Component comparison
GeForce RTX 4090 vs GeForce GTX 1050
GeForce RTX 4090 vs GeForce GTX 1050 — detailed GPU comparison: performance, gaming FPS, specifications.
Advantages
A
GeForce RTX 4090
- + Release year (+6)
- + VRAM (GB) (+14 GB)
- + Bandwidth (GB/s) (+922 GB/s)
- + Memory bus (bit) (+256 bit)
- + TGP / TDP (W) (+45 W)
- + Lithography (nm) (-10 nm)
- + Transistors (M) (+73,000M)
- + CUDA cores (+15616)
- + TMUs (+464)
- + ROPs (+152)
- + FP32 performance (TFLOPS) (+80.36 TFLOPS)
- + Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) (+396.94 GPixel/s)
- + Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) (+1231.80 GTexel/s)
- + Energy efficiency (+30.9)
- + PassMark (overall) (+21999)
- + 3DMark Fire Strike (+40123)
- + Normalized score (+43.7)
B
GeForce GTX 1050
- + Memory clock (MHz) (+4758 MHz)
- + Die size (mm²) (+477 mm²)
Detailed spec comparison
| Spec |
Component A
GeForce RTX 4090
|
Component B
GeForce GTX 1050
|
|---|---|---|
| Release year | 2023 (+6) | 2017 |
| VRAM (GB) | 16 GB (+14 GB) | 2 GB |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory clock (MHz) | 2250 MHz | 7008 MHz (+4758 MHz) |
| Bandwidth (GB/s) | 1034 GB/s (+922 GB/s) | 112 GB/s |
| Memory bus (bit) | 384 bit (+256 bit) | 128 bit |
| TGP / TDP (W) | 120 W (+45 W) | 75 W |
| Lithography (nm) | 4 nm (-10 nm) | 14 nm |
| Transistors (M) | 76,300M (+73,000M) | 3,300M |
| Die size (mm²) | 609 mm² | 132 mm² (+477 mm²) |
| Base clock (MHz) | — | — |
| Boost clock (MHz) | — | — |
| CUDA cores | 16,384 (+15616) | 768 |
| TMUs | 512 (+464) | 48 |
| ROPs | 176 (+152) | 24 |
| RT cores | 128 | — |
| Tensor cores | 512 | — |
| FP32 performance (TFLOPS) | 82.58 TFLOPS (+80.36 TFLOPS) | 2.21 TFLOPS |
| Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) | 443.50 GPixel/s (+396.94 GPixel/s) | 46.56 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) | 1290.00 GTexel/s (+1231.80 GTexel/s) | 58.20 GTexel/s |
| Energy efficiency | 41.9 (+30.9) | 11.0 |
| PassMark (overall) | 27,047 (+21999) | 5,048 |
| 3DMark Time Spy | 21,251 | — |
| 3DMark Fire Strike | 46,191 (+40123) | 6,068 |
| Geekbench OpenCL | — | 17,429 |
| Geekbench Vulkan | — | 15,766 |
| Normalized score | 75.0 (+43.7) | 31.3 |
Only in component A
DLSS
ReBAR
ray_tracing
In both
CUDA
FPS in games (1080p)
| Game | GeForce RTX 4090 | GeForce GTX 1050 | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Plague Tale Requiem | 87 FPS | 16 FPS | +443.8% (A) |
| Assassin´s Creed Valhalla | 144 FPS | 14 FPS | +928.6% (A) |
| Atlas Fallen | 182 FPS | 26 FPS | +600% (A) |
| Atomic Heart | 144 FPS | 20 FPS | +620% (A) |
| Back 4 Blood | 309 FPS | 40 FPS | +672.5% (A) |
| Baldur's Gate 3 | 123 FPS | 16 FPS | +668.8% (A) |
| Battlefield 5 | 170 FPS | 51 FPS | +233.3% (A) |
| Borderlands 3 | 162 FPS | 23 FPS | +604.3% (A) |
| CS:GO | 240 FPS | 240 FPS | ≈ |
| Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 2022 | 147 FPS | 21 FPS | +600% (A) |
| Company of Heroes 3 | 235 FPS | 31 FPS | +658.1% (A) |
| Control | 184 FPS | 17 FPS | +982.4% (A) |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 300 FPS | 65 FPS | +361.5% (A) |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 147 FPS | 24 FPS | +512.5% (A) |
| Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 | 98 FPS | 14 FPS | +600% (A) |
