Component comparison
GeForce RTX 4090 vs GeForce MX350
GeForce RTX 4090 vs GeForce MX350 — detailed GPU comparison: performance, gaming FPS, specifications.
Advantages
A
GeForce RTX 4090
- + Release year (+3)
- + VRAM (GB) (+14 GB)
- + Memory clock (MHz) (+498 MHz)
- + Bandwidth (GB/s) (+978 GB/s)
- + Memory bus (bit) (+320 bit)
- + TGP / TDP (W) (+100 W)
- + Lithography (nm) (-10 nm)
- + Transistors (M) (+73,000M)
- + CUDA cores (+15744)
- + TMUs (+480)
- + ROPs (+160)
- + FP32 performance (TFLOPS) (+81.38 TFLOPS)
- + Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) (+420.01 GPixel/s)
- + Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) (+1243.02 GTexel/s)
- + Energy efficiency (+15.7)
- + PassMark (overall) (+24229)
- + 3DMark Time Spy (+19915)
- + 3DMark Fire Strike (+41820)
- + Normalized score (+44.2)
B
GeForce MX350
- + Die size (mm²) (+477 mm²)
Detailed spec comparison
| Spec |
Component A
GeForce RTX 4090
|
Component B
GeForce MX350
|
|---|---|---|
| Release year | 2023 (+3) | 2020 |
| VRAM (GB) | 16 GB (+14 GB) | 2 GB |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory clock (MHz) | 2250 MHz (+498 MHz) | 1752 MHz |
| Bandwidth (GB/s) | 1034 GB/s (+978 GB/s) | 56 GB/s |
| Memory bus (bit) | 384 bit (+320 bit) | 64 bit |
| TGP / TDP (W) | 120 W (+100 W) | 20 W |
| Lithography (nm) | 4 nm (-10 nm) | 14 nm |
| Transistors (M) | 76,300M (+73,000M) | 3,300M |
| Die size (mm²) | 609 mm² | 132 mm² (+477 mm²) |
| Base clock (MHz) | — | 1354 MHz |
| Boost clock (MHz) | — | 1468 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 16,384 (+15744) | 640 |
| TMUs | 512 (+480) | 32 |
| ROPs | 176 (+160) | 16 |
| RT cores | 128 | — |
| Tensor cores | 512 | — |
| FP32 performance (TFLOPS) | 82.58 TFLOPS (+81.38 TFLOPS) | 1.20 TFLOPS |
| Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) | 443.50 GPixel/s (+420.01 GPixel/s) | 23.49 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) | 1290.00 GTexel/s (+1243.02 GTexel/s) | 46.98 GTexel/s |
| Energy efficiency | 41.9 (+15.7) | 26.1 |
| PassMark (overall) | 27,047 (+24229) | 2,818 |
| 3DMark Time Spy | 21,251 (+19915) | 1,336 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike | 46,191 (+41820) | 4,371 |
| Geekbench OpenCL | — | 13,112 |
| Geekbench Vulkan | — | 13,369 |
| Normalized score | 75.0 (+44.2) | 30.8 |
Only in component A
DLSS
ReBAR
ray_tracing
In both
CUDA
FPS in games (1080p)
| Game | GeForce RTX 4090 | GeForce MX350 | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Plague Tale Requiem | 87 FPS | 8 FPS | +987.5% (A) |
| Armored Core 6 | 109 FPS | 10 FPS | +990% (A) |
| Assassin´s Creed Valhalla | 144 FPS | 6 FPS | +2300% (A) |
| Atomic Heart | 144 FPS | 7 FPS | +1957.1% (A) |
| Back 4 Blood | 309 FPS | 29 FPS | +965.5% (A) |
| Baldur's Gate 3 | 123 FPS | 11 FPS | +1018.2% (A) |
| Battlefield 5 | 170 FPS | 37 FPS | +359.5% (A) |
| Borderlands 3 | 162 FPS | 17 FPS | +852.9% (A) |
| CS:GO | 240 FPS | 240 FPS | ≈ |
| Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 2022 | 147 FPS | 14 FPS | +950% (A) |
