score | 50.3 | 66.4 (+16.1) |
Only in component A
ReBAR
In both
CUDA
DLSS
ray_tracing
FPS in games (1080p)
| Game | GeForce RTX 5060 | GeForce RTX 2060 | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battlefield 5 | 130 FPS | 104 FPS | +25% (A) |
| CS:GO | 240 FPS | 240 FPS | ≈ |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 220 FPS | 150 FPS | +46.7% (A) |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 95 FPS | 60 FPS | +58.3% (A) |
| Escape from Tarkov | 120 FPS | 121 FPS | 0.8% (B) |
| Far Cry 5 | 130 FPS | 96 FPS | +35.4% (A) |
| Fortnite | 170 FPS | 162 FPS | +4.9% (A) |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 150 FPS | 108 FPS | +38.9% (A) |
| Forza Horizon 5 | 255 FPS | 100 FPS | +155% (A) |
| GTA V | 140 FPS | 140 FPS | ≈ |
| Metro Exodus | 95 FPS | 56 FPS | +69.6% (A) |
| Overwatch | 240 FPS | 240 FPS | ≈ |
| PUBG | 140 FPS | 140 FPS | ≈ |
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 110 FPS | 65 FPS | +69.2% (A) |
| The Witcher 3 | 140 FPS | 111 FPS | +26.1% (A) |
| Valorant | 230 FPS | 223 FPS | +3.1% (A) |
Specs from public sources (PassMark, Geekbench). FPS measured at 1080p medium settings.
Based on the comparison:
GeForce RTX 5060 wins 13 of the comparable criteria.
The choice depends on your use case.
🤔 How to choose
Universal advice for any use case.
- Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
- Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
- Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).