| Dead Island 2 | 190 FPS | 34 FPS | +458.8% (A) |
| Dead Space Remake | 130 FPS | 11 FPS | +1081.8% (A) |
| Death Stranding | 167 FPS | 30 FPS | +456.7% (A) |
| Diablo 4 | 361 FPS | 44 FPS | +720.5% (A) |
| Dota 2 | 199 FPS | 126 FPS | +57.9% (A) |
| Dying Light 2 | 145 FPS | 14 FPS | +935.7% (A) |
| Elden Ring | 60 FPS | 27 FPS | +122.2% (A) |
| Elex 2 | 116 FPS | 17 FPS | +582.4% (A) |
| Escape from Tarkov | 120 FPS | 54 FPS | +122.2% (A) |
| F1 2020 | 344 FPS | 47 FPS | +631.9% (A) |
| F1 2021 | 276 FPS | 37 FPS | +645.9% (A) |
| F1 22 | 199 FPS | 38 FPS | +423.7% (A) |
| F1 23 | 152 FPS | 36 FPS | +322.2% (A) |
| Far Cry 5 | 173 FPS | 39 FPS | +343.6% (A) |
| Far Cry 6 | 103 FPS | 24 FPS | +329.2% (A) |
| Far Cry New Dawn | 145 FPS | 36 FPS | +302.8% (A) |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | 122 FPS | 18 FPS | +577.8% (A) |
| Fortnite | 300 FPS | 132 FPS | +127.3% (A) |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 250 FPS | 55 FPS | +354.5% (A) |
| Forza Horizon 5 | 281 FPS | 35 FPS | +702.9% (A) |
| GRID Legends | 190 FPS | 40 FPS | +375% (A) |
| GTA V | 140 FPS | 140 FPS | ≈ |
| GTA V | 154 FPS | 66 FPS | +133.3% (A) |
| God of War | 167 FPS | 16 FPS | +943.8% (A) |
| Guardians of the Galaxy | 158 FPS | 29 FPS | +444.8% (A) |
| High On Life | 211 FPS | 27 FPS | +681.5% (A) |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 45 FPS | 17 FPS | +164.7% (A) |
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 174 FPS | 24 FPS | +625% (A) |
| Hunt Showdown | 262 FPS | 28 FPS | +835.7% (A) |
| Mafia Definitive Edition | 179 FPS | 27 FPS | +563% (A) |
| Metro Exodus | 156 FPS | 19 FPS | +721.1% (A) |
| Overwatch | 240 FPS | 240 FPS | ≈ |
| PUBG | 140 FPS | 140 FPS | ≈ |
| Rainbow Six Extraction | 346 FPS | 36 FPS | +861.1% (A) |
| Ratchet & Clank Rift Apart | 135 FPS | 16 FPS | +743.8% (A) |
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 218 FPS | 24 FPS | +808.3% (A) |
| Returnal | 159 FPS | 20 FPS | +695% (A) |
| Riders Republic | 185 FPS | 26 FPS | +611.5% (A) |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 243 FPS | 39 FPS | +523.1% (A) |
| Sons of the Forest | 88 FPS | 21 FPS | +319% (A) |
| Spider-Man Miles Morales | 118 FPS | 29 FPS | +306.9% (A) |
| Star Wars Jedi Survivor | 106 FPS | 13 FPS | +715.4% (A) |
| The Callisto Protocol | 116 FPS | 27 FPS | +329.6% (A) |
| The Last of Us | 103 FPS | 12 FPS | +758.3% (A) |
| The Quarry | 177 FPS | 19 FPS | +831.6% (A) |
| The Witcher 3 | 394 FPS | 39 FPS | +910.3% (A) |
| The Witcher 3 | 290 FPS | 29 FPS | +900% (A) |
| The Witcher 3 v4 | 138 FPS | 32 FPS | +331.3% (A) |
| Tiny Tina's Wonderlands | 168 FPS | 19 FPS | +784.2% (A) |
| Valorant | 350 FPS | 100 FPS | +250% (A) |
| Watch Dogs Legion | 131 FPS | 22 FPS | +495.5% (A) |
| X-Plane 11.11 | 78 FPS | 45 FPS | +73.3% (A) |
| Yakuza Like a Dragon | 167 FPS | 27 FPS | +518.5% (A) |
Specs from public sources (PassMark, Geekbench). FPS measured at 1080p medium settings.
Based on the comparison:
GeForce RTX 4090 wins 17 of the comparable criteria.
The choice depends on your use case.
🤔 How to choose
Universal advice for any use case.
- Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
- Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
- Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).