Component comparison
GeForce RTX 4090 vs Quadro T1000
GeForce RTX 4090 vs Quadro T1000 — detailed GPU comparison: performance, gaming FPS, specifications.
Advantages
A
GeForce RTX 4090
- + Release year (+4)
- + VRAM (GB) (+12 GB)
- + Memory bus (bit) (+256 bit)
- + TGP / TDP (W) (+70 W)
- + Lithography (nm) (-8 nm)
- + CUDA cores (+15616)
- + Energy efficiency (+17.7)
- + PassMark (overall) (+20534)
- + Normalized score (+29.1)
B
Quadro T1000
- + Memory clock (MHz) (+5750 MHz)
Detailed spec comparison
| Spec |
Component A
GeForce RTX 4090
|
Component B
Quadro T1000
|
|---|---|---|
| Release year | 2023 (+4) | 2019 |
| VRAM (GB) | 16 GB (+12 GB) | 4 GB |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory clock (MHz) | 2250 MHz | 8000 MHz (+5750 MHz) |
| Bandwidth (GB/s) | 1034 GB/s | — |
| Memory bus (bit) | 384 bit (+256 bit) | 128 bit |
| TGP / TDP (W) | 120 W (+70 W) | 50 W |
| Lithography (nm) | 4 nm (-8 nm) | 12 nm |
| Transistors (M) | 76,300M | — |
| Die size (mm²) | 609 mm² | — |
| Base clock (MHz) | — | — |
| Boost clock (MHz) | — | 1455 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 16,384 (+15616) | 768 |
| TMUs | 512 | — |
| ROPs | 176 | — |
| RT cores | 128 | — |
| Tensor cores | 512 | — |
| FP32 performance (TFLOPS) | 82.58 TFLOPS | — |
| Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) | 443.50 GPixel/s | — |
| Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) | 1290.00 GTexel/s | — |
| Energy efficiency | 41.9 (+17.7) | 24.1 |
| PassMark (overall) | 27,047 (+20534) | 6,513 |
| 3DMark Time Spy | 21,251 | — |
| 3DMark Fire Strike | 46,191 | — |
| Geekbench OpenCL | — | 33,850 |
| Geekbench Vulkan | — | 29,725 |
| Normalized score | 75.0 (+29.1) | 45.9 |
Only in component A
DLSS
ReBAR
ray_tracing
In both
CUDA
FPS in games (1080p)
| Game | GeForce RTX 4090 | Quadro T1000 | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battlefield 5 | 170 FPS | 38 FPS | +347.4% (A) |
| Borderlands 3 | 162 FPS | 38 FPS | +326.3% (A) |
| CS:GO | 240 FPS | 240 FPS | ≈ |
| Control | 184 FPS | 31 FPS | +493.5% (A) |
| Dota 2 | 199 FPS | 113 FPS | +76.1% (A) |
| Escape from Tarkov | 120 FPS | 68 FPS | +76.5% (A) |
| Far Cry 5 | 173 FPS | 57 FPS | +203.5% (A) |
| Far Cry New Dawn | 145 FPS | 46 FPS | +215.2% (A) |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | 122 FPS | 31 FPS | +293.5% (A) |
| GTA V | 140 FPS | 140 FPS | ≈ |
| GTA V | 154 FPS | 94 FPS | +63.8% (A) |
| Hunt Showdown | 262 FPS | 44 FPS | +495.5% (A) |
| Metro Exodus | 156 FPS | 32 FPS | +387.5% (A) |
| Overwatch | 240 FPS | 240 FPS | ≈ |
| PUBG | 140 FPS | 140 FPS | ≈ |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 243 FPS | 40 FPS | +507.5% (A) |
| The Witcher 3 | 290 FPS | 53 FPS | +447.2% (A) |
| X-Plane 11.11 | 78 FPS | 57 FPS | +36.8% (A) |
Specs from public sources (PassMark, Geekbench). FPS measured at 1080p medium settings.
Based on the comparison:
GeForce RTX 4090 wins 9 of the comparable criteria.
The choice depends on your use case.
🤔 How to choose
Universal advice for any use case.
- Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
- Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
- Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).