| Control | 184 FPS | 12 FPS | +1433.3% (A) |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 300 FPS | 66 FPS | +354.5% (A) |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 219 FPS | 31 FPS | +606.5% (A) |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 147 FPS | 16 FPS | +818.8% (A) |
| Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 | 98 FPS | 6 FPS | +1533.3% (A) |
| Dead Island 2 | 190 FPS | 21 FPS | +804.8% (A) |
| Death Stranding | 167 FPS | 17 FPS | +882.4% (A) |
| Diablo 4 | 361 FPS | 27 FPS | +1237% (A) |
| Dota 2 | 199 FPS | 83 FPS | +139.8% (A) |
| Elden Ring | 60 FPS | 15 FPS | +300% (A) |
| Escape from Tarkov | 120 FPS | 32 FPS | +275% (A) |
| F1 2020 | 344 FPS | 33 FPS | +942.4% (A) |
| F1 2021 | 276 FPS | 31 FPS | +790.3% (A) |
| F1 22 | 199 FPS | 20 FPS | +895% (A) |
| F1 23 | 152 FPS | 14 FPS | +985.7% (A) |
| Far Cry 5 | 173 FPS | 27 FPS | +540.7% (A) |
| Far Cry 6 | 103 FPS | 11 FPS | +836.4% (A) |
| Far Cry New Dawn | 145 FPS | 25 FPS | +480% (A) |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | 122 FPS | 11 FPS | +1009.1% (A) |
| Fortnite | 300 FPS | 82 FPS | +265.9% (A) |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 250 FPS | 37 FPS | +575.7% (A) |
| Forza Horizon 5 | 281 FPS | 25 FPS | +1024% (A) |
| GRID Legends | 190 FPS | 25 FPS | +660% (A) |
| GTA V | 140 FPS | 140 FPS | ≈ |
| GTA V | 154 FPS | 46 FPS | +234.8% (A) |
| Ghostwire Tokyo | 234 FPS | 15 FPS | +1460% (A) |
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 174 FPS | 12 FPS | +1350% (A) |
| Hunt Showdown | 262 FPS | 21 FPS | +1147.6% (A) |
| Lies of P | 208 FPS | 19 FPS | +994.7% (A) |
| Mafia Definitive Edition | 179 FPS | 19 FPS | +842.1% (A) |
| Metro Exodus | 156 FPS | 12 FPS | +1200% (A) |
| Overwatch | 240 FPS | 240 FPS | ≈ |
| PUBG | 140 FPS | 140 FPS | ≈ |
| Rainbow Six Extraction | 346 FPS | 18 FPS | +1822.2% (A) |
| Ready or Not | 158 FPS | 32 FPS | +393.8% (A) |
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 218 FPS | 18 FPS | +1111.1% (A) |
| Riders Republic | 185 FPS | 15 FPS | +1133.3% (A) |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 243 FPS | 25 FPS | +872% (A) |
| Sons of the Forest | 88 FPS | 13 FPS | +576.9% (A) |
| The Callisto Protocol | 116 FPS | 10 FPS | +1060% (A) |
| The Finals | 175 FPS | 17 FPS | +929.4% (A) |
| The Quarry | 177 FPS | 11 FPS | +1509.1% (A) |
| The Witcher 3 | 394 FPS | 27 FPS | +1359.3% (A) |
| The Witcher 3 | 290 FPS | 21 FPS | +1281% (A) |
| The Witcher 3 v4 | 138 FPS | 7 FPS | +1871.4% (A) |
| Tiny Tina's Wonderlands | 168 FPS | 8 FPS | +2000% (A) |
| Total War Pharaoh | 220 FPS | 23 FPS | +856.5% (A) |
| Valorant | 350 FPS | 129 FPS | +171.3% (A) |
| Watch Dogs Legion | 131 FPS | 13 FPS | +907.7% (A) |
| X-Plane 11.11 | 78 FPS | 30 FPS | +160% (A) |
| Yakuza Like a Dragon | 167 FPS | 20 FPS | +735% (A) |
Specs from public sources (PassMark, Geekbench). FPS measured at 1080p medium settings.
Based on the comparison:
GeForce RTX 4090 wins 19 of the comparable criteria.
The choice depends on your use case.
🤔 How to choose
Universal advice for any use case.
- Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
- Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
- Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).