Component comparison
GeForce RTX 5060 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
GeForce RTX 5060 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti — detailed GPU comparison: performance, gaming FPS, specifications.
Advantages
A
GeForce RTX 5060
- + Release year (+9)
- + VRAM (GB) (+4 GB)
- + Bandwidth (GB/s) (+336 GB/s)
- + Lithography (nm) (-9 nm)
- + Transistors (M) (+18,600M)
- + CUDA cores (+3072)
- + TMUs (+72)
- + ROPs (+16)
- + FP32 performance (TFLOPS) (+17.00 TFLOPS)
- + Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) (+75.36 GPixel/s)
- + Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) (+232.78 GTexel/s)
- + Energy efficiency (+53.4)
- + PassMark (overall) (+10386)
- + 3DMark Fire Strike (+23881)
- + Normalized score (+9.5)
B
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
- + TGP / TDP (W) (+30 W)
- + Die size (mm²) (+49 mm²)
Detailed spec comparison
| Spec |
Component A
GeForce RTX 5060
|
Component B
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
|
|---|---|---|
| Release year | 2025 (+9) | 2016 |
| VRAM (GB) | 8 GB (+4 GB) | 4 GB |
| Memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR5 |
| Memory clock (MHz) | 1500 MHz | — |
| Bandwidth (GB/s) | 448 GB/s (+336 GB/s) | 112 GB/s |
| Memory bus (bit) | 128 bit | 128 bit |
| TGP / TDP (W) | 45 W | 75 W (+30 W) |
| Lithography (nm) | 5 nm (-9 nm) | 14 nm |
| Transistors (M) | 21,900M (+18,600M) | 3,300M |
| Die size (mm²) | 181 mm² | 132 mm² (+49 mm²) |
| Base clock (MHz) | — | — |
| Boost clock (MHz) | — | — |
| CUDA cores | 3,840 (+3072) | 768 |
| TMUs | 120 (+72) | 48 |
| ROPs | 48 (+16) | 32 |
| RT cores | 30 | — |
| Tensor cores | 120 | — |
| FP32 performance (TFLOPS) | 19.18 TFLOPS (+17.00 TFLOPS) | 2.18 TFLOPS |
| Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) | 119.90 GPixel/s (+75.36 GPixel/s) | 44.54 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) | 299.60 GTexel/s (+232.78 GTexel/s) | 66.82 GTexel/s |
| Energy efficiency | 69.2 (+53.4) | 15.8 |
| PassMark (overall) | 16,749 (+10386) | 6,363 |
| 3DMark Time Spy | — | 2,261 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike | 31,366 (+23881) | 7,485 |
| Geekbench OpenCL | — | 20,654 |
| Geekbench Vulkan | — | 19,790 |
| Normalized score | 50.3 (+9.5) | 40.8 |
Only in component A
DLSS
ReBAR
ray_tracing
In both
CUDA
FPS in games (1080p)
| Game | GeForce RTX 5060 | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battlefield 5 | 130 FPS | 57 FPS | +128.1% (A) |
| CS:GO | 240 FPS | 240 FPS | ≈ |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 220 FPS | 70 FPS | +214.3% (A) |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 95 FPS | 27 FPS | +251.9% (A) |
| Escape from Tarkov | 120 FPS | 45 FPS | +166.7% (A) |
| Far Cry 5 | 130 FPS | 48 FPS | +170.8% (A) |
| Fortnite | 170 FPS | 75 FPS | +126.7% (A) |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 150 FPS | 67 FPS | +123.9% (A) |
| Forza Horizon 5 | 255 FPS | 40 FPS | +537.5% (A) |
| GTA V | 140 FPS | 140 FPS | ≈ |
| Metro Exodus | 95 FPS | 31 FPS | +206.5% (A) |
| Overwatch | 240 FPS | 240 FPS | ≈ |
| PUBG | 140 FPS | 140 FPS | ≈ |
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 110 FPS | 24 FPS | +358.3% (A) |
| The Witcher 3 | 140 FPS | 46 FPS | +204.3% (A) |
| Valorant | 230 FPS | 110 FPS | +109.1% (A) |
Specs from public sources (PassMark, Geekbench). FPS measured at 1080p medium settings.
Based on the comparison:
GeForce RTX 5060 wins 15 of the comparable criteria.
The choice depends on your use case.
🤔 How to choose
Universal advice for any use case.
- Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
- Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
- Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).