Component comparison
GeForce RTX 5050 vs Quadro T1000
GeForce RTX 5050 vs Quadro T1000 — detailed GPU comparison: performance, gaming FPS, specifications.
Advantages
A
GeForce RTX 5050
- + Release year (+6)
- + VRAM (GB) (+4 GB)
- + TGP / TDP (W) (+65 W)
- + Lithography (nm) (-9 nm)
- + CUDA cores (+1792)
- + Energy efficiency (+0.1)
- + PassMark (overall) (+7554)
B
Quadro T1000
- + Normalized score (+4.6)
Detailed spec comparison
| Spec |
Component A
GeForce RTX 5050
|
Component B
Quadro T1000
|
|---|---|---|
| Release year | 2025 (+6) | 2019 |
| VRAM (GB) | 8 GB (+4 GB) | 4 GB |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory clock (MHz) | — | 8000 MHz |
| Bandwidth (GB/s) | 320 GB/s | — |
| Memory bus (bit) | 128 bit | 128 bit |
| TGP / TDP (W) | 115 W (+65 W) | 50 W |
| Lithography (nm) | 3 nm (-9 nm) | 12 nm |
| Transistors (M) | 16,900M | — |
| Die size (mm²) | 149 mm² | — |
| Base clock (MHz) | — | — |
| Boost clock (MHz) | — | 1455 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 2,560 (+1792) | 768 |
| TMUs | 80 | — |
| ROPs | 32 | — |
| RT cores | 20 | — |
| Tensor cores | 80 | — |
| FP32 performance (TFLOPS) | 13.17 TFLOPS | — |
| Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) | 82.30 GPixel/s | — |
| Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) | 205.80 GTexel/s | — |
| Energy efficiency | 24.3 (+0.1) | 24.1 |
| PassMark (overall) | 14,067 (+7554) | 6,513 |
| 3DMark Time Spy | — | — |
| 3DMark Fire Strike | — | — |
| Geekbench OpenCL | — | 33,850 |
| Geekbench Vulkan | — | 29,725 |
| Normalized score | 41.3 | 45.9 (+4.6) |
Only in component A
DLSS
ReBAR
ray_tracing
In both
CUDA
FPS in games (1080p)
| Game | GeForce RTX 5050 | Quadro T1000 | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| CS:GO | 240 FPS | 240 FPS | ≈ |
| GTA V | 140 FPS | 140 FPS | ≈ |
| Overwatch | 240 FPS | 240 FPS | ≈ |
| PUBG | 140 FPS | 140 FPS | ≈ |
Specs from public sources (PassMark, Geekbench). FPS measured at 1080p medium settings.
Based on the comparison:
GeForce RTX 5050 wins 7 of the comparable criteria.
The choice depends on your use case.
🤔 How to choose
Universal advice for any use case.
- Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
- Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
- Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).