Component comparison

GeForce RTX 5050 vs GeForce MX450

GeForce RTX 5050 vs GeForce MX450 — detailed GPU comparison: performance, gaming FPS, specifications.

Advantages

A GeForce RTX 5050
  • + Release year (+5)
  • + VRAM (GB) (+6 GB)
  • + Bandwidth (GB/s) (+240 GB/s)
  • + Memory bus (bit) (+64 bit)
  • + TGP / TDP (W) (+90 W)
  • + Lithography (nm) (-9 nm)
  • + Transistors (M) (+12,200M)
  • + Die size (mm²) (+51 mm²)
  • + CUDA cores (+1664)
  • + TMUs (+16)
  • + FP32 performance (TFLOPS) (+9.94 TFLOPS)
  • + Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) (+31.90 GPixel/s)
  • + Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) (+117.60 GTexel/s)
  • + PassMark (overall) (+10353)
B GeForce MX450
  • + Energy efficiency (+3.3)
  • + Normalized score (+3.4)

Detailed spec comparison

Spec Component A
GeForce RTX 5050
Component B
GeForce MX450
Release year 2025 (+5) 2020
VRAM (GB) 8 GB (+6 GB) 2 GB
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR5, GDDR6
Memory clock (MHz) — 1250 MHz
Bandwidth (GB/s) 320 GB/s (+240 GB/s) 80 GB/s
Memory bus (bit) 128 bit (+64 bit) 64 bit
TGP / TDP (W) 115 W (+90 W) 25 W
Lithography (nm) 3 nm (-9 nm) 12 nm
Transistors (M) 16,900M (+12,200M) 4,700M
Die size (mm²) 149 mm² (+51 mm²) 200 mm²
Base clock (MHz) — 1395 MHz
Boost clock (MHz) — 1575 MHz
CUDA cores 2,560 (+1664) 896
TMUs 80 (+16) 64
ROPs 32 32
RT cores 20 —
Tensor cores 80 —
FP32 performance (TFLOPS) 13.17 TFLOPS (+9.94 TFLOPS) 3.23 TFLOPS
Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) 82.30 GPixel/s (+31.90 GPixel/s) 50.40 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) 205.80 GTexel/s (+117.60 GTexel/s) 88.20 GTexel/s
Energy efficiency 24.3 27.6 (+3.3)
PassMark (overall) 14,067 (+10353) 3,714
3DMark Time Spy — 1,900
3DMark Fire Strike — 4,725
Geekbench OpenCL — 28,541
Geekbench Vulkan — 27,321
Normalized score 41.3 44.7 (+3.4)

Only in component A

DLSS ReBAR ray_tracing

In both

CUDA

FPS in games (1080p)

Game GeForce RTX 5050 GeForce MX450 Delta
CS:GO 240 FPS 240 FPS ≈
GTA V 140 FPS 140 FPS ≈
Overwatch 240 FPS 240 FPS ≈
PUBG 140 FPS 140 FPS ≈

Specs from public sources (PassMark, Geekbench). FPS measured at 1080p medium settings.

Based on the comparison: GeForce RTX 5050 wins 14 of the comparable criteria. The choice depends on your use case.

🤔 How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).