Component comparison

GeForce RTX 5050 vs GeForce 940M

GeForce RTX 5050 vs GeForce 940M — detailed GPU comparison: performance, gaming FPS, specifications.

Advantages

A GeForce RTX 5050
  • + Release year (+10)
  • + VRAM (GB) (+6 GB)
  • + Bandwidth (GB/s) (+306 GB/s)
  • + Memory bus (bit) (+64 bit)
  • + TGP / TDP (W) (+40 W)
  • + Lithography (nm) (-25 nm)
  • + Transistors (M) (+15,030M)
  • + CUDA cores (+2176)
  • + TMUs (+56)
  • + ROPs (+24)
  • + FP32 performance (TFLOPS) (+12.27 TFLOPS)
  • + Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) (+64.73 GPixel/s)
  • + Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) (+170.66 GTexel/s)
  • + Energy efficiency (+17.9)
  • + PassMark (overall) (+12934)
  • + Normalized score (+35.1)
B GeForce 940M
  • + Die size (mm²) (+1 mm²)

Detailed spec comparison

Spec Component A
GeForce RTX 5050
Component B
GeForce 940M
Release year 2025 (+10) 2015
VRAM (GB) 8 GB (+6 GB) 2 GB
Memory type GDDR6 DDR3
Memory clock (MHz) — 900 MHz
Bandwidth (GB/s) 320 GB/s (+306 GB/s) 14 GB/s
Memory bus (bit) 128 bit (+64 bit) 64 bit
TGP / TDP (W) 115 W (+40 W) 75 W
Lithography (nm) 3 nm (-25 nm) 28 nm
Transistors (M) 16,900M (+15,030M) 1,870M
Die size (mm²) 149 mm² 148 mm² (+1 mm²)
Base clock (MHz) — 1020 MHz
Boost clock (MHz) — 1098 MHz
CUDA cores 2,560 (+2176) 384
TMUs 80 (+56) 24
ROPs 32 (+24) 8
RT cores 20 —
Tensor cores 80 —
FP32 performance (TFLOPS) 13.17 TFLOPS (+12.27 TFLOPS) 0.90 TFLOPS
Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) 82.30 GPixel/s (+64.73 GPixel/s) 17.57 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) 205.80 GTexel/s (+170.66 GTexel/s) 35.14 GTexel/s
Energy efficiency 24.3 (+17.9) 6.4
PassMark (overall) 14,067 (+12934) 1,133
3DMark Time Spy — —
3DMark Fire Strike — 1,622
Geekbench OpenCL — 6,025
Geekbench Vulkan — 4,549
Normalized score 41.3 (+35.1) 6.2

Only in component A

DLSS ReBAR ray_tracing

In both

CUDA

FPS in games (1080p)

Game GeForce RTX 5050 GeForce 940M Delta
CS:GO 240 FPS 240 FPS ≈
GTA V 140 FPS 140 FPS ≈
Overwatch 240 FPS 240 FPS ≈
PUBG 140 FPS 140 FPS ≈

Specs from public sources (PassMark, Geekbench). FPS measured at 1080p medium settings.

Based on the comparison: GeForce RTX 5050 wins 16 of the comparable criteria. The choice depends on your use case.

🤔 How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).